P. Araujo, A. Guimarães, M. R. Moura, A. C. M. Vieira
{"title":"巴西里约热内卢“山金车”商业样品的质量控制","authors":"P. Araujo, A. Guimarães, M. R. Moura, A. C. M. Vieira","doi":"10.18406/2316-1817V13N120211561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arnica montana is a medicinal plant native to Europe and used topically to treat contusions, inflammations, and muscular aches. Studies have confirmed the anti-inflammatory activity of extracts of this plant, which can be attributed to the presence of lactones. Its use in Brazil has traditionally been substituted by the species Solidago chilensis, which demonstrates similar therapeutic activity but is more adapted to a tropical climate. It is known that S. chilensis can be used as a substitute for A. montana as they both contain similar active compounds. We acquired eight different commercial brands of “arnica” sold in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, in 2013. The analyses of these products were divided into four categories: labeling, macroscopic, microscopic, and microchemical analysis. Labeling analysis followed RDCs (“Resolução de Diretoria Colegiada”) standards (10/2010 through 26/2014). The morphological analyses were performed using microscopic techniques and were followed by microchemical analyses. Our results indicated that none of the samples were in complete conformity with labeling standards, the material was poorly conserved, contaminants were abundantly present, the species were incorrectly identified, and the directions of use were inadequate and potentially dangerous to human health.","PeriodicalId":43096,"journal":{"name":"Revista Agrogeoambiental","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality control of commercial samples of “arnica” (Arnica montana and Solidago chilensis) from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"P. Araujo, A. Guimarães, M. R. Moura, A. C. M. Vieira\",\"doi\":\"10.18406/2316-1817V13N120211561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arnica montana is a medicinal plant native to Europe and used topically to treat contusions, inflammations, and muscular aches. Studies have confirmed the anti-inflammatory activity of extracts of this plant, which can be attributed to the presence of lactones. Its use in Brazil has traditionally been substituted by the species Solidago chilensis, which demonstrates similar therapeutic activity but is more adapted to a tropical climate. It is known that S. chilensis can be used as a substitute for A. montana as they both contain similar active compounds. We acquired eight different commercial brands of “arnica” sold in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, in 2013. The analyses of these products were divided into four categories: labeling, macroscopic, microscopic, and microchemical analysis. Labeling analysis followed RDCs (“Resolução de Diretoria Colegiada”) standards (10/2010 through 26/2014). The morphological analyses were performed using microscopic techniques and were followed by microchemical analyses. Our results indicated that none of the samples were in complete conformity with labeling standards, the material was poorly conserved, contaminants were abundantly present, the species were incorrectly identified, and the directions of use were inadequate and potentially dangerous to human health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Agrogeoambiental\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Agrogeoambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18406/2316-1817V13N120211561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Agrogeoambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18406/2316-1817V13N120211561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
蒙大拿山金车是一种原产于欧洲的药用植物,用于局部治疗挫伤、炎症和肌肉疼痛。研究证实了这种植物提取物的抗炎活性,这可以归因于内酯的存在。它在巴西的使用传统上已被黄黄花所取代,黄黄花具有类似的治疗作用,但更适应热带气候。众所周知,智利葡萄可以作为蒙大拿葡萄的替代品,因为它们都含有相似的活性化合物。2013年,我们收购了8个不同的商业品牌的“山金车”,在巴西的巴西里约热内卢州销售。这些产品的分析分为四类:标记分析、宏观分析、微观分析和微化学分析。标签分析遵循rdc(“resolupal o de directoria Colegiada”)标准(2010年10月至2014年26日)。形态学分析使用显微技术进行,随后进行微化学分析。我们的结果表明,没有一个样品完全符合标签标准,材料保存不良,污染物大量存在,物种识别错误,使用说明不充分,对人体健康有潜在危险。
Quality control of commercial samples of “arnica” (Arnica montana and Solidago chilensis) from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Arnica montana is a medicinal plant native to Europe and used topically to treat contusions, inflammations, and muscular aches. Studies have confirmed the anti-inflammatory activity of extracts of this plant, which can be attributed to the presence of lactones. Its use in Brazil has traditionally been substituted by the species Solidago chilensis, which demonstrates similar therapeutic activity but is more adapted to a tropical climate. It is known that S. chilensis can be used as a substitute for A. montana as they both contain similar active compounds. We acquired eight different commercial brands of “arnica” sold in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, in 2013. The analyses of these products were divided into four categories: labeling, macroscopic, microscopic, and microchemical analysis. Labeling analysis followed RDCs (“Resolução de Diretoria Colegiada”) standards (10/2010 through 26/2014). The morphological analyses were performed using microscopic techniques and were followed by microchemical analyses. Our results indicated that none of the samples were in complete conformity with labeling standards, the material was poorly conserved, contaminants were abundantly present, the species were incorrectly identified, and the directions of use were inadequate and potentially dangerous to human health.