在jo奥佩索阿工作的专业人士对可持续城市排水的看法

Revista DAE Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI:10.36659/dae.2023.032
Maria Cecília Paiva Nóbrega, Adriano Rolim da Paz, Luciana Andrade dos Passos, Giulliane Cahino Ferreira
{"title":"在jo<s:1>奥佩索阿工作的专业人士对可持续城市排水的看法","authors":"Maria Cecília Paiva Nóbrega, Adriano Rolim da Paz, Luciana Andrade dos Passos, Giulliane Cahino Ferreira","doi":"10.36659/dae.2023.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Brazil, the adoption of sustainable urban drainage (SUD) measures is modest, and the conventional approach prevails. This research evaluates the perception of 377 professionals (civil engineers, environmental engineers and architects) that work in João Pessoa and surroundings regarding their knowledge on SUD, their preferences and barriers for adopting SUD. Most of them demonstrate limited knowledge on the subject, with difficulty distinguishing between conventional and sustainable measures. But the vast majority of professionals were willing to adopt SUD facilities in their projects, preferably infiltration trenches, permeable pavements and green roofs. The maintenance of the devices and the hirer/user acceptance were key aspects for this choice, while superiors’ disinterest, the unfamiliarity of entrepreneurs and financiers, and lack of governmental support were the primary barriers. There is a need to improve the academic education of these professionals and provide basic understanding of SUD principles for several other actors. \nKeywords: Stormwater. Green infrastructure. Low impact development. Source-control.","PeriodicalId":33186,"journal":{"name":"Revista DAE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception of professionals working in João Pessoa and surroundings regarding sustainable urban drainage\",\"authors\":\"Maria Cecília Paiva Nóbrega, Adriano Rolim da Paz, Luciana Andrade dos Passos, Giulliane Cahino Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.36659/dae.2023.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Brazil, the adoption of sustainable urban drainage (SUD) measures is modest, and the conventional approach prevails. This research evaluates the perception of 377 professionals (civil engineers, environmental engineers and architects) that work in João Pessoa and surroundings regarding their knowledge on SUD, their preferences and barriers for adopting SUD. Most of them demonstrate limited knowledge on the subject, with difficulty distinguishing between conventional and sustainable measures. But the vast majority of professionals were willing to adopt SUD facilities in their projects, preferably infiltration trenches, permeable pavements and green roofs. The maintenance of the devices and the hirer/user acceptance were key aspects for this choice, while superiors’ disinterest, the unfamiliarity of entrepreneurs and financiers, and lack of governmental support were the primary barriers. There is a need to improve the academic education of these professionals and provide basic understanding of SUD principles for several other actors. \\nKeywords: Stormwater. Green infrastructure. Low impact development. Source-control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista DAE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista DAE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36659/dae.2023.032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista DAE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36659/dae.2023.032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在巴西,可持续城市排水(SUD)措施的采用是适度的,传统的方法盛行。本研究评估了在jo o Pessoa及周边地区工作的377名专业人士(土木工程师、环境工程师和建筑师)对SUD的了解、偏好和采用SUD的障碍。他们大多数对这一问题的了解有限,难以区分常规措施和可持续措施。但绝大多数专业人士都愿意在他们的项目中采用SUD的设施,最好是渗透壕、透水路面和绿化屋顶。设备的维护和雇佣者/使用者的接受度是这一选择的关键因素,而上级的不感兴趣、企业家和金融家的不熟悉以及缺乏政府支持是主要障碍。有必要改善这些专业人员的学术教育,并为其他一些参与者提供对SUD原则的基本理解。关键词:雨水。绿色基础设施。低影响发展。源代码控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perception of professionals working in João Pessoa and surroundings regarding sustainable urban drainage
In Brazil, the adoption of sustainable urban drainage (SUD) measures is modest, and the conventional approach prevails. This research evaluates the perception of 377 professionals (civil engineers, environmental engineers and architects) that work in João Pessoa and surroundings regarding their knowledge on SUD, their preferences and barriers for adopting SUD. Most of them demonstrate limited knowledge on the subject, with difficulty distinguishing between conventional and sustainable measures. But the vast majority of professionals were willing to adopt SUD facilities in their projects, preferably infiltration trenches, permeable pavements and green roofs. The maintenance of the devices and the hirer/user acceptance were key aspects for this choice, while superiors’ disinterest, the unfamiliarity of entrepreneurs and financiers, and lack of governmental support were the primary barriers. There is a need to improve the academic education of these professionals and provide basic understanding of SUD principles for several other actors. Keywords: Stormwater. Green infrastructure. Low impact development. Source-control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信