多米提安:塔西佗的《日耳曼尼亚》和多米提安的回忆

G. Andrews
{"title":"多米提安:塔西佗的《日耳曼尼亚》和多米提安的回忆","authors":"G. Andrews","doi":"10.5406/illiclasstud.44.2.0408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:For over fifteen years before the production of Tacitus's Germania, the title Germanicus had been prominent in Rome, claimed not only by Domitian but also by both Nerva and Trajan. Tacitus famously refutes military success in his account. As this article shows, however, its memory is consistently invoked in its basic structure. Especially through allusions to Caesar, Tacitus introduces a model of historiographical narrative concerning Roman conquest, only to reject it. The result is a tension between the ongoing public presence of Rome's immediate past and its official erasure, forming a commentary on the very process of imperial memory sanction.","PeriodicalId":81501,"journal":{"name":"Illinois classical studies","volume":"44 1","pages":"408 - 429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Domitianus Germanicus: Tacitus's Germania and the Memory of Domitian\",\"authors\":\"G. Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/illiclasstud.44.2.0408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:For over fifteen years before the production of Tacitus's Germania, the title Germanicus had been prominent in Rome, claimed not only by Domitian but also by both Nerva and Trajan. Tacitus famously refutes military success in his account. As this article shows, however, its memory is consistently invoked in its basic structure. Especially through allusions to Caesar, Tacitus introduces a model of historiographical narrative concerning Roman conquest, only to reject it. The result is a tension between the ongoing public presence of Rome's immediate past and its official erasure, forming a commentary on the very process of imperial memory sanction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Illinois classical studies\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"408 - 429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Illinois classical studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/illiclasstud.44.2.0408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illinois classical studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/illiclasstud.44.2.0408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:在塔西陀的《日耳曼尼亚》问世之前的十五年多时间里,日耳曼尼亚这个头衔在罗马一直很突出,不仅是多米提安,内尔瓦和图拉真都声称拥有这个头衔。塔西陀在他的叙述中驳斥了军事上的成功。然而,正如本文所示,它的内存在其基本结构中始终被调用。尤其是通过对凯撒的影射,塔西陀引入了一种关于罗马征服的历史叙事模式,但却拒绝了它。其结果是,罗马直接历史的持续公开存在与其官方抹去之间的紧张关系,形成了对帝国记忆制裁过程的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Domitianus Germanicus: Tacitus's Germania and the Memory of Domitian
Abstract:For over fifteen years before the production of Tacitus's Germania, the title Germanicus had been prominent in Rome, claimed not only by Domitian but also by both Nerva and Trajan. Tacitus famously refutes military success in his account. As this article shows, however, its memory is consistently invoked in its basic structure. Especially through allusions to Caesar, Tacitus introduces a model of historiographical narrative concerning Roman conquest, only to reject it. The result is a tension between the ongoing public presence of Rome's immediate past and its official erasure, forming a commentary on the very process of imperial memory sanction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信