基于近210万年古数据的气候敏感性状态依赖量化

P. Köhler, L. Stap, A. S. Heydt, B. Boer, R. Wal, J. Bloch‐Johnson
{"title":"基于近210万年古数据的气候敏感性状态依赖量化","authors":"P. Köhler, L. Stap, A. S. Heydt, B. Boer, R. Wal, J. Bloch‐Johnson","doi":"10.1002/2017PA003190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evidence from both data and models indicates that specific equilibrium climate sensitivity S[X] — the global annual mean surface temperature change (ΔTg) as a response to a change in radiative forcing X (ΔR[X]) — is state-dependent. Such a state dependency implies that the best fit in the scatter plot of ΔTg versus ΔR[X] is not a linear regression, but can be some non-linear or even non-smooth function. While for the conventional linear case the slope (gradient) of the regression is correctly interpreted as the specific equilibrium climate sensitivity S[X], the interpretation is not straightforward in the non-linear case. We here explain how such a state-dependent scatter plot needs to be interpreted, and provide a theoretical understanding — or generalization — how to quantify S[X] in the non-linear case. Finally, from data covering the last 2.1 Myr we show that — due to state dependency — the specific equilibrium climate sensitivity which considers radiative forcing of CO2 and land ice sheet (LI) albedo, S[CO2,LI], is larger during interglacial states than during glacial conditions by more than a factor two.","PeriodicalId":19882,"journal":{"name":"Paleoceanography","volume":"32 1","pages":"1102-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/2017PA003190","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A State-Dependent Quantification of Climate Sensitivity Based on Paleodata of the Last 2.1 Million Years\",\"authors\":\"P. Köhler, L. Stap, A. S. Heydt, B. Boer, R. Wal, J. Bloch‐Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2017PA003190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evidence from both data and models indicates that specific equilibrium climate sensitivity S[X] — the global annual mean surface temperature change (ΔTg) as a response to a change in radiative forcing X (ΔR[X]) — is state-dependent. Such a state dependency implies that the best fit in the scatter plot of ΔTg versus ΔR[X] is not a linear regression, but can be some non-linear or even non-smooth function. While for the conventional linear case the slope (gradient) of the regression is correctly interpreted as the specific equilibrium climate sensitivity S[X], the interpretation is not straightforward in the non-linear case. We here explain how such a state-dependent scatter plot needs to be interpreted, and provide a theoretical understanding — or generalization — how to quantify S[X] in the non-linear case. Finally, from data covering the last 2.1 Myr we show that — due to state dependency — the specific equilibrium climate sensitivity which considers radiative forcing of CO2 and land ice sheet (LI) albedo, S[CO2,LI], is larger during interglacial states than during glacial conditions by more than a factor two.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paleoceanography\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"1102-1114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/2017PA003190\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paleoceanography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/2017PA003190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paleoceanography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/2017PA003190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

来自数据和模式的证据表明,特定平衡气候敏感性S[X]——作为对辐射强迫X变化的响应的全球年平均地表温度变化(ΔTg) (ΔR[X])——是依赖于状态的。这种状态依赖性意味着ΔTg与ΔR[X]的散点图的最佳拟合不是线性回归,而可能是一些非线性甚至非光滑函数。虽然对于传统的线性情况,回归的斜率(梯度)可以正确地解释为特定平衡气候敏感性S[X],但在非线性情况下,解释并不简单。我们在这里解释了如何解释这种状态相关的散点图,并提供了一个理论理解-或概括-如何在非线性情况下量化S[X]。最后,从覆盖最近2.1 Myr的数据中,我们表明——由于状态依赖性——考虑CO2辐射强迫和陆地冰盖(LI)反照率的特定平衡气候敏感性S[CO2,LI]在间冰期比冰期大2倍以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A State-Dependent Quantification of Climate Sensitivity Based on Paleodata of the Last 2.1 Million Years
The evidence from both data and models indicates that specific equilibrium climate sensitivity S[X] — the global annual mean surface temperature change (ΔTg) as a response to a change in radiative forcing X (ΔR[X]) — is state-dependent. Such a state dependency implies that the best fit in the scatter plot of ΔTg versus ΔR[X] is not a linear regression, but can be some non-linear or even non-smooth function. While for the conventional linear case the slope (gradient) of the regression is correctly interpreted as the specific equilibrium climate sensitivity S[X], the interpretation is not straightforward in the non-linear case. We here explain how such a state-dependent scatter plot needs to be interpreted, and provide a theoretical understanding — or generalization — how to quantify S[X] in the non-linear case. Finally, from data covering the last 2.1 Myr we show that — due to state dependency — the specific equilibrium climate sensitivity which considers radiative forcing of CO2 and land ice sheet (LI) albedo, S[CO2,LI], is larger during interglacial states than during glacial conditions by more than a factor two.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Paleoceanography
Paleoceanography 地学-地球科学综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信