写马丘比丘。从本土主义视角看认识论采掘主义与城堡

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
J. Zanelli
{"title":"写马丘比丘。从本土主义视角看认识论采掘主义与城堡","authors":"J. Zanelli","doi":"10.1080/13569325.2021.2005003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I examine the reception of the so-called discovery of Machu Picchu and its subsequent reinterpretation by Cuzco’s intelligentsia. After its unearthing, the citadel of Machu Picchu was part of an intellectual discussion that took place in Cuzco and impacted a regional agenda that was constructed by indigenismo cusqueño. Here, I evaluate the historiographic writings about Machu Picchu in three different ways. First, as an act of “epistemological extractivism” perpetrated by the Yale archaeologist Hiram Bingham, who self-portrays as the heroic discoverer of the Inca citadel, eliminating previous local visitors from his texts. Second, I illuminate historical reassessments made by two major local intellectuals, Luis Enrique Valcárcel and José Uriel García, whose texts placed Machu Picchu under the large umbrella of Inca civilisation born in Cuzco. Third, I argue that the aesthetical interpretations of Machu Picchu exposed the differences within indigenismo cusqueño; after all, despite its regionalist discourse this movement was not composed by a homogeneous chorus of intellectuals.","PeriodicalId":56341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"569 - 585"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing Machu Picchu. Epistemological Extractivism and the Citadel Through the Lens of indigenismo cusqueño\",\"authors\":\"J. Zanelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13569325.2021.2005003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I examine the reception of the so-called discovery of Machu Picchu and its subsequent reinterpretation by Cuzco’s intelligentsia. After its unearthing, the citadel of Machu Picchu was part of an intellectual discussion that took place in Cuzco and impacted a regional agenda that was constructed by indigenismo cusqueño. Here, I evaluate the historiographic writings about Machu Picchu in three different ways. First, as an act of “epistemological extractivism” perpetrated by the Yale archaeologist Hiram Bingham, who self-portrays as the heroic discoverer of the Inca citadel, eliminating previous local visitors from his texts. Second, I illuminate historical reassessments made by two major local intellectuals, Luis Enrique Valcárcel and José Uriel García, whose texts placed Machu Picchu under the large umbrella of Inca civilisation born in Cuzco. Third, I argue that the aesthetical interpretations of Machu Picchu exposed the differences within indigenismo cusqueño; after all, despite its regionalist discourse this movement was not composed by a homogeneous chorus of intellectuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"569 - 585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2021.2005003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2021.2005003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我考察了人们对所谓马丘比丘发现的接受程度,以及库斯科知识分子随后对马丘比丘发现的重新解释。马丘比丘城堡被发掘后,成为库斯科智力讨论的一部分,并影响了土著主义cusqueño构建的地区议程。在这里,我用三种不同的方式来评价关于马丘比丘的史学著作。首先,这是耶鲁大学考古学家海勒姆·宾厄姆(Hiram Bingham)的“认识论提取主义”行为,他把自己描绘成印加城堡的英雄发现者,把以前的当地游客从他的著作中抹去。其次,我阐明了当地两位主要知识分子路易斯·恩里克Valcárcel和约瑟夫·乌列尔García对历史的重新评估,他们的著作将马丘比丘置于诞生于库斯科的印加文明的大保护伞之下。第三,我认为马丘比丘的美学解释暴露了本土主义内部的差异cusqueño;毕竟,尽管有地方主义的话语,这场运动并不是由同质的知识分子合唱组成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Writing Machu Picchu. Epistemological Extractivism and the Citadel Through the Lens of indigenismo cusqueño
In this article, I examine the reception of the so-called discovery of Machu Picchu and its subsequent reinterpretation by Cuzco’s intelligentsia. After its unearthing, the citadel of Machu Picchu was part of an intellectual discussion that took place in Cuzco and impacted a regional agenda that was constructed by indigenismo cusqueño. Here, I evaluate the historiographic writings about Machu Picchu in three different ways. First, as an act of “epistemological extractivism” perpetrated by the Yale archaeologist Hiram Bingham, who self-portrays as the heroic discoverer of the Inca citadel, eliminating previous local visitors from his texts. Second, I illuminate historical reassessments made by two major local intellectuals, Luis Enrique Valcárcel and José Uriel García, whose texts placed Machu Picchu under the large umbrella of Inca civilisation born in Cuzco. Third, I argue that the aesthetical interpretations of Machu Picchu exposed the differences within indigenismo cusqueño; after all, despite its regionalist discourse this movement was not composed by a homogeneous chorus of intellectuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信