首个基于PACS集成的人工智能软件工具,用于临床常规CT的快速全自动身体成分分析

Nick Lasse Beetz, Christoph Maier, Laura Segger, Seyd Shnayien, Tobias Daniel Trippel, Norbert Lindow, Khaled Bousabarah, Malte Westerhoff, Uli Fehrenbach, Dominik Geisel
{"title":"首个基于PACS集成的人工智能软件工具,用于临床常规CT的快速全自动身体成分分析","authors":"Nick Lasse Beetz,&nbsp;Christoph Maier,&nbsp;Laura Segger,&nbsp;Seyd Shnayien,&nbsp;Tobias Daniel Trippel,&nbsp;Norbert Lindow,&nbsp;Khaled Bousabarah,&nbsp;Malte Westerhoff,&nbsp;Uli Fehrenbach,&nbsp;Dominik Geisel","doi":"10.1002/crt2.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To externally evaluate the first picture archiving communications system (PACS)-integrated artificial intelligence (AI)-based workflow, trained to automatically detect a predefined computed tomography (CT) slice at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) and automatically perform complete image segmentation for analysis of CT body composition and to compare its performance with that of an established semi-automatic segmentation tool regarding speed and accuracy of tissue area calculation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>For fully automatic analysis of body composition with L3 recognition, U-Nets were trained (Visage) and compared with a conventional image segmentation software (TomoVision). Tissue was differentiated into psoas muscle, skeletal muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Mid-L3 level images from randomly selected DICOM slice files of 20 CT scans acquired with various imaging protocols were segmented with both methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Success rate of AI-based L3 recognition was 100%. Compared with semi-automatic, fully automatic AI-based image segmentation yielded relative differences of 0.22% and 0.16% for skeletal muscle, 0.47% and 0.49% for psoas muscle, 0.42% and 0.42% for VAT and 0.18% and 0.18% for SAT. AI-based fully automatic segmentation was significantly faster than semi-automatic segmentation (3 ± 0 s vs. 170 ± 40 s, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, for User 1 and 152 ± 40 s, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, for User 2).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Rapid fully automatic AI-based, PACS-integrated assessment of body composition yields identical results without transfer of critical patient data. Additional metabolic information can be inserted into the patient's image report and offered to the referring clinicians.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73543,"journal":{"name":"JCSM clinical reports","volume":"7 1","pages":"3-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/crt2.44","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First PACS-integrated artificial intelligence-based software tool for rapid and fully automatic analysis of body composition from CT in clinical routine\",\"authors\":\"Nick Lasse Beetz,&nbsp;Christoph Maier,&nbsp;Laura Segger,&nbsp;Seyd Shnayien,&nbsp;Tobias Daniel Trippel,&nbsp;Norbert Lindow,&nbsp;Khaled Bousabarah,&nbsp;Malte Westerhoff,&nbsp;Uli Fehrenbach,&nbsp;Dominik Geisel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/crt2.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>To externally evaluate the first picture archiving communications system (PACS)-integrated artificial intelligence (AI)-based workflow, trained to automatically detect a predefined computed tomography (CT) slice at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) and automatically perform complete image segmentation for analysis of CT body composition and to compare its performance with that of an established semi-automatic segmentation tool regarding speed and accuracy of tissue area calculation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>For fully automatic analysis of body composition with L3 recognition, U-Nets were trained (Visage) and compared with a conventional image segmentation software (TomoVision). Tissue was differentiated into psoas muscle, skeletal muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Mid-L3 level images from randomly selected DICOM slice files of 20 CT scans acquired with various imaging protocols were segmented with both methods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Success rate of AI-based L3 recognition was 100%. Compared with semi-automatic, fully automatic AI-based image segmentation yielded relative differences of 0.22% and 0.16% for skeletal muscle, 0.47% and 0.49% for psoas muscle, 0.42% and 0.42% for VAT and 0.18% and 0.18% for SAT. AI-based fully automatic segmentation was significantly faster than semi-automatic segmentation (3 ± 0 s vs. 170 ± 40 s, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, for User 1 and 152 ± 40 s, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, for User 2).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rapid fully automatic AI-based, PACS-integrated assessment of body composition yields identical results without transfer of critical patient data. Additional metabolic information can be inserted into the patient's image report and offered to the referring clinicians.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCSM clinical reports\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"3-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/crt2.44\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCSM clinical reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crt2.44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM clinical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crt2.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

外部评估第一个图像存档通信系统(PACS) -集成人工智能(AI) -基于工作流程,训练自动检测第三腰椎(L3)的预定义计算机断层扫描(CT)切片,并自动执行完整的图像分割以分析CT体成分,并将其性能与已建立的半自动分割工具进行比较关于组织面积计算的速度和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

First PACS-integrated artificial intelligence-based software tool for rapid and fully automatic analysis of body composition from CT in clinical routine

First PACS-integrated artificial intelligence-based software tool for rapid and fully automatic analysis of body composition from CT in clinical routine

Background

To externally evaluate the first picture archiving communications system (PACS)-integrated artificial intelligence (AI)-based workflow, trained to automatically detect a predefined computed tomography (CT) slice at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) and automatically perform complete image segmentation for analysis of CT body composition and to compare its performance with that of an established semi-automatic segmentation tool regarding speed and accuracy of tissue area calculation.

Methods

For fully automatic analysis of body composition with L3 recognition, U-Nets were trained (Visage) and compared with a conventional image segmentation software (TomoVision). Tissue was differentiated into psoas muscle, skeletal muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Mid-L3 level images from randomly selected DICOM slice files of 20 CT scans acquired with various imaging protocols were segmented with both methods.

Results

Success rate of AI-based L3 recognition was 100%. Compared with semi-automatic, fully automatic AI-based image segmentation yielded relative differences of 0.22% and 0.16% for skeletal muscle, 0.47% and 0.49% for psoas muscle, 0.42% and 0.42% for VAT and 0.18% and 0.18% for SAT. AI-based fully automatic segmentation was significantly faster than semi-automatic segmentation (3 ± 0 s vs. 170 ± 40 s, P < 0.001, for User 1 and 152 ± 40 s, P < 0.001, for User 2).

Conclusion

Rapid fully automatic AI-based, PACS-integrated assessment of body composition yields identical results without transfer of critical patient data. Additional metabolic information can be inserted into the patient's image report and offered to the referring clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信