G. Njung, Marcia C. Schenck, Jochen Lingelbach, Lazlo Passemiers, Magnus Treiber, Rose Jaji, Gerawork Teferra, Muna Omar, Y. Gez, L. Kroeker, Imomotimi Armstrong, Bruce Cadle, Yusuf Sholeye, Felipe Antonio Honorato, Silas Fiorotti
{"title":"反思避难:非洲寻求避难的过程;引言","authors":"G. Njung, Marcia C. Schenck, Jochen Lingelbach, Lazlo Passemiers, Magnus Treiber, Rose Jaji, Gerawork Teferra, Muna Omar, Y. Gez, L. Kroeker, Imomotimi Armstrong, Bruce Cadle, Yusuf Sholeye, Felipe Antonio Honorato, Silas Fiorotti","doi":"10.2979/africatoday.69.1_2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Examining the case of some nineteen thousand Polish refugees in British colonial Africa, this article challenges the Eurocentric historiography of the post–World War II international refugee regime. These Poles, after being hosted by the colonial governments first, eventually came under the mandate of emerging UN refugee organizations that treated Europeans as internationally recognized refugees everywhere in the world. In contrast, fleeing Africans (and Asians) did not fit this category. This distinction had more to do with imperialism and race than with any geographic limitation. Conceptually, the refugee regime rests on the differentiation of refugees and national citizens, while imperial rule differentiated between European citizens and colonized subjects. I want to complicate this by emphasizing that the international refugee regime emerged in a largely imperial world signified by a tripartition into citizen, subject, and European refugee.","PeriodicalId":39703,"journal":{"name":"Africa Today","volume":"69 1","pages":"1 - 109 - 110 - 13 - 133 - 134 - 14 - 161 - 162 - 189 - 190 - 213 - 214 - 237 - 238 - 254 - 255 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking Refuge: Processes of Refuge Seeking in Africa; An Introduction\",\"authors\":\"G. Njung, Marcia C. Schenck, Jochen Lingelbach, Lazlo Passemiers, Magnus Treiber, Rose Jaji, Gerawork Teferra, Muna Omar, Y. Gez, L. Kroeker, Imomotimi Armstrong, Bruce Cadle, Yusuf Sholeye, Felipe Antonio Honorato, Silas Fiorotti\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/africatoday.69.1_2.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Examining the case of some nineteen thousand Polish refugees in British colonial Africa, this article challenges the Eurocentric historiography of the post–World War II international refugee regime. These Poles, after being hosted by the colonial governments first, eventually came under the mandate of emerging UN refugee organizations that treated Europeans as internationally recognized refugees everywhere in the world. In contrast, fleeing Africans (and Asians) did not fit this category. This distinction had more to do with imperialism and race than with any geographic limitation. Conceptually, the refugee regime rests on the differentiation of refugees and national citizens, while imperial rule differentiated between European citizens and colonized subjects. I want to complicate this by emphasizing that the international refugee regime emerged in a largely imperial world signified by a tripartition into citizen, subject, and European refugee.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa Today\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 109 - 110 - 13 - 133 - 134 - 14 - 161 - 162 - 189 - 190 - 213 - 214 - 237 - 238 - 254 - 255 - 26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/africatoday.69.1_2.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/africatoday.69.1_2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rethinking Refuge: Processes of Refuge Seeking in Africa; An Introduction
Abstract:Examining the case of some nineteen thousand Polish refugees in British colonial Africa, this article challenges the Eurocentric historiography of the post–World War II international refugee regime. These Poles, after being hosted by the colonial governments first, eventually came under the mandate of emerging UN refugee organizations that treated Europeans as internationally recognized refugees everywhere in the world. In contrast, fleeing Africans (and Asians) did not fit this category. This distinction had more to do with imperialism and race than with any geographic limitation. Conceptually, the refugee regime rests on the differentiation of refugees and national citizens, while imperial rule differentiated between European citizens and colonized subjects. I want to complicate this by emphasizing that the international refugee regime emerged in a largely imperial world signified by a tripartition into citizen, subject, and European refugee.
Africa TodaySocial Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
Africa Today, a leading journal for more than 50 years, has been in the forefront of publishing Africanist reform-minded research, and provides access to the best scholarly work from around the world on a full range of political, economic, and social issues. Active electronic and combined electronic/print subscriptions to this journal include access to the online backrun.