使用标准化患者评估病历质量:来自中国农村的应用和证据

Yuju Wu, Huan Zhou, Xiao Ma, Yaojiang Shi, H. Xue, Chengchao Zhou, Hongmei Yi, Alexis Medina, Jason Li, S. Sylvia
{"title":"使用标准化患者评估病历质量:来自中国农村的应用和证据","authors":"Yuju Wu, Huan Zhou, Xiao Ma, Yaojiang Shi, H. Xue, Chengchao Zhou, Hongmei Yi, Alexis Medina, Jason Li, S. Sylvia","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Medical records play a fundamental role in healthcare delivery, quality assessment and improvement. However, there is little objective evidence on the quality of medical records in low and middle-income countries. Objective To provide an unbiased assessment of the quality of medical records for outpatient visits to rural facilities in China. Methods A sample of 207 township health facilities across three provinces of China were enrolled. Unannounced standardised patients (SPs) presented to providers following standardised scripts. Three weeks later, investigators returned to collect medical records from each facility. Audio recordings of clinical interactions were then used to evaluate completeness and accuracy of available medical records. Results Medical records were located for 210 out of 620 SP visits (33.8%). Of those located, more than 80% contained basic patient information and drug treatment when mentioned in visits, but only 57.6% recorded diagnoses. The most incompletely recorded category of information was patient symptoms (74.3% unrecorded), followed by non-drug treatments (65.2% unrecorded). Most of the recorded information was accurate, but accuracy fell below 80% for some items. The keeping of any medical records was positively correlated with the provider’s income (β 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09). Providers at hospitals with prescription review were less likely to record completely (β −0.87, 95% CI −1.68 to 0.06). Significant variation by disease type was also found in keeping of any medical record and completeness. Conclusion Despite the importance of medical records for health system functioning, many rural facilities have yet to implement systems for maintaining patient records, and records are often incomplete when they exist. Prescription review tied to performance evaluation should be implemented with caution as it may create disincentives for record keeping. Interventions to improve record keeping and management are needed.","PeriodicalId":49653,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","volume":"29 1","pages":"491 - 498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009890","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using standardised patients to assess the quality of medical records: an application and evidence from rural China\",\"authors\":\"Yuju Wu, Huan Zhou, Xiao Ma, Yaojiang Shi, H. Xue, Chengchao Zhou, Hongmei Yi, Alexis Medina, Jason Li, S. Sylvia\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Medical records play a fundamental role in healthcare delivery, quality assessment and improvement. However, there is little objective evidence on the quality of medical records in low and middle-income countries. Objective To provide an unbiased assessment of the quality of medical records for outpatient visits to rural facilities in China. Methods A sample of 207 township health facilities across three provinces of China were enrolled. Unannounced standardised patients (SPs) presented to providers following standardised scripts. Three weeks later, investigators returned to collect medical records from each facility. Audio recordings of clinical interactions were then used to evaluate completeness and accuracy of available medical records. Results Medical records were located for 210 out of 620 SP visits (33.8%). Of those located, more than 80% contained basic patient information and drug treatment when mentioned in visits, but only 57.6% recorded diagnoses. The most incompletely recorded category of information was patient symptoms (74.3% unrecorded), followed by non-drug treatments (65.2% unrecorded). Most of the recorded information was accurate, but accuracy fell below 80% for some items. The keeping of any medical records was positively correlated with the provider’s income (β 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09). Providers at hospitals with prescription review were less likely to record completely (β −0.87, 95% CI −1.68 to 0.06). Significant variation by disease type was also found in keeping of any medical record and completeness. Conclusion Despite the importance of medical records for health system functioning, many rural facilities have yet to implement systems for maintaining patient records, and records are often incomplete when they exist. Prescription review tied to performance evaluation should be implemented with caution as it may create disincentives for record keeping. Interventions to improve record keeping and management are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality & Safety in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"491 - 498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009890\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality & Safety in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

医疗记录在医疗服务提供、质量评估和改进中发挥着重要作用。然而,关于低收入和中等收入国家医疗记录质量的客观证据很少。目的对中国农村医疗机构门诊病历质量进行客观评价。方法选取全国3省207个乡镇卫生院为研究对象。未通知的标准化患者(SPs)按照标准化处方提交给提供者。三周后,调查人员返回每家医院收集医疗记录。然后使用临床相互作用的录音来评估现有医疗记录的完整性和准确性。结果620例SP就诊中,有210例(33.8%)找到病历。在这些医院中,80%以上的医院在就诊时提到了患者的基本信息和药物治疗情况,但只有57.6%的医院记录了诊断情况。记录最不完整的信息类别是患者症状(74.3%未记录),其次是非药物治疗(65.2%未记录)。大多数记录的信息是准确的,但有些项目的准确性低于80%。保留任何医疗记录与提供者的收入呈正相关(β 0.05, 95% CI 0.01至0.09)。有处方审查的医院的提供者不太可能记录完整(β - 0.87, 95% CI - 1.68至0.06)。在病历保存和完整性方面,疾病类型也存在显著差异。尽管医疗记录对卫生系统的运作很重要,但许多农村设施尚未实施维护患者记录的系统,即使有记录,也往往不完整。与绩效评价挂钩的处方审查应谨慎实施,因为它可能会对记录保存产生不利影响。改善记录保存和管理的干预措施是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using standardised patients to assess the quality of medical records: an application and evidence from rural China
Background Medical records play a fundamental role in healthcare delivery, quality assessment and improvement. However, there is little objective evidence on the quality of medical records in low and middle-income countries. Objective To provide an unbiased assessment of the quality of medical records for outpatient visits to rural facilities in China. Methods A sample of 207 township health facilities across three provinces of China were enrolled. Unannounced standardised patients (SPs) presented to providers following standardised scripts. Three weeks later, investigators returned to collect medical records from each facility. Audio recordings of clinical interactions were then used to evaluate completeness and accuracy of available medical records. Results Medical records were located for 210 out of 620 SP visits (33.8%). Of those located, more than 80% contained basic patient information and drug treatment when mentioned in visits, but only 57.6% recorded diagnoses. The most incompletely recorded category of information was patient symptoms (74.3% unrecorded), followed by non-drug treatments (65.2% unrecorded). Most of the recorded information was accurate, but accuracy fell below 80% for some items. The keeping of any medical records was positively correlated with the provider’s income (β 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09). Providers at hospitals with prescription review were less likely to record completely (β −0.87, 95% CI −1.68 to 0.06). Significant variation by disease type was also found in keeping of any medical record and completeness. Conclusion Despite the importance of medical records for health system functioning, many rural facilities have yet to implement systems for maintaining patient records, and records are often incomplete when they exist. Prescription review tied to performance evaluation should be implemented with caution as it may create disincentives for record keeping. Interventions to improve record keeping and management are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Quality & Safety in Health Care 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信