使用治疗师报告描述基于测量的护理实施

Elizabeth Casline, Grace Woodard, Zabin S Patel, Dominique A Phillips, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Golda S Ginsburg, Amanda Jensen-Doss
{"title":"使用治疗师报告描述基于测量的护理实施","authors":"Elizabeth Casline, Grace Woodard, Zabin S Patel, Dominique A Phillips, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Golda S Ginsburg, Amanda Jensen-Doss","doi":"10.1080/23794925.2022.2124555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effectiveness of measurement-based care (MBC), an evidence-based practice that uses regularly collected assessment data to guide clinical decision-making, is impacted by whether and how therapists use information from MBC tools in treatment. Improved characterization of how therapists use MBC in treatment sessions with youth is needed to guide implementation and understand variability in MBC effectiveness. To meet this need, this study examined therapists' sharing and discussion of MBC in treatment sessions. Thirty therapists were randomly assigned to the MBC condition as part of a comparative effectiveness trail of treatments for adolescent anxiety and depression. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on therapists' written explanations of changes made to the session based on the MBC data. Therapists reported sharing data with youth and caregivers in an average of 34.6% and 27.4% of sessions, respectively. Therapists reported incorporating MBC data in an average of 21.1% of sessions. When data were used, therapists predominately focused changes on short-term (e.g., current symptoms, treatment skill) rather than long-term (e.g., symptom progress, treatment goals) decision-making. Therapists inconsistently used MBC data, highlighting the need for improved training in and monitoring of how therapists use MBC in session to guide collaborative treatment decision-making with youth and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":72992,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","volume":" ","pages":"549-559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing measurement-based care implementation using therapist report.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Casline, Grace Woodard, Zabin S Patel, Dominique A Phillips, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Golda S Ginsburg, Amanda Jensen-Doss\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23794925.2022.2124555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effectiveness of measurement-based care (MBC), an evidence-based practice that uses regularly collected assessment data to guide clinical decision-making, is impacted by whether and how therapists use information from MBC tools in treatment. Improved characterization of how therapists use MBC in treatment sessions with youth is needed to guide implementation and understand variability in MBC effectiveness. To meet this need, this study examined therapists' sharing and discussion of MBC in treatment sessions. Thirty therapists were randomly assigned to the MBC condition as part of a comparative effectiveness trail of treatments for adolescent anxiety and depression. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on therapists' written explanations of changes made to the session based on the MBC data. Therapists reported sharing data with youth and caregivers in an average of 34.6% and 27.4% of sessions, respectively. Therapists reported incorporating MBC data in an average of 21.1% of sessions. When data were used, therapists predominately focused changes on short-term (e.g., current symptoms, treatment skill) rather than long-term (e.g., symptom progress, treatment goals) decision-making. Therapists inconsistently used MBC data, highlighting the need for improved training in and monitoring of how therapists use MBC in session to guide collaborative treatment decision-making with youth and caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"549-559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683951/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2022.2124555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2022.2124555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于测量的护理(MBC)是一种基于证据的实践,使用定期收集的评估数据来指导临床决策,其有效性受到治疗师是否以及如何在治疗中使用来自MBC工具的信息的影响。需要改进治疗师在青少年治疗过程中如何使用MBC的特征,以指导实施并了解MBC有效性的可变性。为了满足这一需求,本研究调查了治疗师在治疗过程中对MBC的分享和讨论。30名治疗师被随机分配到MBC条件下,作为青少年焦虑和抑郁治疗比较有效性的一部分。根据MBC数据,对治疗师对会议变化的书面解释进行定性内容分析。治疗师报告与青少年和护理人员分享数据的平均比例分别为34.6%和27.4%。治疗师报告称,平均21.1%的疗程纳入了MBC数据。当使用数据时,治疗师主要关注短期(例如,当前症状,治疗技能)而不是长期(例如,症状进展,治疗目标)决策的变化。治疗师不一致地使用MBC数据,强调需要改进培训和监测治疗师如何在会议中使用MBC来指导青少年和照顾者的协作治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing measurement-based care implementation using therapist report.

The effectiveness of measurement-based care (MBC), an evidence-based practice that uses regularly collected assessment data to guide clinical decision-making, is impacted by whether and how therapists use information from MBC tools in treatment. Improved characterization of how therapists use MBC in treatment sessions with youth is needed to guide implementation and understand variability in MBC effectiveness. To meet this need, this study examined therapists' sharing and discussion of MBC in treatment sessions. Thirty therapists were randomly assigned to the MBC condition as part of a comparative effectiveness trail of treatments for adolescent anxiety and depression. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on therapists' written explanations of changes made to the session based on the MBC data. Therapists reported sharing data with youth and caregivers in an average of 34.6% and 27.4% of sessions, respectively. Therapists reported incorporating MBC data in an average of 21.1% of sessions. When data were used, therapists predominately focused changes on short-term (e.g., current symptoms, treatment skill) rather than long-term (e.g., symptom progress, treatment goals) decision-making. Therapists inconsistently used MBC data, highlighting the need for improved training in and monitoring of how therapists use MBC in session to guide collaborative treatment decision-making with youth and caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信