Dōgen和Meister Eckhart关于分离/非连接*

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
Minlib Dallh
{"title":"Dōgen和Meister Eckhart关于分离/非连接*","authors":"Minlib Dallh","doi":"10.1080/20465726.2018.1472415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Dōgen and Eckhart are two of the most influential spiritual masters of the thirteenth century. Though from completely different religious traditions, they share stark similarity concerning detachment/non-attachment. Both masters were criticized, condemned and neglected for centuries. They are, however, regarded with great respect by Zen Buddhists, Catholic monks, and even by seminal philosophers such as Kitarō Nashida and Martin Heidegger. What makes these two masters so attractive to disparate groups and to unlikely places such as the Abbey of Gethsemane in Kentucky and Kyoto University in Japan?","PeriodicalId":40432,"journal":{"name":"Medieval Mystical Theology","volume":"27 1","pages":"22 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20465726.2018.1472415","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dōgen and Meister Eckhart on Detachment/Non-attachment*\",\"authors\":\"Minlib Dallh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20465726.2018.1472415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Dōgen and Eckhart are two of the most influential spiritual masters of the thirteenth century. Though from completely different religious traditions, they share stark similarity concerning detachment/non-attachment. Both masters were criticized, condemned and neglected for centuries. They are, however, regarded with great respect by Zen Buddhists, Catholic monks, and even by seminal philosophers such as Kitarō Nashida and Martin Heidegger. What makes these two masters so attractive to disparate groups and to unlikely places such as the Abbey of Gethsemane in Kentucky and Kyoto University in Japan?\",\"PeriodicalId\":40432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medieval Mystical Theology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20465726.2018.1472415\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medieval Mystical Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2018.1472415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medieval Mystical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2018.1472415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Dōgen和埃克哈特是13世纪最有影响力的两位精神大师。虽然他们来自完全不同的宗教传统,但他们在超然/不依恋方面有着明显的相似之处。几个世纪以来,两位大师都受到批评、谴责和忽视。然而,禅宗佛教徒、天主教僧侣,甚至是有影响的哲学家,如北田和马丁·海德格尔,都非常尊重他们。是什么让这两位大师如此吸引不同的群体和不太可能的地方,如肯塔基的客西马尼修道院和日本的京都大学?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dōgen and Meister Eckhart on Detachment/Non-attachment*
ABSTRACT Dōgen and Eckhart are two of the most influential spiritual masters of the thirteenth century. Though from completely different religious traditions, they share stark similarity concerning detachment/non-attachment. Both masters were criticized, condemned and neglected for centuries. They are, however, regarded with great respect by Zen Buddhists, Catholic monks, and even by seminal philosophers such as Kitarō Nashida and Martin Heidegger. What makes these two masters so attractive to disparate groups and to unlikely places such as the Abbey of Gethsemane in Kentucky and Kyoto University in Japan?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信