《解放绅士:19世纪南方女性音乐创作》作者:坎迪斯·贝利。厄巴纳:伊利诺伊大学出版社,2021年。

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 N/A MUSIC
Aldona Dye
{"title":"《解放绅士:19世纪南方女性音乐创作》作者:坎迪斯·贝利。厄巴纳:伊利诺伊大学出版社,2021年。","authors":"Aldona Dye","doi":"10.1017/S1752196323000068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robin presents to me overwhelming evidence of Bang on a Can’s deep embrace of neoliberalism, but he never considers the impact of neoliberalism as an ideology that shapes music. This is especially striking given composers such as Cornelius Cardew and Ivan Tcherepnin and classmates of Lang, Gordon, and Wolfe are quoted in the book voicing sincere objections to capitalism. Robin, however, never deeply engages with such critiques. Race and gender are similarly considered here only with reference to Bang on aCan’s claim that, in relation to classicalmusicmore generally, they improved the racial and gender make-up of their programs. These are important issues that continue to trouble many in the field. A lack of stated aims beyond Robin’s descriptions of the book’s contents exacerbates these omissions. The resulting arguments may thus ultimately be frustrating to those searching for ways to imagine a better future for newmusic. In summary, Robin’s work presents a compelling account of Bang on aCan. It offers useful insights for researchers of classical music, especially those interested in new music, its funding, and its position in the recording industry in the late 1980s and 1990s. The book is eminently readable at the non-specialist level, suitable for undergraduates.","PeriodicalId":42557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for American Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unbinding Gentility: Women Making Music in the Nineteenth Century South By Candace Bailey. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2021.\",\"authors\":\"Aldona Dye\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1752196323000068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robin presents to me overwhelming evidence of Bang on a Can’s deep embrace of neoliberalism, but he never considers the impact of neoliberalism as an ideology that shapes music. This is especially striking given composers such as Cornelius Cardew and Ivan Tcherepnin and classmates of Lang, Gordon, and Wolfe are quoted in the book voicing sincere objections to capitalism. Robin, however, never deeply engages with such critiques. Race and gender are similarly considered here only with reference to Bang on aCan’s claim that, in relation to classicalmusicmore generally, they improved the racial and gender make-up of their programs. These are important issues that continue to trouble many in the field. A lack of stated aims beyond Robin’s descriptions of the book’s contents exacerbates these omissions. The resulting arguments may thus ultimately be frustrating to those searching for ways to imagine a better future for newmusic. In summary, Robin’s work presents a compelling account of Bang on aCan. It offers useful insights for researchers of classical music, especially those interested in new music, its funding, and its position in the recording industry in the late 1980s and 1990s. The book is eminently readable at the non-specialist level, suitable for undergraduates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for American Music\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for American Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752196323000068\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for American Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752196323000068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Robin向我展示了Bang on a Can对新自由主义的深刻拥抱的压倒性证据,但他从未将新自由主义作为一种塑造音乐的意识形态来看待。这一点尤其引人注目,因为书中引用了科尼利厄斯·卡杜和伊万·切列普宁等作曲家以及朗、戈登和沃尔夫的同学对资本主义的真诚反对。然而,罗宾从来没有深入参与过这样的批评。种族和性别在这里被类似地考虑,只是参考Bang on aCan的说法,即与古典音乐相比,他们改善了节目的种族和性别构成。这些都是继续困扰该领域许多人的重要问题。除了罗宾对书中内容的描述之外,缺乏明确的目标加剧了这些遗漏。因此,对于那些正在寻找新音乐更美好未来的人来说,由此产生的争论最终可能会令人沮丧。总之,Robin的作品对Bang on aCan进行了令人信服的描述。它为古典音乐研究人员提供了有用的见解,尤其是那些对新音乐、新音乐的资金以及新音乐在20世纪80年代末和90年代唱片业中的地位感兴趣的人。这本书在非专业水平上可读性很强,适合本科生阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unbinding Gentility: Women Making Music in the Nineteenth Century South By Candace Bailey. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2021.
Robin presents to me overwhelming evidence of Bang on a Can’s deep embrace of neoliberalism, but he never considers the impact of neoliberalism as an ideology that shapes music. This is especially striking given composers such as Cornelius Cardew and Ivan Tcherepnin and classmates of Lang, Gordon, and Wolfe are quoted in the book voicing sincere objections to capitalism. Robin, however, never deeply engages with such critiques. Race and gender are similarly considered here only with reference to Bang on aCan’s claim that, in relation to classicalmusicmore generally, they improved the racial and gender make-up of their programs. These are important issues that continue to trouble many in the field. A lack of stated aims beyond Robin’s descriptions of the book’s contents exacerbates these omissions. The resulting arguments may thus ultimately be frustrating to those searching for ways to imagine a better future for newmusic. In summary, Robin’s work presents a compelling account of Bang on aCan. It offers useful insights for researchers of classical music, especially those interested in new music, its funding, and its position in the recording industry in the late 1980s and 1990s. The book is eminently readable at the non-specialist level, suitable for undergraduates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信