带预旋定子的螺旋桨设计

A. Koval, A. Maslova, N. Marinich
{"title":"带预旋定子的螺旋桨设计","authors":"A. Koval, A. Maslova, N. Marinich","doi":"10.24937/2542-2324-2022-1-399-95-101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Object and purpose of research. This research was intended to check if a pre-swirl stator installed before an open propeller of moderate skew could be a viable solution for non-cavitation hydrodynamic noise mitigation. This solution was compared with a typical open skewed silent propeller. Materials and methods. Design and verification calculations have been performed in a given wake field of pre-swirl stator. Pre-swirl stator was designed considering the wake field turn at the skew angles of typical propeller. Wake field behind the pre-swirl stator and design calculation of open propeller considering the heterogeneity of inflow were determined using the calculation methods. The tests and calculations of vibroacoustic parameters have been performed for evaluation of propulsion, cavitation and acoustic parameters of propellers with pre-swirl stators in comparison with open propeller. Main results. This work was also intended to answer the question if a moderate-skew propeller with pre-swirl stator could be an alternative to a silent skewed open propeller. To this effect, a model of propulsion system (propeller + pre-swirl stator) was designed and manufactured. This model was further used for comparative cavitation, hydrodynamic and acoustic testing in the cavitation tunnel, as well as for self-propulsion tests in deep-water towing tank. Conclusion. The tests have shown that propellers with pre-swirl stators have lower noise emission at high frequencies than open propellers. Cavitation and propulsion performance remain the same for both options.","PeriodicalId":33210,"journal":{"name":"Trudy Krylovskogo gosudarstvennogo nauchnogo tsentra","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Propeller design with pre-swirl stators\",\"authors\":\"A. Koval, A. Maslova, N. Marinich\",\"doi\":\"10.24937/2542-2324-2022-1-399-95-101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Object and purpose of research. This research was intended to check if a pre-swirl stator installed before an open propeller of moderate skew could be a viable solution for non-cavitation hydrodynamic noise mitigation. This solution was compared with a typical open skewed silent propeller. Materials and methods. Design and verification calculations have been performed in a given wake field of pre-swirl stator. Pre-swirl stator was designed considering the wake field turn at the skew angles of typical propeller. Wake field behind the pre-swirl stator and design calculation of open propeller considering the heterogeneity of inflow were determined using the calculation methods. The tests and calculations of vibroacoustic parameters have been performed for evaluation of propulsion, cavitation and acoustic parameters of propellers with pre-swirl stators in comparison with open propeller. Main results. This work was also intended to answer the question if a moderate-skew propeller with pre-swirl stator could be an alternative to a silent skewed open propeller. To this effect, a model of propulsion system (propeller + pre-swirl stator) was designed and manufactured. This model was further used for comparative cavitation, hydrodynamic and acoustic testing in the cavitation tunnel, as well as for self-propulsion tests in deep-water towing tank. Conclusion. The tests have shown that propellers with pre-swirl stators have lower noise emission at high frequencies than open propellers. Cavitation and propulsion performance remain the same for both options.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trudy Krylovskogo gosudarstvennogo nauchnogo tsentra\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trudy Krylovskogo gosudarstvennogo nauchnogo tsentra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24937/2542-2324-2022-1-399-95-101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trudy Krylovskogo gosudarstvennogo nauchnogo tsentra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24937/2542-2324-2022-1-399-95-101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究对象和目的。这项研究旨在检查安装在中等偏斜的开放式螺旋桨之前的预旋定子是否是非空化流体动力学噪声缓解的可行解决方案。将该解决方案与典型的开口倾斜静音螺旋桨进行了比较。材料和方法。在给定的预旋定子尾流场中进行了设计和验证计算。在设计预旋定子时,考虑了典型螺旋桨的尾流场转角。采用计算方法确定了预旋定子后的尾流场和考虑进水非均匀性的开放式螺旋桨的设计计算。通过振动声学参数的测试和计算,与开放式螺旋桨相比,对带有预旋定子的螺旋桨的推进、空化和声学参数进行了评估。主要结果。这项工作还旨在回答一个问题,即带预旋定子的中等偏斜螺旋桨是否可以替代无声偏斜开放式螺旋桨。为此,设计并制造了一个推进系统模型(螺旋桨+预旋定子)。该模型被进一步用于空化隧道中的比较空化、流体动力学和声学测试,以及深水拖曳池中的自推进测试。结论试验表明,带有预旋定子的螺旋桨在高频下的噪声排放比开放式螺旋桨低。两种方案的空化和推进性能保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Propeller design with pre-swirl stators
Object and purpose of research. This research was intended to check if a pre-swirl stator installed before an open propeller of moderate skew could be a viable solution for non-cavitation hydrodynamic noise mitigation. This solution was compared with a typical open skewed silent propeller. Materials and methods. Design and verification calculations have been performed in a given wake field of pre-swirl stator. Pre-swirl stator was designed considering the wake field turn at the skew angles of typical propeller. Wake field behind the pre-swirl stator and design calculation of open propeller considering the heterogeneity of inflow were determined using the calculation methods. The tests and calculations of vibroacoustic parameters have been performed for evaluation of propulsion, cavitation and acoustic parameters of propellers with pre-swirl stators in comparison with open propeller. Main results. This work was also intended to answer the question if a moderate-skew propeller with pre-swirl stator could be an alternative to a silent skewed open propeller. To this effect, a model of propulsion system (propeller + pre-swirl stator) was designed and manufactured. This model was further used for comparative cavitation, hydrodynamic and acoustic testing in the cavitation tunnel, as well as for self-propulsion tests in deep-water towing tank. Conclusion. The tests have shown that propellers with pre-swirl stators have lower noise emission at high frequencies than open propellers. Cavitation and propulsion performance remain the same for both options.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信