{"title":"宫腔镜子宫内膜切除术与Mirena治疗排卵障碍围绝经期异常子宫出血的可重复性","authors":"Y. Sultan, S. Daoud","doi":"10.31579/2642-9756/122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of local levonorgestrel intrauterine releasing system and transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCER) in the management of perimenopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Patients and Methods: This study was done at Ain Shams and Al-Azhar University Maternity Hospitals during a period started from January 2019 to January 2021. Patients were followed up at the outpatient gynaecology clinics at regular schedules (3, 6 and 12 months) for one year duration. Perimenopausal patients with DUB were assigned randomly to either the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (n = 35) or endometrial resection (n = 45). Blood loss assessment charts were used to measure menstrual blood loss. Results: Total bleeding score/month decreased from a baseline median of 47.26 to 33.5 (P<0.01) for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and from 47.13 to 33.9 (P<0.01) for transcervical resection of the endometrium. There was no statically difference in bleeding score before and during treatment between the two groups of women. Conclusion: Both treatments levonorgestrel intrauterine system and transcervical resection of the endometrium efficiently reduced menstrual bleeding. levonorgestrel intrauterine system should be considered the first-line treatment for idiopathic menorrhagia because it is easy to insert, has a sustained effect, provides contraception, may reduce the need for surgery, and is cost-effective and well tolerated.","PeriodicalId":93058,"journal":{"name":"Women health care and issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reproducibility of Treatment of Perimenopausal Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Due to Ovulatory Dysfunction with Hysteroscopic Endometrial Resection versus Mirena\",\"authors\":\"Y. Sultan, S. Daoud\",\"doi\":\"10.31579/2642-9756/122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the efficacy of local levonorgestrel intrauterine releasing system and transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCER) in the management of perimenopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Patients and Methods: This study was done at Ain Shams and Al-Azhar University Maternity Hospitals during a period started from January 2019 to January 2021. Patients were followed up at the outpatient gynaecology clinics at regular schedules (3, 6 and 12 months) for one year duration. Perimenopausal patients with DUB were assigned randomly to either the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (n = 35) or endometrial resection (n = 45). Blood loss assessment charts were used to measure menstrual blood loss. Results: Total bleeding score/month decreased from a baseline median of 47.26 to 33.5 (P<0.01) for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and from 47.13 to 33.9 (P<0.01) for transcervical resection of the endometrium. There was no statically difference in bleeding score before and during treatment between the two groups of women. Conclusion: Both treatments levonorgestrel intrauterine system and transcervical resection of the endometrium efficiently reduced menstrual bleeding. levonorgestrel intrauterine system should be considered the first-line treatment for idiopathic menorrhagia because it is easy to insert, has a sustained effect, provides contraception, may reduce the need for surgery, and is cost-effective and well tolerated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women health care and issues\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women health care and issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women health care and issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Reproducibility of Treatment of Perimenopausal Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Due to Ovulatory Dysfunction with Hysteroscopic Endometrial Resection versus Mirena
Objective: To compare the efficacy of local levonorgestrel intrauterine releasing system and transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCER) in the management of perimenopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Patients and Methods: This study was done at Ain Shams and Al-Azhar University Maternity Hospitals during a period started from January 2019 to January 2021. Patients were followed up at the outpatient gynaecology clinics at regular schedules (3, 6 and 12 months) for one year duration. Perimenopausal patients with DUB were assigned randomly to either the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (n = 35) or endometrial resection (n = 45). Blood loss assessment charts were used to measure menstrual blood loss. Results: Total bleeding score/month decreased from a baseline median of 47.26 to 33.5 (P<0.01) for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and from 47.13 to 33.9 (P<0.01) for transcervical resection of the endometrium. There was no statically difference in bleeding score before and during treatment between the two groups of women. Conclusion: Both treatments levonorgestrel intrauterine system and transcervical resection of the endometrium efficiently reduced menstrual bleeding. levonorgestrel intrauterine system should be considered the first-line treatment for idiopathic menorrhagia because it is easy to insert, has a sustained effect, provides contraception, may reduce the need for surgery, and is cost-effective and well tolerated.