公共、社区和商品化:印度喀拉拉邦土地、水和地方民主改革综述

IF 2.4 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Vinay Sankar
{"title":"公共、社区和商品化:印度喀拉拉邦土地、水和地方民主改革综述","authors":"Vinay Sankar","doi":"10.1080/23251042.2022.2135062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As India is releasing its third National Water Policy in the last 20 years, this paper seeks to review the earlier policies relevant to a critical yet under-studied surface water ecosystem of rural community ponds. The paper examines how the notion of commodification informed the policies on water, land and local democracy, impacting the governance of rural community ponds in the state of Kerala, India. The review shows that while earlier country-level policies largely showed a tendency to treat water as a commodity, decommodification tendencies are perceptible in the water policy of Kerala. Nonetheless, the land reforms in Kerala resulted in Dalit Bahujans being systematically excluded from accessing land, even though it ended the operation of commoditised human bodies, and enforced land ceilings. Huge tracts of plantations were kept out of the purview of land reforms, signifying the operation of commodification. A positive aspect of the land ceilings was that many private enclosures like rural ponds were transferred to the state. The reforms in local democracy, to a great extent, led to accessible policy-making. The framework of ‘double movement’ is useful in analysing the trends in environmental sociology and evaluating policies related to socio-ecological systems.","PeriodicalId":54173,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commons, communities and commodification: a review of reforms in land, water and local democracy in Kerala, India\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Sankar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23251042.2022.2135062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As India is releasing its third National Water Policy in the last 20 years, this paper seeks to review the earlier policies relevant to a critical yet under-studied surface water ecosystem of rural community ponds. The paper examines how the notion of commodification informed the policies on water, land and local democracy, impacting the governance of rural community ponds in the state of Kerala, India. The review shows that while earlier country-level policies largely showed a tendency to treat water as a commodity, decommodification tendencies are perceptible in the water policy of Kerala. Nonetheless, the land reforms in Kerala resulted in Dalit Bahujans being systematically excluded from accessing land, even though it ended the operation of commoditised human bodies, and enforced land ceilings. Huge tracts of plantations were kept out of the purview of land reforms, signifying the operation of commodification. A positive aspect of the land ceilings was that many private enclosures like rural ponds were transferred to the state. The reforms in local democracy, to a great extent, led to accessible policy-making. The framework of ‘double movement’ is useful in analysing the trends in environmental sociology and evaluating policies related to socio-ecological systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2022.2135062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2022.2135062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着印度在过去20年中发布其第三个国家水政策,本文试图回顾与农村社区池塘的关键但研究不足的地表水生态系统相关的早期政策。本文考察了商品化的概念如何影响了水、土地和地方民主政策,影响了印度喀拉拉邦农村社区池塘的治理。审查表明,虽然早期的国家一级政策在很大程度上显示出将水视为商品的倾向,但喀拉拉邦的水政策却有明显的退化趋势。尽管如此,喀拉拉邦的土地改革导致贱民被系统地排除在土地之外,尽管它结束了人体商品化的运作,并强制实施了土地上限。大片的种植园被排除在土地改革的范围之外,这标志着商品化的运作。土地上限的一个积极方面是,许多私人圈地,如农村池塘,被转移给了国家。地方民主改革在很大程度上促进了决策的便捷性。“双重运动”的框架在分析环境社会学的趋势和评价与社会生态系统有关的政策方面是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commons, communities and commodification: a review of reforms in land, water and local democracy in Kerala, India
ABSTRACT As India is releasing its third National Water Policy in the last 20 years, this paper seeks to review the earlier policies relevant to a critical yet under-studied surface water ecosystem of rural community ponds. The paper examines how the notion of commodification informed the policies on water, land and local democracy, impacting the governance of rural community ponds in the state of Kerala, India. The review shows that while earlier country-level policies largely showed a tendency to treat water as a commodity, decommodification tendencies are perceptible in the water policy of Kerala. Nonetheless, the land reforms in Kerala resulted in Dalit Bahujans being systematically excluded from accessing land, even though it ended the operation of commoditised human bodies, and enforced land ceilings. Huge tracts of plantations were kept out of the purview of land reforms, signifying the operation of commodification. A positive aspect of the land ceilings was that many private enclosures like rural ponds were transferred to the state. The reforms in local democracy, to a great extent, led to accessible policy-making. The framework of ‘double movement’ is useful in analysing the trends in environmental sociology and evaluating policies related to socio-ecological systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sociology
Environmental Sociology ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Environmental Sociology is dedicated to applying and advancing the sociological imagination in relation to a wide variety of environmental challenges, controversies and issues, at every level from the global to local, from ‘world culture’ to diverse local perspectives. As an international, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, Environmental Sociology aims to stretch the conceptual and theoretical boundaries of both environmental and mainstream sociology, to highlight the relevance of sociological research for environmental policy and management, to disseminate the results of sociological research, and to engage in productive dialogue and debate with other disciplines in the social, natural and ecological sciences. Contributions may utilize a variety of theoretical orientations including, but not restricted to: critical theory, cultural sociology, ecofeminism, ecological modernization, environmental justice, organizational sociology, political ecology, political economy, post-colonial studies, risk theory, social psychology, science and technology studies, globalization, world-systems analysis, and so on. Cross- and transdisciplinary contributions are welcome where they demonstrate a novel attempt to understand social-ecological relationships in a manner that engages with the core concerns of sociology in social relationships, institutions, practices and processes. All methodological approaches in the environmental social sciences – qualitative, quantitative, integrative, spatial, policy analysis, etc. – are welcomed. Environmental Sociology welcomes high-quality submissions from scholars around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信