福克纳、布鲁克斯与新批评理论的活读者

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Yael Segalovitz
{"title":"福克纳、布鲁克斯与新批评理论的活读者","authors":"Yael Segalovitz","doi":"10.1353/ARQ.2019.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article challenges the assumption that close reading is an apolitical and ahistorical practice by reading Cleanth Brooks’ The Well Wrought Urn alongside his seminal work on William Faulkner. These texts expose the crucial role “attention” plays in the formation of close reading, and demonstrate that at the heart of American New Criticism there lies a notion of reading that assumes a unique capacity for animating otherness. Brooks labors to cultivate in his reader an attentiveness so profound as to lead to self-deadening. However, this self-erasure is not a solely negative process in his mind, since it allows the reader an intimate encounter with the literary text as alterity. This New Critical model of reading unexpectedly corresponds to Jacques Derrida’s hauntological ethics. By bringing into dialogue Brooks, Faulkner, and Derrida, this essay offers a new view of the values that underlie close reading as a contemporary method of literary interpretation.","PeriodicalId":42394,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly","volume":"75 1","pages":"49 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ARQ.2019.0002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"William Faulkner, Cleanth Brooks, and the Living-Dead Reader of New Critical Theory\",\"authors\":\"Yael Segalovitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ARQ.2019.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article challenges the assumption that close reading is an apolitical and ahistorical practice by reading Cleanth Brooks’ The Well Wrought Urn alongside his seminal work on William Faulkner. These texts expose the crucial role “attention” plays in the formation of close reading, and demonstrate that at the heart of American New Criticism there lies a notion of reading that assumes a unique capacity for animating otherness. Brooks labors to cultivate in his reader an attentiveness so profound as to lead to self-deadening. However, this self-erasure is not a solely negative process in his mind, since it allows the reader an intimate encounter with the literary text as alterity. This New Critical model of reading unexpectedly corresponds to Jacques Derrida’s hauntological ethics. By bringing into dialogue Brooks, Faulkner, and Derrida, this essay offers a new view of the values that underlie close reading as a contemporary method of literary interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"49 - 83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ARQ.2019.0002\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ARQ.2019.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ARQ.2019.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:本文通过阅读克林斯·布鲁克斯的《精心制作的瓮》以及他对威廉·福克纳的开创性著作,挑战了细读是一种非政治和非历史实践的假设。这些文本揭示了“注意力”在形成细读中所起的关键作用,并证明了在美国新批评主义的核心,存在着一种阅读观念,这种观念假定了一种独特的激活他者的能力。布鲁克斯努力在他的读者中培养一种如此深刻的注意力,以至于导致自我麻木。然而,在他看来,这种自我抹去并不仅仅是一个消极的过程,因为它允许读者与文学文本亲密接触,作为另一种选择。这种新批判的阅读模式出乎意料地与雅克·德里达的幽灵伦理学相吻合。通过对布鲁克斯、福克纳和德里达的对话,本文提供了一种新的价值观,这种价值观是当代文学解读方法的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
William Faulkner, Cleanth Brooks, and the Living-Dead Reader of New Critical Theory
Abstract:This article challenges the assumption that close reading is an apolitical and ahistorical practice by reading Cleanth Brooks’ The Well Wrought Urn alongside his seminal work on William Faulkner. These texts expose the crucial role “attention” plays in the formation of close reading, and demonstrate that at the heart of American New Criticism there lies a notion of reading that assumes a unique capacity for animating otherness. Brooks labors to cultivate in his reader an attentiveness so profound as to lead to self-deadening. However, this self-erasure is not a solely negative process in his mind, since it allows the reader an intimate encounter with the literary text as alterity. This New Critical model of reading unexpectedly corresponds to Jacques Derrida’s hauntological ethics. By bringing into dialogue Brooks, Faulkner, and Derrida, this essay offers a new view of the values that underlie close reading as a contemporary method of literary interpretation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arizona Quarterly
Arizona Quarterly LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Arizona Quarterly publishes scholarly essays on American literature, culture, and theory. It is our mission to subject these categories to debate, argument, interpretation, and contestation via critical readings of primary texts. We accept essays that are grounded in textual, formal, cultural, and theoretical examination of texts and situated with respect to current academic conversations whilst extending the boundaries thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信