双胎妊娠中尝试分娩或计划剖腹产的母胎结果比较

Q4 Medicine
Oihane Vázquez-Maiz, Leire Maitane Ginto-Zabaleta, Maitane Zubikarai-Iturralde, Olaia Aristegui-Guridi, José Ángel Navarrina-Martínez, Arantxa Lekuona-Artola
{"title":"双胎妊娠中尝试分娩或计划剖腹产的母胎结果比较","authors":"Oihane Vázquez-Maiz, Leire Maitane Ginto-Zabaleta, Maitane Zubikarai-Iturralde, Olaia Aristegui-Guridi, José Ángel Navarrina-Martínez, Arantxa Lekuona-Artola","doi":"10.24245/gom.v88i11.4379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality between trial of labor and planned caesarean section in twin pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS : A retrospective cohort study in Donostia University Hospital during 2016 and 2017 including monochorial-biamniotic and bichorial biamniotic twin pregnancies >24+0 weeks of gestation. Gestations with antenatal death of one or both fetuses were excluded. Patients were classified into trial of labor group and planned cesarean section group. Primary outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Statistical analysis included χ 2 , Fisher´s exact test, Student´s T-test, Mann-Whitney U test and binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 248 twin births, 173 (69.8%) were included in the attempted delivery group and 75 (30.2%) in the scheduled cesarean section group. No difference was found in maternal morbidity and mortality (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.36-2.36). The attempted group had lower rates of admission to neonatal intensive care (first twin OR 0.27; 95% of the delivery vs CONCLUSIONS: Although second twins’ umbilical artery pH is lower in trial of labor group, neonatal morbidity is decreased. Therefore, trial of labor in selected cases is an adequate option that does not increase maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":12654,"journal":{"name":"Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Desenlaces maternofetales según la comparación entre intento de parto o cesárea programada en embarazos gemelares\",\"authors\":\"Oihane Vázquez-Maiz, Leire Maitane Ginto-Zabaleta, Maitane Zubikarai-Iturralde, Olaia Aristegui-Guridi, José Ángel Navarrina-Martínez, Arantxa Lekuona-Artola\",\"doi\":\"10.24245/gom.v88i11.4379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality between trial of labor and planned caesarean section in twin pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS : A retrospective cohort study in Donostia University Hospital during 2016 and 2017 including monochorial-biamniotic and bichorial biamniotic twin pregnancies >24+0 weeks of gestation. Gestations with antenatal death of one or both fetuses were excluded. Patients were classified into trial of labor group and planned cesarean section group. Primary outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Statistical analysis included χ 2 , Fisher´s exact test, Student´s T-test, Mann-Whitney U test and binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 248 twin births, 173 (69.8%) were included in the attempted delivery group and 75 (30.2%) in the scheduled cesarean section group. No difference was found in maternal morbidity and mortality (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.36-2.36). The attempted group had lower rates of admission to neonatal intensive care (first twin OR 0.27; 95% of the delivery vs CONCLUSIONS: Although second twins’ umbilical artery pH is lower in trial of labor group, neonatal morbidity is decreased. Therefore, trial of labor in selected cases is an adequate option that does not increase maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24245/gom.v88i11.4379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24245/gom.v88i11.4379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较试验分娩和计划剖宫产在双胎妊娠中的孕产妇和新生儿发病率和死亡率。材料与方法:2016年至2017年在多诺斯蒂亚大学医院进行回顾性队列研究,包括妊娠24+0周的单绒毛膜双羊膜和双绒毛膜双羊膜双胎。排除一个或两个胎儿产前死亡的妊娠。将患者分为待产组和计划剖宫产组。主要结局是孕产妇和新生儿的发病率和死亡率。统计分析包括χ 2、Fisher精确检验、Student t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和二元logistic回归模型。结果:248例双胞胎中,尝试分娩组173例(69.8%),计划剖宫产组75例(30.2%)。产妇发病率和死亡率无差异(OR 0.92;95% ci 0.36-2.36)。尝试组入院新生儿重症监护率较低(首胎OR 0.27;结论:虽然产程组二胎脐带动脉pH值较低,但新生儿发病率降低。因此,在选定的情况下,试产是一个适当的选择,不会增加产妇和新生儿的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Desenlaces maternofetales según la comparación entre intento de parto o cesárea programada en embarazos gemelares
OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality between trial of labor and planned caesarean section in twin pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS : A retrospective cohort study in Donostia University Hospital during 2016 and 2017 including monochorial-biamniotic and bichorial biamniotic twin pregnancies >24+0 weeks of gestation. Gestations with antenatal death of one or both fetuses were excluded. Patients were classified into trial of labor group and planned cesarean section group. Primary outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Statistical analysis included χ 2 , Fisher´s exact test, Student´s T-test, Mann-Whitney U test and binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 248 twin births, 173 (69.8%) were included in the attempted delivery group and 75 (30.2%) in the scheduled cesarean section group. No difference was found in maternal morbidity and mortality (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.36-2.36). The attempted group had lower rates of admission to neonatal intensive care (first twin OR 0.27; 95% of the delivery vs CONCLUSIONS: Although second twins’ umbilical artery pH is lower in trial of labor group, neonatal morbidity is decreased. Therefore, trial of labor in selected cases is an adequate option that does not increase maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico
Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Indizada en: Artemisa, Embase Cd/Obstetrics and Gynecology, Embase. Co/Pediatrics, Excerfta Médica, Índice Médico Latinoamericano, Lulacs, Medline, Science Citation Index, Ulrich, Ebsco.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信