异域模式、熟悉主题:希曼诺夫斯基与Górecki作品中的民俗审美功能

IF 0.3 0 MUSIC
Alex Chilvers
{"title":"异域模式、熟悉主题:希曼诺夫斯基与Górecki作品中的民俗审美功能","authors":"Alex Chilvers","doi":"10.1080/08145857.2021.2006869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There is an overwhelming tendency for scholars of Polish music to politicize the presence of folk music references when they appear in art music compositions. This has particularly been the case in studies of Frédéric Chopin, where certain myths pertaining to that composer’s extramusical intentions have long dominated how his music was unpacked in musicological literature. In this article, I demonstrate that our understanding of later Polish composers suffers similarly from the politicization of folklore. In an examination of the discourse surrounding both Karol Szymanowski and Henryk Mikołaj Górecki, I argue that a myopic understanding of the compositional possibilities bound up in folk music engagement has limited the scope of our interrogations into their compositional practices. I then reposition folk music as an aesthetic tool in their works that has enabled these artists to negotiate the compositional challenges confronting their respective generations. In addition to improving our understanding of these two composers’ methods, my analyses highlight how folk music models can lend a sense of familiarity and cohesion to the modern musical aesthetic.","PeriodicalId":41713,"journal":{"name":"Musicology Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foreign Models, Familiar Themes: The Aesthetic Function of Folklore in Works by Szymanowski and Górecki\",\"authors\":\"Alex Chilvers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08145857.2021.2006869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract There is an overwhelming tendency for scholars of Polish music to politicize the presence of folk music references when they appear in art music compositions. This has particularly been the case in studies of Frédéric Chopin, where certain myths pertaining to that composer’s extramusical intentions have long dominated how his music was unpacked in musicological literature. In this article, I demonstrate that our understanding of later Polish composers suffers similarly from the politicization of folklore. In an examination of the discourse surrounding both Karol Szymanowski and Henryk Mikołaj Górecki, I argue that a myopic understanding of the compositional possibilities bound up in folk music engagement has limited the scope of our interrogations into their compositional practices. I then reposition folk music as an aesthetic tool in their works that has enabled these artists to negotiate the compositional challenges confronting their respective generations. In addition to improving our understanding of these two composers’ methods, my analyses highlight how folk music models can lend a sense of familiarity and cohesion to the modern musical aesthetic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musicology Australia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musicology Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08145857.2021.2006869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musicology Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08145857.2021.2006869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要波兰音乐学者在艺术音乐作品中出现民间音乐参考时,普遍倾向于将其政治化。在对弗雷德里克·肖邦的研究中尤其如此,在音乐学文献中,与这位作曲家的音乐外意图有关的某些神话长期以来一直主导着他的音乐是如何被解开的。在这篇文章中,我证明了我们对后来波兰作曲家的理解同样受到民间传说政治化的影响。在研究围绕卡罗尔·西马诺夫斯基和亨里克·米科瓦伊·戈雷基的话语时,我认为,对民间音乐参与中的作曲可能性的短视理解限制了我们对其作曲实践的质疑范围。然后,我将民间音乐重新定位为他们作品中的一种美学工具,使这些艺术家能够应对各自世代面临的作曲挑战。除了提高我们对这两位作曲家方法的理解外,我的分析还强调了民间音乐模式如何为现代音乐美学提供熟悉感和凝聚力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Foreign Models, Familiar Themes: The Aesthetic Function of Folklore in Works by Szymanowski and Górecki
Abstract There is an overwhelming tendency for scholars of Polish music to politicize the presence of folk music references when they appear in art music compositions. This has particularly been the case in studies of Frédéric Chopin, where certain myths pertaining to that composer’s extramusical intentions have long dominated how his music was unpacked in musicological literature. In this article, I demonstrate that our understanding of later Polish composers suffers similarly from the politicization of folklore. In an examination of the discourse surrounding both Karol Szymanowski and Henryk Mikołaj Górecki, I argue that a myopic understanding of the compositional possibilities bound up in folk music engagement has limited the scope of our interrogations into their compositional practices. I then reposition folk music as an aesthetic tool in their works that has enabled these artists to negotiate the compositional challenges confronting their respective generations. In addition to improving our understanding of these two composers’ methods, my analyses highlight how folk music models can lend a sense of familiarity and cohesion to the modern musical aesthetic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信