R. Reily, T. Simpson, M. Evans, Alison Smith, J. Duchesne
{"title":"无来源的不稳定:低血压钝性创伤患者的非诊断性三联征","authors":"R. Reily, T. Simpson, M. Evans, Alison Smith, J. Duchesne","doi":"10.26676/jevtm.v3i1.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Current algorithms for resuscitation in blunt trauma patients rely on chest x-ray, FAST, and pelvic x-ray to quickly elicit a source of major bleeding in the trauma bay. There are currently no good recommendations for the patient in whom all three of these imaging studies are negative. \nMethods: We identified blunt trauma victims who presented with a systolic blood pressure below 100mmHg. Chest x-ray, FAST, and pelvic x-ray obtained in the trauma bay were reviewed, and patients who had all three studies negative underwent thorough chart review and characterization of injuries. \nResults: Of the total hypotensive blunt trauma victims (n=649), we found 47 who had a “non-diagnostic triad” (NDT). Of the NDT group, 31.9% (n=15) were found to have a major injury contributing to hypotension, while 61% (n=29) were not diagnosed with a severe injury that could have contributed to hypotension. Of the NDT group with severe injury, 40% (n=6) were found to have retroperitoneal bleeding, 40% (n=6) were found to have intraperitoneal bleeding despite negative fast, 13% (n=2) were thought to have spinal shock, and one patient had a blunt cardiac injury. \nConclusions: Most of the NDT group patients in this study were not diagnosed with a serious injury. However, a significant minority (31%) were found to have a major injury contributing to hypotension. Of these patients, retroperitoneal and/or intra-abdominal bleeding were found in 80%, with neurogenic and cardiogenic shock less common. We feel these sicker NDT patients may benefit from REBOA, although more study is warranted before formal algorithms and recommendations are made. ","PeriodicalId":41233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unstable Without a Source: The Non-Diagnostic Triad in Hypotensive Blunt Trauma Victims\",\"authors\":\"R. Reily, T. Simpson, M. Evans, Alison Smith, J. Duchesne\",\"doi\":\"10.26676/jevtm.v3i1.83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Current algorithms for resuscitation in blunt trauma patients rely on chest x-ray, FAST, and pelvic x-ray to quickly elicit a source of major bleeding in the trauma bay. There are currently no good recommendations for the patient in whom all three of these imaging studies are negative. \\nMethods: We identified blunt trauma victims who presented with a systolic blood pressure below 100mmHg. Chest x-ray, FAST, and pelvic x-ray obtained in the trauma bay were reviewed, and patients who had all three studies negative underwent thorough chart review and characterization of injuries. \\nResults: Of the total hypotensive blunt trauma victims (n=649), we found 47 who had a “non-diagnostic triad” (NDT). Of the NDT group, 31.9% (n=15) were found to have a major injury contributing to hypotension, while 61% (n=29) were not diagnosed with a severe injury that could have contributed to hypotension. Of the NDT group with severe injury, 40% (n=6) were found to have retroperitoneal bleeding, 40% (n=6) were found to have intraperitoneal bleeding despite negative fast, 13% (n=2) were thought to have spinal shock, and one patient had a blunt cardiac injury. \\nConclusions: Most of the NDT group patients in this study were not diagnosed with a serious injury. However, a significant minority (31%) were found to have a major injury contributing to hypotension. Of these patients, retroperitoneal and/or intra-abdominal bleeding were found in 80%, with neurogenic and cardiogenic shock less common. We feel these sicker NDT patients may benefit from REBOA, although more study is warranted before formal algorithms and recommendations are made. \",\"PeriodicalId\":41233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.v3i1.83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.v3i1.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unstable Without a Source: The Non-Diagnostic Triad in Hypotensive Blunt Trauma Victims
Background: Current algorithms for resuscitation in blunt trauma patients rely on chest x-ray, FAST, and pelvic x-ray to quickly elicit a source of major bleeding in the trauma bay. There are currently no good recommendations for the patient in whom all three of these imaging studies are negative.
Methods: We identified blunt trauma victims who presented with a systolic blood pressure below 100mmHg. Chest x-ray, FAST, and pelvic x-ray obtained in the trauma bay were reviewed, and patients who had all three studies negative underwent thorough chart review and characterization of injuries.
Results: Of the total hypotensive blunt trauma victims (n=649), we found 47 who had a “non-diagnostic triad” (NDT). Of the NDT group, 31.9% (n=15) were found to have a major injury contributing to hypotension, while 61% (n=29) were not diagnosed with a severe injury that could have contributed to hypotension. Of the NDT group with severe injury, 40% (n=6) were found to have retroperitoneal bleeding, 40% (n=6) were found to have intraperitoneal bleeding despite negative fast, 13% (n=2) were thought to have spinal shock, and one patient had a blunt cardiac injury.
Conclusions: Most of the NDT group patients in this study were not diagnosed with a serious injury. However, a significant minority (31%) were found to have a major injury contributing to hypotension. Of these patients, retroperitoneal and/or intra-abdominal bleeding were found in 80%, with neurogenic and cardiogenic shock less common. We feel these sicker NDT patients may benefit from REBOA, although more study is warranted before formal algorithms and recommendations are made.