在门诊进行大隐静脉血管内治疗(浅支静脉立即泡沫硬化治疗)真的安全且有利可图吗?

IF 0.4 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
C. Orsini
{"title":"在门诊进行大隐静脉血管内治疗(浅支静脉立即泡沫硬化治疗)真的安全且有利可图吗?","authors":"C. Orsini","doi":"10.23736/s1593-232x.21.00498-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the safety of radiofrequency (RF) thermoablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) with immediate foam sclerotherapy of superficial tributary veins performed in the outpatient clinic (Hospital Department). Further, we also evaluated the cost reduction compared to the same procedure performed in the operating room. METHODS: Thirty patients were evaluated for RF thermoablation of the GSV. Foam sclerotherapy was performed with 1-3%sodium-tetra-decyl-sulphatefoam (Tessari’s method). We evaluated the possible risks of the procedure and methods to resolve them. We compared the costs of both procedures performed in the operating room and in the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: We had complete occlusion of the GSV in 28/30 patients (93.3%). Periodic check-up revealed a reflux through an anterior lateral saphenous vein in one patient and a long saphenous stump in another patient. There were no severe intraoperative complications. In two cases, it was necessary to convert the radiofrequency procedure into foam sclerotherapy (using the hollow probe as a long catheter in one case and using needle injection in the second case). In another case, it was necessary to perform surgical cannulation of the GSV. There were no severe postoperative complications. Moreover, the cost of the operating room procedure was € 1226.50, while that of the outpatient clinic procedure was € 1082.65 (cost reduction, 12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This procedure is safe and sufficiently cost-effective to perform in an outpatient clinic and the operating room can hence be reserved for patients with more serious pathologies. These results should be validated in further studies with larger sample size.","PeriodicalId":41673,"journal":{"name":"Acta Phlebologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is endovascular treatment of the great saphenous vein (with immediate foam sclerotherapy of superficial tributary veins) in an outpatient clinic really safe and profitable?\",\"authors\":\"C. Orsini\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/s1593-232x.21.00498-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the safety of radiofrequency (RF) thermoablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) with immediate foam sclerotherapy of superficial tributary veins performed in the outpatient clinic (Hospital Department). Further, we also evaluated the cost reduction compared to the same procedure performed in the operating room. METHODS: Thirty patients were evaluated for RF thermoablation of the GSV. Foam sclerotherapy was performed with 1-3%sodium-tetra-decyl-sulphatefoam (Tessari’s method). We evaluated the possible risks of the procedure and methods to resolve them. We compared the costs of both procedures performed in the operating room and in the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: We had complete occlusion of the GSV in 28/30 patients (93.3%). Periodic check-up revealed a reflux through an anterior lateral saphenous vein in one patient and a long saphenous stump in another patient. There were no severe intraoperative complications. In two cases, it was necessary to convert the radiofrequency procedure into foam sclerotherapy (using the hollow probe as a long catheter in one case and using needle injection in the second case). In another case, it was necessary to perform surgical cannulation of the GSV. There were no severe postoperative complications. Moreover, the cost of the operating room procedure was € 1226.50, while that of the outpatient clinic procedure was € 1082.65 (cost reduction, 12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This procedure is safe and sufficiently cost-effective to perform in an outpatient clinic and the operating room can hence be reserved for patients with more serious pathologies. These results should be validated in further studies with larger sample size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Phlebologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Phlebologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/s1593-232x.21.00498-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Phlebologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/s1593-232x.21.00498-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本初步研究旨在评估在门诊(医院部)进行大隐静脉射频(RF)热消融与浅支静脉即时泡沫硬化治疗的安全性。此外,我们还评估了与在手术室进行的相同手术相比的成本降低情况。方法:对30例GSV射频热消融患者进行评估。用1-3%的四癸基硫酸钠泡沫(Tessari方法)进行泡沫硬化治疗。我们评估了该程序可能存在的风险以及解决这些风险的方法。我们比较了在手术室和门诊进行的两种手术的费用。结果:30例患者中有28例(93.3%)的GSV完全闭塞。定期检查显示,一例患者的前外侧大隐静脉出现反流,另一例患者出现长隐残端。没有严重的术中并发症。在两种情况下,有必要将射频手术转化为泡沫硬化治疗(在一种情况下使用空心探针作为长导管,在第二种情况下则使用针头注射)。在另一种情况下,有必要进行GSV的外科插管。没有严重的术后并发症。此外,手术室手术费用为1226.50欧元,而门诊手术费用为1082.65欧元(成本降低12.5%)。这些结果应该在更大样本量的进一步研究中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is endovascular treatment of the great saphenous vein (with immediate foam sclerotherapy of superficial tributary veins) in an outpatient clinic really safe and profitable?
BACKGROUND: This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the safety of radiofrequency (RF) thermoablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) with immediate foam sclerotherapy of superficial tributary veins performed in the outpatient clinic (Hospital Department). Further, we also evaluated the cost reduction compared to the same procedure performed in the operating room. METHODS: Thirty patients were evaluated for RF thermoablation of the GSV. Foam sclerotherapy was performed with 1-3%sodium-tetra-decyl-sulphatefoam (Tessari’s method). We evaluated the possible risks of the procedure and methods to resolve them. We compared the costs of both procedures performed in the operating room and in the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: We had complete occlusion of the GSV in 28/30 patients (93.3%). Periodic check-up revealed a reflux through an anterior lateral saphenous vein in one patient and a long saphenous stump in another patient. There were no severe intraoperative complications. In two cases, it was necessary to convert the radiofrequency procedure into foam sclerotherapy (using the hollow probe as a long catheter in one case and using needle injection in the second case). In another case, it was necessary to perform surgical cannulation of the GSV. There were no severe postoperative complications. Moreover, the cost of the operating room procedure was € 1226.50, while that of the outpatient clinic procedure was € 1082.65 (cost reduction, 12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This procedure is safe and sufficiently cost-effective to perform in an outpatient clinic and the operating room can hence be reserved for patients with more serious pathologies. These results should be validated in further studies with larger sample size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Phlebologica
Acta Phlebologica PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信