理解弹性是如何在组织科学中测量的

IF 2.9 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Human Performance Pub Date : 2020-04-07 DOI:10.1080/08959285.2020.1744151

Shannon K. Cheng, Danielle D. King, F. Oswald

{"title":"理解弹性是如何在组织科学中测量的","authors":"Shannon K. Cheng, Danielle D. King, F. Oswald","doi":"10.1080/08959285.2020.1744151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Resilience is a topic of growing interest in the workplace; however, regarding its definition and measurement, a wide range of perspectives and idiosyncrasies persist. We take a closer look at the state of resilience through item-level analyses of 14 publicly available measures. In Study 1, relevance ratings revealed that many items from the measures were not aligned with subject matter experts’ (SMEs) conceptualizations of resilience. In Study 2, SMEs were able to sort the relevant items reliably into eight categories. In Study 3, four factors summarized participant responses to these items, and these factors aligned with the categories from Study 2. Moreover, resilience scales based on these four factors demonstrated expected patterns of convergent and discriminant validity. Implications for resilience theory and measurement are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47825,"journal":{"name":"Human Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08959285.2020.1744151","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding How Resilience is Measured in the Organizational Sciences\",\"authors\":\"Shannon K. Cheng, Danielle D. King, F. Oswald\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959285.2020.1744151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Resilience is a topic of growing interest in the workplace; however, regarding its definition and measurement, a wide range of perspectives and idiosyncrasies persist. We take a closer look at the state of resilience through item-level analyses of 14 publicly available measures. In Study 1, relevance ratings revealed that many items from the measures were not aligned with subject matter experts’ (SMEs) conceptualizations of resilience. In Study 2, SMEs were able to sort the relevant items reliably into eight categories. In Study 3, four factors summarized participant responses to these items, and these factors aligned with the categories from Study 2. Moreover, resilience scales based on these four factors demonstrated expected patterns of convergent and discriminant validity. Implications for resilience theory and measurement are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Performance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08959285.2020.1744151\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2020.1744151\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2020.1744151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 17

摘要

弹性是一个越来越受关注的职场话题;然而，关于它的定义和测量，广泛的观点和特质仍然存在。我们通过对14项公开可用措施的项目级分析来仔细研究弹性状态。在研究1中，相关性评级显示，许多项目的措施不符合主题专家(中小企业)的弹性概念。在研究2中，中小企业能够可靠地将相关项目分为八类。在研究3中，四个因素总结了参与者对这些项目的反应，这些因素与研究2中的类别一致。此外，基于这四个因素的弹性量表显示出收敛效度和区别效度的预期模式。讨论了弹性理论和测量的意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Understanding How Resilience is Measured in the Organizational Sciences

ABSTRACT Resilience is a topic of growing interest in the workplace; however, regarding its definition and measurement, a wide range of perspectives and idiosyncrasies persist. We take a closer look at the state of resilience through item-level analyses of 14 publicly available measures. In Study 1, relevance ratings revealed that many items from the measures were not aligned with subject matter experts’ (SMEs) conceptualizations of resilience. In Study 2, SMEs were able to sort the relevant items reliably into eight categories. In Study 3, four factors summarized participant responses to these items, and these factors aligned with the categories from Study 2. Moreover, resilience scales based on these four factors demonstrated expected patterns of convergent and discriminant validity. Implications for resilience theory and measurement are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Human Performance PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Human Performance publishes research investigating the nature and role of performance in the workplace and in organizational settings and offers a rich variety of information going beyond the study of traditional job behavior. Dedicated to presenting original research, theory, and measurement methods, the journal investigates individual, team, and firm level performance factors that influence work and organizational effectiveness. Human Performance is a respected forum for behavioral scientists interested in variables that motivate and promote high-level human performance, particularly in organizational and occupational settings. The journal seeks to identify and stimulate relevant research, communication, and theory concerning human capabilities and effectiveness. It serves as a valuable intellectual link between such disciplines as industrial-organizational psychology, individual differences, work physiology, organizational behavior, human resource management, and human factors.