{"title":"病人路径的过程改进:应用分解法加速纵向设计的案例研究。","authors":"Aske Skouboe, Z. Hansen, Jan Kloppenborg MØller","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-18-00224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EXECUTIVE SUMMARY\nEvaluations of improvements in long chronic-patient pathways must include both short- and long-term effects on patients; that is, effects on the full patient pathway. Otherwise, costs might be cut without considering the long-term effects and, consequently, the overall cost of the pathway could increase. Unfortunately, current methods of evaluation present several issues: (1) they do not provide valid insights regarding the effects of a given improvement effort until several years later, (2) they provide imprecise and biased results, and (3) the aggregated results are not useful for identifying and disseminating the best practices that lead to an improvement. In this article, the accelerated longitudinal design with decomposition of total costs (ALDD) method is applied to evaluate the effects of improvement efforts on inpatient utilization for long cardiac pathways at a Danish hospital. The results show that the ALDD method can deliver valid results much faster than traditional methods and can uncover hidden improvements in the local work processes of clinical teams. Application of the ALDD method at a hospital in Denmark identified a significant reduction (15.4%) in the mean total bed utilization per cardiac pathway and revealed that this reduction was caused by improvements in the work processes.","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/JHM-D-18-00224","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process Improvement in Patient Pathways: A Case Study Applying Accelerated Longitudinal Design With Decomposition Method.\",\"authors\":\"Aske Skouboe, Z. Hansen, Jan Kloppenborg MØller\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHM-D-18-00224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"EXECUTIVE SUMMARY\\nEvaluations of improvements in long chronic-patient pathways must include both short- and long-term effects on patients; that is, effects on the full patient pathway. Otherwise, costs might be cut without considering the long-term effects and, consequently, the overall cost of the pathway could increase. Unfortunately, current methods of evaluation present several issues: (1) they do not provide valid insights regarding the effects of a given improvement effort until several years later, (2) they provide imprecise and biased results, and (3) the aggregated results are not useful for identifying and disseminating the best practices that lead to an improvement. In this article, the accelerated longitudinal design with decomposition of total costs (ALDD) method is applied to evaluate the effects of improvement efforts on inpatient utilization for long cardiac pathways at a Danish hospital. The results show that the ALDD method can deliver valid results much faster than traditional methods and can uncover hidden improvements in the local work processes of clinical teams. Application of the ALDD method at a hospital in Denmark identified a significant reduction (15.4%) in the mean total bed utilization per cardiac pathway and revealed that this reduction was caused by improvements in the work processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/JHM-D-18-00224\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-18-00224\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-18-00224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Process Improvement in Patient Pathways: A Case Study Applying Accelerated Longitudinal Design With Decomposition Method.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Evaluations of improvements in long chronic-patient pathways must include both short- and long-term effects on patients; that is, effects on the full patient pathway. Otherwise, costs might be cut without considering the long-term effects and, consequently, the overall cost of the pathway could increase. Unfortunately, current methods of evaluation present several issues: (1) they do not provide valid insights regarding the effects of a given improvement effort until several years later, (2) they provide imprecise and biased results, and (3) the aggregated results are not useful for identifying and disseminating the best practices that lead to an improvement. In this article, the accelerated longitudinal design with decomposition of total costs (ALDD) method is applied to evaluate the effects of improvement efforts on inpatient utilization for long cardiac pathways at a Danish hospital. The results show that the ALDD method can deliver valid results much faster than traditional methods and can uncover hidden improvements in the local work processes of clinical teams. Application of the ALDD method at a hospital in Denmark identified a significant reduction (15.4%) in the mean total bed utilization per cardiac pathway and revealed that this reduction was caused by improvements in the work processes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.