个人幸运,集体强大:对朋友的回应

IF 1.3 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
K. Dowding
{"title":"个人幸运,集体强大:对朋友的回应","authors":"K. Dowding","doi":"10.1080/2158379X.2021.1901197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper responds to commentators on the reissue of Keith Dowding, Rational Choice and Political Power. I discuss how powerlessness depends upon collective action problems, the nature of systematic luck, and their interaction with individual responsibility. I defend measurement in conceptual analysis, discuss vagueness and ambiguity and the incoherence of some social concepts. I defend power as a simple notion whose context suggest different extensions. I discuss the conceptual and predictive use of models. I defend ‘rationality’ as consistency which stands for lawlike regularity. Finally, I discuss the problems raised with my account of persuasion in terms of manipulation.","PeriodicalId":45560,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Power","volume":"14 1","pages":"340 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1901197","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individually lucky, collectively powerful: a response to friends\",\"authors\":\"K. Dowding\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2158379X.2021.1901197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper responds to commentators on the reissue of Keith Dowding, Rational Choice and Political Power. I discuss how powerlessness depends upon collective action problems, the nature of systematic luck, and their interaction with individual responsibility. I defend measurement in conceptual analysis, discuss vagueness and ambiguity and the incoherence of some social concepts. I defend power as a simple notion whose context suggest different extensions. I discuss the conceptual and predictive use of models. I defend ‘rationality’ as consistency which stands for lawlike regularity. Finally, I discuss the problems raised with my account of persuasion in terms of manipulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Power\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"340 - 362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1901197\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1901197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1901197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文回应了对基思·道丁《理性选择与政治权力》再版的评论。我讨论了无力感是如何依赖于集体行动问题、系统运气的本质以及它们与个人责任的相互作用。我为概念分析中的测量辩护,讨论了一些社会概念的模糊性、模糊性和不连贯性。我认为权力是一个简单的概念,它的背景暗示着不同的扩展。我讨论了模型的概念性和预测性使用。我认为“理性”是一种一致性,它代表着法律般的规律性。最后,我从操纵的角度讨论了我对说服的描述所带来的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individually lucky, collectively powerful: a response to friends
ABSTRACT This paper responds to commentators on the reissue of Keith Dowding, Rational Choice and Political Power. I discuss how powerlessness depends upon collective action problems, the nature of systematic luck, and their interaction with individual responsibility. I defend measurement in conceptual analysis, discuss vagueness and ambiguity and the incoherence of some social concepts. I defend power as a simple notion whose context suggest different extensions. I discuss the conceptual and predictive use of models. I defend ‘rationality’ as consistency which stands for lawlike regularity. Finally, I discuss the problems raised with my account of persuasion in terms of manipulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Power
Journal of Political Power POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信