{"title":"写马丘比丘。从本土主义视角看认识论采掘主义与城堡","authors":"J. Zanelli","doi":"10.1080/13569325.2021.2005003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I examine the reception of the so-called discovery of Machu Picchu and its subsequent reinterpretation by Cuzco’s intelligentsia. After its unearthing, the citadel of Machu Picchu was part of an intellectual discussion that took place in Cuzco and impacted a regional agenda that was constructed by indigenismo cusqueño. Here, I evaluate the historiographic writings about Machu Picchu in three different ways. First, as an act of “epistemological extractivism” perpetrated by the Yale archaeologist Hiram Bingham, who self-portrays as the heroic discoverer of the Inca citadel, eliminating previous local visitors from his texts. Second, I illuminate historical reassessments made by two major local intellectuals, Luis Enrique Valcárcel and José Uriel García, whose texts placed Machu Picchu under the large umbrella of Inca civilisation born in Cuzco. Third, I argue that the aesthetical interpretations of Machu Picchu exposed the differences within indigenismo cusqueño; after all, despite its regionalist discourse this movement was not composed by a homogeneous chorus of intellectuals.","PeriodicalId":56341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"569 - 585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing Machu Picchu. Epistemological Extractivism and the Citadel Through the Lens of indigenismo cusqueño\",\"authors\":\"J. Zanelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13569325.2021.2005003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I examine the reception of the so-called discovery of Machu Picchu and its subsequent reinterpretation by Cuzco’s intelligentsia. After its unearthing, the citadel of Machu Picchu was part of an intellectual discussion that took place in Cuzco and impacted a regional agenda that was constructed by indigenismo cusqueño. Here, I evaluate the historiographic writings about Machu Picchu in three different ways. First, as an act of “epistemological extractivism” perpetrated by the Yale archaeologist Hiram Bingham, who self-portrays as the heroic discoverer of the Inca citadel, eliminating previous local visitors from his texts. Second, I illuminate historical reassessments made by two major local intellectuals, Luis Enrique Valcárcel and José Uriel García, whose texts placed Machu Picchu under the large umbrella of Inca civilisation born in Cuzco. Third, I argue that the aesthetical interpretations of Machu Picchu exposed the differences within indigenismo cusqueño; after all, despite its regionalist discourse this movement was not composed by a homogeneous chorus of intellectuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"569 - 585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2021.2005003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2021.2005003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Writing Machu Picchu. Epistemological Extractivism and the Citadel Through the Lens of indigenismo cusqueño
In this article, I examine the reception of the so-called discovery of Machu Picchu and its subsequent reinterpretation by Cuzco’s intelligentsia. After its unearthing, the citadel of Machu Picchu was part of an intellectual discussion that took place in Cuzco and impacted a regional agenda that was constructed by indigenismo cusqueño. Here, I evaluate the historiographic writings about Machu Picchu in three different ways. First, as an act of “epistemological extractivism” perpetrated by the Yale archaeologist Hiram Bingham, who self-portrays as the heroic discoverer of the Inca citadel, eliminating previous local visitors from his texts. Second, I illuminate historical reassessments made by two major local intellectuals, Luis Enrique Valcárcel and José Uriel García, whose texts placed Machu Picchu under the large umbrella of Inca civilisation born in Cuzco. Third, I argue that the aesthetical interpretations of Machu Picchu exposed the differences within indigenismo cusqueño; after all, despite its regionalist discourse this movement was not composed by a homogeneous chorus of intellectuals.