这条线下面是绝迹,晚期风格,晚期浪漫主义

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Brecht de Groote
{"title":"这条线下面是绝迹,晚期风格,晚期浪漫主义","authors":"Brecht de Groote","doi":"10.1080/08905495.2021.2023342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In light of a recent surge of interest in the literature of extinction, critics have begun to revisit the concept of late style first theorised by Adorno. As they return lateness to critical circulation, they often anchor the concept in Romantic writing. In contrast to the small-r romantic interpretation of late work often favoured by such work, in which biography and affect predominate, the present article contends that late-Romantic writing actually resists personalised readings. Instead, late-Romantic texts seek to disarticulate a personalising perspective in imagining themselves posterior to an ending that is utterly irrecuperable. Moreover, while readings of texts instinct with late temporality have recently focused on themes of individual or global extinction, the article argues that such concerns should be acknowledged to interlock with, perhaps even figure forth, meditations on the waning of Romantic ideas and ideals from the 1820s forward. Tracing the ways in which late-Romantic writing constructs for itself a sense of periodicity by paradoxically noting its disintegration, the article offers brief readings of Wordsworth, Mary Shelley, Byron, Hazlitt, and Trelawny.","PeriodicalId":43278,"journal":{"name":"Nineteenth-Century Contexts-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Below the line: extinction, late style, late Romanticism\",\"authors\":\"Brecht de Groote\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08905495.2021.2023342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In light of a recent surge of interest in the literature of extinction, critics have begun to revisit the concept of late style first theorised by Adorno. As they return lateness to critical circulation, they often anchor the concept in Romantic writing. In contrast to the small-r romantic interpretation of late work often favoured by such work, in which biography and affect predominate, the present article contends that late-Romantic writing actually resists personalised readings. Instead, late-Romantic texts seek to disarticulate a personalising perspective in imagining themselves posterior to an ending that is utterly irrecuperable. Moreover, while readings of texts instinct with late temporality have recently focused on themes of individual or global extinction, the article argues that such concerns should be acknowledged to interlock with, perhaps even figure forth, meditations on the waning of Romantic ideas and ideals from the 1820s forward. Tracing the ways in which late-Romantic writing constructs for itself a sense of periodicity by paradoxically noting its disintegration, the article offers brief readings of Wordsworth, Mary Shelley, Byron, Hazlitt, and Trelawny.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nineteenth-Century Contexts-An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nineteenth-Century Contexts-An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08905495.2021.2023342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nineteenth-Century Contexts-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08905495.2021.2023342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于最近对灭绝文学的兴趣激增,评论家们开始重新审视阿多诺首次提出的晚期风格概念。当他们将迟到回归评论界时,他们经常将这一概念锚定在浪漫主义写作中。与这类作品中传记和情感占主导地位的对晚期作品的小规模浪漫主义解读相反,本文认为晚期浪漫主义写作实际上抵制个性化阅读。相反,晚期浪漫主义文本试图在想象自己在一个完全无法抗拒的结局之后,脱离一种个性化的视角。此外,尽管最近对具有晚期时间性的文本本能的解读集中在个人或全球灭绝的主题上,但这篇文章认为,应该承认这种担忧与对19世纪20年代以来浪漫主义思想和理想衰落的思考是相互关联的,甚至是相互联系的。这篇文章通过矛盾地注意到其解体,追溯了晚期浪漫主义写作为自己构建周期感的方式,并简要阅读了华兹华斯、玛丽·雪莱、拜伦、黑兹利特和特里劳尼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Below the line: extinction, late style, late Romanticism
In light of a recent surge of interest in the literature of extinction, critics have begun to revisit the concept of late style first theorised by Adorno. As they return lateness to critical circulation, they often anchor the concept in Romantic writing. In contrast to the small-r romantic interpretation of late work often favoured by such work, in which biography and affect predominate, the present article contends that late-Romantic writing actually resists personalised readings. Instead, late-Romantic texts seek to disarticulate a personalising perspective in imagining themselves posterior to an ending that is utterly irrecuperable. Moreover, while readings of texts instinct with late temporality have recently focused on themes of individual or global extinction, the article argues that such concerns should be acknowledged to interlock with, perhaps even figure forth, meditations on the waning of Romantic ideas and ideals from the 1820s forward. Tracing the ways in which late-Romantic writing constructs for itself a sense of periodicity by paradoxically noting its disintegration, the article offers brief readings of Wordsworth, Mary Shelley, Byron, Hazlitt, and Trelawny.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Nineteenth-Century Contexts is committed to interdisciplinary recuperations of “new” nineteenth centuries and their relation to contemporary geopolitical developments. The journal challenges traditional modes of categorizing the nineteenth century by forging innovative contextualizations across a wide spectrum of nineteenth century experience and the critical disciplines that examine it. Articles not only integrate theories and methods of various fields of inquiry — art, history, musicology, anthropology, literary criticism, religious studies, social history, economics, popular culture studies, and the history of science, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信