长期服用强力霉素能改善哮喘患者的肺功能吗:一项开放的前瞻性现实世界观察的结果

P. Bhattacharyya, Soumen Das, D. Saha, P. Bhattacherjee
{"title":"长期服用强力霉素能改善哮喘患者的肺功能吗:一项开放的前瞻性现实世界观察的结果","authors":"P. Bhattacharyya, Soumen Das, D. Saha, P. Bhattacherjee","doi":"10.4103/jacp.jacp_7_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases and IgE could be a prospective target of treating inflammation and remodelling of asthma. Doxycycline, a known antibiotic may qualify for the job for having both the properties. Objective: To look for effect on long term add-on oral doxycycline in patients of asthma. Methods: In an open prospective, real-world observation, a cohort of asthmatics was given to choose treatment either with a “standard” therapy (long-acting β-2 agonist + inhaled corticosteroid) or with the same and add-on long term doxycycline orally. The changes in postbronchodilator FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25–75 were noted for comparison with repeat spirometry after nearly a year. Results: The two groups (standard therapy alone [n = 73] and standard therapy plus doxycycline [n = 72]) were similar (p < 0.05) as regards to age and BMI, but the subjects opting for add-on doxycycline had significantly lower baseline postbronchodilator FEV1 (1.25 ± 0.50 and 1.66 ± 0.73 Litres; p < 0.0001). Both the groups had received treatment for similar length of time (346.89 ± 269.61 and 335.82 ± 274.51 days, respectively). The add-on doxycycline group had a significant improvement in absolute value of postbronchodilator FEV1 (130 mL [p = 0.0000]), whereas the subjects on standard therapy alone showed a reduction (70 mL [p = 0.027]) compared to the baseline values. There was a parallel increase in FEV1/FVC (p < 0.005) and FEF25-75 (p < 0.0001) in the doxycycline-treated patients, suggesting an overall improvement in airflow limitations. Conclusion: The add-on oral doxycycline tolerated well on long term and resulted in a significant improvement in spirometric indices of airflow limitations in the asthmatics. The observation deserves further validation.","PeriodicalId":30411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can long term add-on doxycycline improve lung function in asthma: The result of an open prospective real-world observation\",\"authors\":\"P. Bhattacharyya, Soumen Das, D. Saha, P. Bhattacherjee\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jacp.jacp_7_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases and IgE could be a prospective target of treating inflammation and remodelling of asthma. Doxycycline, a known antibiotic may qualify for the job for having both the properties. Objective: To look for effect on long term add-on oral doxycycline in patients of asthma. Methods: In an open prospective, real-world observation, a cohort of asthmatics was given to choose treatment either with a “standard” therapy (long-acting β-2 agonist + inhaled corticosteroid) or with the same and add-on long term doxycycline orally. The changes in postbronchodilator FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25–75 were noted for comparison with repeat spirometry after nearly a year. Results: The two groups (standard therapy alone [n = 73] and standard therapy plus doxycycline [n = 72]) were similar (p < 0.05) as regards to age and BMI, but the subjects opting for add-on doxycycline had significantly lower baseline postbronchodilator FEV1 (1.25 ± 0.50 and 1.66 ± 0.73 Litres; p < 0.0001). Both the groups had received treatment for similar length of time (346.89 ± 269.61 and 335.82 ± 274.51 days, respectively). The add-on doxycycline group had a significant improvement in absolute value of postbronchodilator FEV1 (130 mL [p = 0.0000]), whereas the subjects on standard therapy alone showed a reduction (70 mL [p = 0.027]) compared to the baseline values. There was a parallel increase in FEV1/FVC (p < 0.005) and FEF25-75 (p < 0.0001) in the doxycycline-treated patients, suggesting an overall improvement in airflow limitations. Conclusion: The add-on oral doxycycline tolerated well on long term and resulted in a significant improvement in spirometric indices of airflow limitations in the asthmatics. The observation deserves further validation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jacp.jacp_7_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jacp.jacp_7_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抑制基质金属蛋白酶和IgE可能是治疗哮喘炎症和哮喘重构的潜在靶点。强力霉素,一种已知的抗生素,可能有资格胜任这项工作,因为它具有这两种特性。目的:观察长期加用强力霉素治疗哮喘的疗效。方法:在一项开放的、前瞻性的、真实世界的观察中,一组哮喘患者被要求选择“标准”治疗(长效β-2激动剂+吸入皮质类固醇)或口服相同且附加的长期强力霉素。观察支气管扩张后FEV1、FEV1/FVC和FEF25-75的变化,与近一年后重复肺活量测定法进行比较。结果:两组(单独标准治疗[n = 73]和标准治疗加强力霉素[n = 72])在年龄和BMI方面相似(p < 0.05),但选择加强力霉素的受试者支气管扩张后基线FEV1显著降低(1.25±0.50和1.66±0.73升);P < 0.0001)。两组治疗时间相近,分别为346.89±269.61天和335.82±274.51天。加用强力霉素组支气管扩张剂后FEV1绝对值显著改善(130 mL [p = 0.0000]),而单独接受标准治疗的受试者与基线值相比,FEV1绝对值下降(70 mL [p = 0.027])。在强力霉素治疗的患者中,FEV1/FVC (p < 0.005)和FEF25-75 (p < 0.0001)平行增加,表明气流受限的总体改善。结论:加用强力霉素长期耐受性良好,可显著改善哮喘患者气流受限的肺活量指标。这一观察值得进一步证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can long term add-on doxycycline improve lung function in asthma: The result of an open prospective real-world observation
Background: The inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases and IgE could be a prospective target of treating inflammation and remodelling of asthma. Doxycycline, a known antibiotic may qualify for the job for having both the properties. Objective: To look for effect on long term add-on oral doxycycline in patients of asthma. Methods: In an open prospective, real-world observation, a cohort of asthmatics was given to choose treatment either with a “standard” therapy (long-acting β-2 agonist + inhaled corticosteroid) or with the same and add-on long term doxycycline orally. The changes in postbronchodilator FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25–75 were noted for comparison with repeat spirometry after nearly a year. Results: The two groups (standard therapy alone [n = 73] and standard therapy plus doxycycline [n = 72]) were similar (p < 0.05) as regards to age and BMI, but the subjects opting for add-on doxycycline had significantly lower baseline postbronchodilator FEV1 (1.25 ± 0.50 and 1.66 ± 0.73 Litres; p < 0.0001). Both the groups had received treatment for similar length of time (346.89 ± 269.61 and 335.82 ± 274.51 days, respectively). The add-on doxycycline group had a significant improvement in absolute value of postbronchodilator FEV1 (130 mL [p = 0.0000]), whereas the subjects on standard therapy alone showed a reduction (70 mL [p = 0.027]) compared to the baseline values. There was a parallel increase in FEV1/FVC (p < 0.005) and FEF25-75 (p < 0.0001) in the doxycycline-treated patients, suggesting an overall improvement in airflow limitations. Conclusion: The add-on oral doxycycline tolerated well on long term and resulted in a significant improvement in spirometric indices of airflow limitations in the asthmatics. The observation deserves further validation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信