接受性遗忘症与赞成

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
N. Smith
{"title":"接受性遗忘症与赞成","authors":"N. Smith","doi":"10.1353/ecu.2023.a902006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"precis:This essay engages Cheryl Bridges Johns's call at the 2007 Global Christian Forum gathering for a death of the \"old mainstream ecumenical paradigm\" and the current strategies employed within the modern ecumenical movement. Taking up this call, it begins by exploring new \"ways of knowing,\" for which Johns called, and suggests the epistemological work of nineteenth-century theologian John Henry Newman as being a seedbed for alternatives that will enliven the ecumenical movement. Particularly, it offers a Newmanian reading of Receptive Ecumenism in order to suggest that this new paradigm must include ecclesial and personal transformation through the practice of assent between churches. Receptive Ecumenism calls for a posture of learning and transformation by attending to the needs or \"wounds\" of one's own church and to seek new ways forward through the reception of expressions of the church of Christ, or the reign of God, found within one's ecumenical other. This essay argues that, beyond simply notional learning, Receptive Ecumenism, read through the lens of Newman, offers a path forward for transformation through its emphasis on real apprehension of the ecumenical other and the practice or application of that which is received with \"dynamic integrity.\"","PeriodicalId":43047,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES","volume":"58 1","pages":"234 - 258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Receptive Ecumenism and Assent\",\"authors\":\"N. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ecu.2023.a902006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"precis:This essay engages Cheryl Bridges Johns's call at the 2007 Global Christian Forum gathering for a death of the \\\"old mainstream ecumenical paradigm\\\" and the current strategies employed within the modern ecumenical movement. Taking up this call, it begins by exploring new \\\"ways of knowing,\\\" for which Johns called, and suggests the epistemological work of nineteenth-century theologian John Henry Newman as being a seedbed for alternatives that will enliven the ecumenical movement. Particularly, it offers a Newmanian reading of Receptive Ecumenism in order to suggest that this new paradigm must include ecclesial and personal transformation through the practice of assent between churches. Receptive Ecumenism calls for a posture of learning and transformation by attending to the needs or \\\"wounds\\\" of one's own church and to seek new ways forward through the reception of expressions of the church of Christ, or the reign of God, found within one's ecumenical other. This essay argues that, beyond simply notional learning, Receptive Ecumenism, read through the lens of Newman, offers a path forward for transformation through its emphasis on real apprehension of the ecumenical other and the practice or application of that which is received with \\\"dynamic integrity.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":43047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"234 - 258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2023.a902006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2023.a902006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章引用了Cheryl Bridges Johns在2007年全球基督教论坛上的呼吁,即“旧主流普世范式”的消亡以及现代普世运动中采用的当前策略。接受这一呼吁,它从探索约翰所称的新的“认识方式”开始,并认为19世纪神学家约翰·亨利·纽曼的认识论工作是活跃普世运动的替代方案的温床。特别是,它提供了对接受普世主义的Newmanian解读,以表明这种新的范式必须包括通过教会之间的一致实践进行的教会和个人转变。接受普世主义要求通过关注自己教会的需求或“创伤”来采取一种学习和转变的姿态,并通过接受在普世另一方中发现的基督教会或上帝统治的表达来寻求新的前进道路。本文认为,除了简单的概念学习之外,通过纽曼的视角阅读的接受普世主义,通过强调对普世他者的真正理解,以及对以“动态完整性”接受的事物的实践或应用,为转型提供了一条前进的道路
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Receptive Ecumenism and Assent
precis:This essay engages Cheryl Bridges Johns's call at the 2007 Global Christian Forum gathering for a death of the "old mainstream ecumenical paradigm" and the current strategies employed within the modern ecumenical movement. Taking up this call, it begins by exploring new "ways of knowing," for which Johns called, and suggests the epistemological work of nineteenth-century theologian John Henry Newman as being a seedbed for alternatives that will enliven the ecumenical movement. Particularly, it offers a Newmanian reading of Receptive Ecumenism in order to suggest that this new paradigm must include ecclesial and personal transformation through the practice of assent between churches. Receptive Ecumenism calls for a posture of learning and transformation by attending to the needs or "wounds" of one's own church and to seek new ways forward through the reception of expressions of the church of Christ, or the reign of God, found within one's ecumenical other. This essay argues that, beyond simply notional learning, Receptive Ecumenism, read through the lens of Newman, offers a path forward for transformation through its emphasis on real apprehension of the ecumenical other and the practice or application of that which is received with "dynamic integrity."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信