克罗地亚业余和专业古典歌手的洪亮嗓音

Q4 Social Sciences
Sigurnost Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.31306/s.65.2.1
Roko Žaja, M. Milošević, Marija Jozić, Ana Butković, Mihael Ries
{"title":"克罗地亚业余和专业古典歌手的洪亮嗓音","authors":"Roko Žaja, M. Milošević, Marija Jozić, Ana Butković, Mihael Ries","doi":"10.31306/s.65.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to describe singing voice handicap in the Croatian professional and amateur classical singers. This cross-sectional study included 69 professionals (median age 47.5 interquartile range 42.0-55.8 years) and 41 amateurs (median age 30.0, interquartile range 25.0-41.0 years). Participants completed the Croatian version of the Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI-36), self-rated the severity of singing voice problem on another scale and answered questions about their age, gender, voice type and self-perceived average number of singing hours per week in the past three months. Cronbach’s alpha of the Croatian version of the SVHI was 0.97 in amateurs, and 0.98 in professionals. SVHI scores significantly differed across the categories of self-perceived singing voice problem in amateurs (P=0.001) and professionals (P<0.001). Median SVHI score was 16.7 (interquartile range 7.6-29.2) in amateurs and 13.8 (interquartile range 5.9-30.2) in professionals. Higher SVHI score was associated with more severe self-perceived singing voice problem in amateurs (ρ=0.63, P<0.001) and professionals (ρ=0.68, P<0.001). Amateurs and professionals did not significantly differ in the self-perceived singing voice problem (P=0.698), nor the SVHI score (P=0.538). Compared to the professionals, amateurs more often reported voice breaks (P=0.009) and the trouble with loud singing (P=0.020), and were less concerned about losing money because of their singing problems (P=0.022). Croatian classical singers mostly had mild singing voice problems. Voice difficulties in amateurs indicate the importance of learning vocal technique. It is necessary to balance work commitments with vocal rest to preserve workability in professional classical singers.","PeriodicalId":53654,"journal":{"name":"Sigurnost","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poteškoće s pjevačkim glasom u hrvatskih amaterskih i profesionalnih klasičnih pjevača\",\"authors\":\"Roko Žaja, M. Milošević, Marija Jozić, Ana Butković, Mihael Ries\",\"doi\":\"10.31306/s.65.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study was to describe singing voice handicap in the Croatian professional and amateur classical singers. This cross-sectional study included 69 professionals (median age 47.5 interquartile range 42.0-55.8 years) and 41 amateurs (median age 30.0, interquartile range 25.0-41.0 years). Participants completed the Croatian version of the Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI-36), self-rated the severity of singing voice problem on another scale and answered questions about their age, gender, voice type and self-perceived average number of singing hours per week in the past three months. Cronbach’s alpha of the Croatian version of the SVHI was 0.97 in amateurs, and 0.98 in professionals. SVHI scores significantly differed across the categories of self-perceived singing voice problem in amateurs (P=0.001) and professionals (P<0.001). Median SVHI score was 16.7 (interquartile range 7.6-29.2) in amateurs and 13.8 (interquartile range 5.9-30.2) in professionals. Higher SVHI score was associated with more severe self-perceived singing voice problem in amateurs (ρ=0.63, P<0.001) and professionals (ρ=0.68, P<0.001). Amateurs and professionals did not significantly differ in the self-perceived singing voice problem (P=0.698), nor the SVHI score (P=0.538). Compared to the professionals, amateurs more often reported voice breaks (P=0.009) and the trouble with loud singing (P=0.020), and were less concerned about losing money because of their singing problems (P=0.022). Croatian classical singers mostly had mild singing voice problems. Voice difficulties in amateurs indicate the importance of learning vocal technique. It is necessary to balance work commitments with vocal rest to preserve workability in professional classical singers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sigurnost\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sigurnost\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31306/s.65.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sigurnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31306/s.65.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是描述克罗地亚专业和业余古典歌手的嗓音障碍。本横断面研究包括69名专业人士(年龄中位数为47.5岁,四分位数范围为42.0-55.8岁)和41名业余人士(年龄中位数为30.0岁,四分位数范围为25.0-41.0岁)。参与者完成了克罗地亚版的歌唱声音障碍指数(SVHI-36),在另一个尺度上对歌唱声音问题的严重程度进行了自我评估,并回答了有关他们的年龄、性别、声音类型和过去三个月每周自我感觉的平均歌唱小时数的问题。克罗地亚版本的SVHI的克朗巴赫alpha值在业余爱好者中为0.97,在专业人士中为0.98。在自我感知的声乐问题中,SVHI得分在业余爱好者(P=0.001)和专业人士(P<0.001)之间存在显著差异。业余运动员的SVHI得分中位数为16.7(四分位间距7.6-29.2),专业运动员为13.8(四分位间距5.9-30.2)。较高的SVHI分数与更严重的自我感觉声乐问题相关,在业余(ρ=0.63, P<0.001)和专业(ρ=0.68, P<0.001)。业余和专业人员在自我感知的歌声问题上无显著差异(P=0.698),在SVHI得分上也无显著差异(P=0.538)。与专业歌手相比,业余歌手更多地报告了声音中断(P=0.009)和大声唱歌的麻烦(P=0.020),并且较少担心因为唱歌问题而损失金钱(P=0.022)。克罗地亚古典歌手大多有轻微的嗓音问题。业余爱好者的声音困难表明学习声乐技术的重要性。有必要平衡工作承诺与声乐休息,以保持工作能力的专业古典歌手。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poteškoće s pjevačkim glasom u hrvatskih amaterskih i profesionalnih klasičnih pjevača
The aim of the study was to describe singing voice handicap in the Croatian professional and amateur classical singers. This cross-sectional study included 69 professionals (median age 47.5 interquartile range 42.0-55.8 years) and 41 amateurs (median age 30.0, interquartile range 25.0-41.0 years). Participants completed the Croatian version of the Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI-36), self-rated the severity of singing voice problem on another scale and answered questions about their age, gender, voice type and self-perceived average number of singing hours per week in the past three months. Cronbach’s alpha of the Croatian version of the SVHI was 0.97 in amateurs, and 0.98 in professionals. SVHI scores significantly differed across the categories of self-perceived singing voice problem in amateurs (P=0.001) and professionals (P<0.001). Median SVHI score was 16.7 (interquartile range 7.6-29.2) in amateurs and 13.8 (interquartile range 5.9-30.2) in professionals. Higher SVHI score was associated with more severe self-perceived singing voice problem in amateurs (ρ=0.63, P<0.001) and professionals (ρ=0.68, P<0.001). Amateurs and professionals did not significantly differ in the self-perceived singing voice problem (P=0.698), nor the SVHI score (P=0.538). Compared to the professionals, amateurs more often reported voice breaks (P=0.009) and the trouble with loud singing (P=0.020), and were less concerned about losing money because of their singing problems (P=0.022). Croatian classical singers mostly had mild singing voice problems. Voice difficulties in amateurs indicate the importance of learning vocal technique. It is necessary to balance work commitments with vocal rest to preserve workability in professional classical singers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sigurnost
Sigurnost Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信