英国脱欧和英国国家医疗服务体系：投票行为和对脱欧影响的看法

IF 1.5 3区社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-08-17 DOI:10.1057/s41293-022-00216-9

Stephen Drinkwater, Catherine Robinson

{"title":"英国脱欧和英国国家医疗服务体系：投票行为和对脱欧影响的看法","authors":"Stephen Drinkwater, Catherine Robinson","doi":"10.1057/s41293-022-00216-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines three aspects of Brexit with regards to the NHS. First, we consider the influence of views regarding one of the most contentious issues in the referendum campaign: Vote Leave's claim that the 'savings' from EU membership could alternatively be used to provide additional funding for the NHS. We find that views about NHS underfunding had a relatively small, but statistically significant, effect on leave voting even after controlling for a range of socio-demographic and economic variables. However, the magnitude of this effect is reduced and becomes insignificant when health-related and cultural controls are added. Second, we examine how NHS workers voted relative to others in employment, and find that a relatively high proportion was actually leave voters. Finally, we analyse whether individuals thought that Brexit would have a positive or negative impact on the NHS, as well as the reason or reasons for their view. We find that supporters of the Conservative party were by far the most likely to think that Brexit would be good for the NHS.","PeriodicalId":46067,"journal":{"name":"British Politics","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9383685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brexit and the NHS: voting behaviour and views on the impact of leaving the EU.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Drinkwater, Catherine Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41293-022-00216-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines three aspects of Brexit with regards to the NHS. First, we consider the influence of views regarding one of the most contentious issues in the referendum campaign: Vote Leave's claim that the 'savings' from EU membership could alternatively be used to provide additional funding for the NHS. We find that views about NHS underfunding had a relatively small, but statistically significant, effect on leave voting even after controlling for a range of socio-demographic and economic variables. However, the magnitude of this effect is reduced and becomes insignificant when health-related and cultural controls are added. Second, we examine how NHS workers voted relative to others in employment, and find that a relatively high proportion was actually leave voters. Finally, we analyse whether individuals thought that Brexit would have a positive or negative impact on the NHS, as well as the reason or reasons for their view. We find that supporters of the Conservative party were by far the most likely to think that Brexit would be good for the NHS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Politics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9383685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-022-00216-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-022-00216-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了英国脱欧与NHS的三个方面。首先，我们考虑有关公投活动中最具争议的问题之一的观点的影响：“脱欧派”声称，欧盟成员国的“储蓄”可以用来为NHS提供额外的资金。我们发现，即使在控制了一系列社会人口和经济变量之后，关于NHS资金不足的观点对脱欧投票的影响相对较小，但在统计上显着。然而，当加入与健康和文化相关的控制因素时，这种影响的程度就会降低，变得微不足道。其次，我们研究了NHS工作人员相对于其他就业人员的投票情况，发现实际上有相当高的比例是离开选民。最后，我们分析了个人是否认为英国脱欧会对NHS产生积极或消极的影响，以及他们观点的原因或原因。我们发现，到目前为止，保守党的支持者最有可能认为英国脱欧对NHS有利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Brexit and the NHS: voting behaviour and views on the impact of leaving the EU.

This paper examines three aspects of Brexit with regards to the NHS. First, we consider the influence of views regarding one of the most contentious issues in the referendum campaign: Vote Leave's claim that the 'savings' from EU membership could alternatively be used to provide additional funding for the NHS. We find that views about NHS underfunding had a relatively small, but statistically significant, effect on leave voting even after controlling for a range of socio-demographic and economic variables. However, the magnitude of this effect is reduced and becomes insignificant when health-related and cultural controls are added. Second, we examine how NHS workers voted relative to others in employment, and find that a relatively high proportion was actually leave voters. Finally, we analyse whether individuals thought that Brexit would have a positive or negative impact on the NHS, as well as the reason or reasons for their view. We find that supporters of the Conservative party were by far the most likely to think that Brexit would be good for the NHS.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

British Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： British Politics offers the only forum explicitly designed to promote research in British political studies, and seeks to provide a counterweight to the growing fragmentation of this field during recent years. To this end, the journal aims to promote a more holistic understanding of British politics by encouraging a closer integration between theoretical and empirical research, between historical and contemporary analyses, and by fostering a conception of British politics as a broad and multi-disciplinary field of study. This incorporates a range of sub-fields, including psephology, policy analysis, regional studies, comparative politics, institutional analysis, political theory, political economy, historical analysis, cultural studies and social policy. While recognising the validity and the importance of research into specific aspects of British politics, the journal takes it to be a guiding principle that such research is more useful, and indeed meaningful, if it is related to the field of British politics in a broader and fuller sense. The scope of the journal will therefore be broad, incorporating a range of research papers and review articles from all theoretical perspectives, and on all aspects of British politics, including policy developments, institutional change and political behaviour. Priority will, however, be given to contributions which link contemporary developments in British politics to theoretical and/or historical analyses. The aim is as much to encourage the development of empirical research that is theoretically rigorous and informed, as it is to encourage the empirical application of theoretical work (or at least to encourage theorists to explicitly signify how their work could be applied in an empirical manner).