体育教学方法工具的系统评价

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
F. M. Leo, Ana Flores-Cidoncha, Iván Ramírez-Bravo, M. A. López-Gajardo, J. Pulido
{"title":"体育教学方法工具的系统评价","authors":"F. M. Leo, Ana Flores-Cidoncha, Iván Ramírez-Bravo, M. A. López-Gajardo, J. Pulido","doi":"10.1080/1091367X.2023.2197887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Studies on teaching methodologies have been one of the most analyzed research topics in Physical Education (PE). Many instruments have been created to examine the teaching methodologies in PE. This systematic review aimed to identify the tools used in peer-reviewed journals (until March 2022) that assessed teaching methodologies in PE. Articles selected for analysis were found in Web of Science, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, SportDiscus, and ERIC databases. Potential studies were located using different combinations of keywords related to teaching methodologies. Quality was checked through five criteria on a quality assessment list. A total of 63 instruments were extracted from 58 articles that evaluated teaching methodologies. This systematic review outlines the currently available instruments and their characteristics (i.e. author(s), name, variables/dimensions, items/categories, response format, sample, and type of instrument) to assess teaching methodologies in PE. Future works could use this review to employ and/or improve the existing tools.","PeriodicalId":48577,"journal":{"name":"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science","volume":"27 1","pages":"377 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Methodology Instruments in Physical Education: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"F. M. Leo, Ana Flores-Cidoncha, Iván Ramírez-Bravo, M. A. López-Gajardo, J. Pulido\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1091367X.2023.2197887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Studies on teaching methodologies have been one of the most analyzed research topics in Physical Education (PE). Many instruments have been created to examine the teaching methodologies in PE. This systematic review aimed to identify the tools used in peer-reviewed journals (until March 2022) that assessed teaching methodologies in PE. Articles selected for analysis were found in Web of Science, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, SportDiscus, and ERIC databases. Potential studies were located using different combinations of keywords related to teaching methodologies. Quality was checked through five criteria on a quality assessment list. A total of 63 instruments were extracted from 58 articles that evaluated teaching methodologies. This systematic review outlines the currently available instruments and their characteristics (i.e. author(s), name, variables/dimensions, items/categories, response format, sample, and type of instrument) to assess teaching methodologies in PE. Future works could use this review to employ and/or improve the existing tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"377 - 390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2197887\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2197887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教学方法论研究一直是体育教育中分析最多的研究课题之一。已经创建了许多工具来检查体育教学方法。这项系统综述旨在确定同行评审期刊(至2022年3月)中使用的评估体育教学方法的工具。选择进行分析的文章可在Web of Science、SCOPUS、PsycINFO、SportDiscus和ERIC数据库中找到。使用与教学方法相关的关键词的不同组合来定位潜在的研究。通过质量评估清单上的五项标准对质量进行了检查。共从58篇评估教学方法的文章中提取了63项工具。本系统综述概述了目前可用的工具及其特征(即作者、名称、变量/维度、项目/类别、回复格式、样本和工具类型),以评估体育教学方法。未来的工作可以利用本综述来使用和/或改进现有工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching Methodology Instruments in Physical Education: A Systematic Review
ABSTRACT Studies on teaching methodologies have been one of the most analyzed research topics in Physical Education (PE). Many instruments have been created to examine the teaching methodologies in PE. This systematic review aimed to identify the tools used in peer-reviewed journals (until March 2022) that assessed teaching methodologies in PE. Articles selected for analysis were found in Web of Science, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, SportDiscus, and ERIC databases. Potential studies were located using different combinations of keywords related to teaching methodologies. Quality was checked through five criteria on a quality assessment list. A total of 63 instruments were extracted from 58 articles that evaluated teaching methodologies. This systematic review outlines the currently available instruments and their characteristics (i.e. author(s), name, variables/dimensions, items/categories, response format, sample, and type of instrument) to assess teaching methodologies in PE. Future works could use this review to employ and/or improve the existing tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The scope of Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science (MPEES) covers original measurement research, special issues, and tutorials within six substantive disciplines of physical education and exercise science. Six of the seven sections of MPEES define the substantive disciplines within the purview of the original research to be published in the journal: Exercise Science, Physical Activity, Physical Education Pedagogy, Psychology, Research Methodology and Statistics, and Sport Management and Administration. The seventh section of MPEES, Tutorial and Teacher’s Toolbox, serves to provide an outlet for review and/or didactic manuscripts to be published in the journal. Special issues provide an avenue for a coherent set of manuscripts (e.g., four to five) to collectively focus in-depth on an important and timely measurement-related issue within the scope of MPEES. The primary aim of MPEES is to publish high-impact manuscripts, most of which will focus on original research, that fit within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信