旧建筑的“修复”[1904]

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Hermann Muthesius
{"title":"旧建筑的“修复”[1904]","authors":"Hermann Muthesius","doi":"10.1080/17561310.2023.2191753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Muthesius criticizes restoration architects whose aim is to return a building to an ideal past state, an approach he decries as both impossible (because one cannot replicate the work of a craftsman of 500 years before) and dangerous when nearly successful (because it conceals the stages of the building’s construction). Drawing on the ideas of William Morris, he instead calls for preserving buildings by repairing them where needed in materials that contrast with the rest of the building, thus clearly distinguishing new from old.","PeriodicalId":53629,"journal":{"name":"Art in Translation","volume":"15 1","pages":"10 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘Restoration’ of Our Old Buildings [1904]\",\"authors\":\"Hermann Muthesius\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17561310.2023.2191753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Muthesius criticizes restoration architects whose aim is to return a building to an ideal past state, an approach he decries as both impossible (because one cannot replicate the work of a craftsman of 500 years before) and dangerous when nearly successful (because it conceals the stages of the building’s construction). Drawing on the ideas of William Morris, he instead calls for preserving buildings by repairing them where needed in materials that contrast with the rest of the building, thus clearly distinguishing new from old.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art in Translation\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"10 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art in Translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2023.2191753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art in Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2023.2191753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Muthesius批评那些旨在将建筑物恢复到过去理想状态的修复建筑师,他谴责这种方法既不可能(因为一个人无法复制500年前工匠的工作),又在接近成功时危险(因为它掩盖了建筑物的建造阶段)。根据威廉·莫里斯的想法,他呼吁通过在需要的地方修复建筑物,并使用与建筑物其他部分形成对比的材料来保护建筑物,从而清楚地区分新旧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ‘Restoration’ of Our Old Buildings [1904]
Abstract Muthesius criticizes restoration architects whose aim is to return a building to an ideal past state, an approach he decries as both impossible (because one cannot replicate the work of a craftsman of 500 years before) and dangerous when nearly successful (because it conceals the stages of the building’s construction). Drawing on the ideas of William Morris, he instead calls for preserving buildings by repairing them where needed in materials that contrast with the rest of the building, thus clearly distinguishing new from old.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Art in Translation
Art in Translation Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信