线粒体基因重排提示斑蝥亚科新属(鞘翅目)

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Yuxia Yang, Ya Kang, Junbo Tong, X. Ge, Xingke Yang, Haoyu Liu
{"title":"线粒体基因重排提示斑蝥亚科新属(鞘翅目)","authors":"Yuxia Yang, Ya Kang, Junbo Tong, X. Ge, Xingke Yang, Haoyu Liu","doi":"10.1111/zsc.12572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Cephalomalthinus semifumatus species group, referred to as the “semifumatus” group henceforth, is interesting because of its heterogeneous morphology resembling either Cephalomalthinus Pic, 1921 or Rhagonycha Eschscholtz, 1830. To elucidate its phylogenetic status, mitochondrial genomes of four species of the “semifumatus” group, 11 Cephalomalthinus species, and 11 Rhagonycha species were sequenced and examined. All analysed mitogenomes were similar with respect to genome size, nucleotide composition, and AT content. Surprisingly, a rearrangement of the trnW‐trnC and trnY genes was detected in the “semifumatus” group, presumably caused by tandem duplication and random loss events. Furthermore, genetic distance analyses showed that the proximity of the “semifumatus” group to Cephalomalthinus and to Rhagonycha was comparable to that between the latter two. Moreover, the produced phylogeny strongly supported the monophyly of the “semifumatus” group, and molecular clock analyses dated its divergence from Cephalomalthinus to 32.52 Ma. Thus, the new genus Amphimorphus gen. nov. is suggested to comprise the “semifumatus” group, in which the observed gene rearrangement was a synapomorphy. Moreover, morphological evidence regarding the unique structure of the aedeagus supported this separation. These results indicate that mitochondrial gene rearrangement provide important phylogenetic implications for revising Cephalomalthinus, a speciose genus that is puzzling in the morphology‐based taxonomy.","PeriodicalId":49334,"journal":{"name":"Zoologica Scripta","volume":"52 1","pages":"86 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitochondrial gene rearrangements suggest a new genus in the subfamily Cantharinae (Coleoptera)\",\"authors\":\"Yuxia Yang, Ya Kang, Junbo Tong, X. Ge, Xingke Yang, Haoyu Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/zsc.12572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Cephalomalthinus semifumatus species group, referred to as the “semifumatus” group henceforth, is interesting because of its heterogeneous morphology resembling either Cephalomalthinus Pic, 1921 or Rhagonycha Eschscholtz, 1830. To elucidate its phylogenetic status, mitochondrial genomes of four species of the “semifumatus” group, 11 Cephalomalthinus species, and 11 Rhagonycha species were sequenced and examined. All analysed mitogenomes were similar with respect to genome size, nucleotide composition, and AT content. Surprisingly, a rearrangement of the trnW‐trnC and trnY genes was detected in the “semifumatus” group, presumably caused by tandem duplication and random loss events. Furthermore, genetic distance analyses showed that the proximity of the “semifumatus” group to Cephalomalthinus and to Rhagonycha was comparable to that between the latter two. Moreover, the produced phylogeny strongly supported the monophyly of the “semifumatus” group, and molecular clock analyses dated its divergence from Cephalomalthinus to 32.52 Ma. Thus, the new genus Amphimorphus gen. nov. is suggested to comprise the “semifumatus” group, in which the observed gene rearrangement was a synapomorphy. Moreover, morphological evidence regarding the unique structure of the aedeagus supported this separation. These results indicate that mitochondrial gene rearrangement provide important phylogenetic implications for revising Cephalomalthinus, a speciose genus that is puzzling in the morphology‐based taxonomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoologica Scripta\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"86 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoologica Scripta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12572\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoologica Scripta","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12572","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Cephalomalthinus semifumatus物种群,此后被称为“semifumatatus”群,之所以有趣,是因为其异质形态类似于Cephalomalthinus Pic,1921或Rhagonycha Eschscholtz,1830。为了阐明其系统发育状况,对“半fumatus”组的4个物种、11个Cephalomalthinus物种和11个Rhagonycha物种的线粒体基因组进行了测序和检查。所有分析的有丝分裂基因组在基因组大小、核苷酸组成和AT含量方面都是相似的。令人惊讶的是,在“半fumatus”组中检测到trnW‐trnC和trnY基因的重排,可能是由串联重复和随机丢失事件引起的。此外,遗传距离分析表明,“半fumatus”群体与Cephalomalthinus和Rhagonycha的接近程度与后两者相当。此外,所产生的系统发育学有力地支持了“半fumatus”类群的单系性,分子钟分析表明其与Cephalomalthinus的差异为32.52 因此,新属Amphymorphus gen.nov.被认为包括“半富马图”组,其中观察到的基因重排是一种突触形态。此外,有关aedeagus独特结构的形态学证据支持了这种分离。这些结果表明,线粒体基因重排为修改Cephalomalthinus提供了重要的系统发育意义,Cephalomalthinus是一个在基于形态学的分类学中令人困惑的物种属。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mitochondrial gene rearrangements suggest a new genus in the subfamily Cantharinae (Coleoptera)
The Cephalomalthinus semifumatus species group, referred to as the “semifumatus” group henceforth, is interesting because of its heterogeneous morphology resembling either Cephalomalthinus Pic, 1921 or Rhagonycha Eschscholtz, 1830. To elucidate its phylogenetic status, mitochondrial genomes of four species of the “semifumatus” group, 11 Cephalomalthinus species, and 11 Rhagonycha species were sequenced and examined. All analysed mitogenomes were similar with respect to genome size, nucleotide composition, and AT content. Surprisingly, a rearrangement of the trnW‐trnC and trnY genes was detected in the “semifumatus” group, presumably caused by tandem duplication and random loss events. Furthermore, genetic distance analyses showed that the proximity of the “semifumatus” group to Cephalomalthinus and to Rhagonycha was comparable to that between the latter two. Moreover, the produced phylogeny strongly supported the monophyly of the “semifumatus” group, and molecular clock analyses dated its divergence from Cephalomalthinus to 32.52 Ma. Thus, the new genus Amphimorphus gen. nov. is suggested to comprise the “semifumatus” group, in which the observed gene rearrangement was a synapomorphy. Moreover, morphological evidence regarding the unique structure of the aedeagus supported this separation. These results indicate that mitochondrial gene rearrangement provide important phylogenetic implications for revising Cephalomalthinus, a speciose genus that is puzzling in the morphology‐based taxonomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zoologica Scripta
Zoologica Scripta 生物-动物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoologica Scripta publishes papers in animal systematics and phylogeny, i.e. studies of evolutionary relationships among taxa, and the origin and evolution of biological diversity. Papers can also deal with ecological interactions and geographic distributions (phylogeography) if the results are placed in a wider phylogenetic/systematic/evolutionary context. Zoologica Scripta encourages papers on the development of methods for all aspects of phylogenetic inference and biological nomenclature/classification. Articles published in Zoologica Scripta must be original and present either theoretical or empirical studies of interest to a broad audience in systematics and phylogeny. Purely taxonomic papers, like species descriptions without being placed in a wider systematic/phylogenetic context, will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信