{"title":"亚裔美国女大学生的身体羞耻感:性物化、内化种族主义和种族认同力量的作用","authors":"Hsiu-Lan Cheng","doi":"10.1080/09515070.2022.2065664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Informed by objectification theory’s tenet that sexual objectification and racism are powerful sociocultural forces that perniciously impact women of color’s mental health, the present study examined the longitudinal links of sexual objectification and three forms of internalized racism (i.e. self-negativity, weakness stereotype, appearance bias) with body shame among Asian American college women (N = 146). Ethnic identity strength, a theorized protective factor in body image literature, was examined as a moderator for the hypothesized longitudinal links. Results indicated that sexual objectification and self-negativity measured at Time 1 had significant and positive bivariate associations with body shame measured at Time 2. However, these variables no longer predicted body shame when body mass index (BMI) was included as a covariate. A significant interaction between appearance bias and ethnic identity strength emerged in predicting body shame. Specifically, high ethnic identity strength exacerbated the detrimental effect of appearance bias on Asian American women’s body shame, whereas low ethnic identity strength buffered this effect. This finding contradicts theoretical views of ethnic identity strength as a protective factor in women of color’s body image development. Practice implications and future research directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51653,"journal":{"name":"Counselling Psychology Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Body shame among Asian American college women: the roles of sexual objectification, internalized racism, and ethnic identity strength\",\"authors\":\"Hsiu-Lan Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09515070.2022.2065664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Informed by objectification theory’s tenet that sexual objectification and racism are powerful sociocultural forces that perniciously impact women of color’s mental health, the present study examined the longitudinal links of sexual objectification and three forms of internalized racism (i.e. self-negativity, weakness stereotype, appearance bias) with body shame among Asian American college women (N = 146). Ethnic identity strength, a theorized protective factor in body image literature, was examined as a moderator for the hypothesized longitudinal links. Results indicated that sexual objectification and self-negativity measured at Time 1 had significant and positive bivariate associations with body shame measured at Time 2. However, these variables no longer predicted body shame when body mass index (BMI) was included as a covariate. A significant interaction between appearance bias and ethnic identity strength emerged in predicting body shame. Specifically, high ethnic identity strength exacerbated the detrimental effect of appearance bias on Asian American women’s body shame, whereas low ethnic identity strength buffered this effect. This finding contradicts theoretical views of ethnic identity strength as a protective factor in women of color’s body image development. Practice implications and future research directions are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counselling Psychology Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counselling Psychology Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2022.2065664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling Psychology Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2022.2065664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Body shame among Asian American college women: the roles of sexual objectification, internalized racism, and ethnic identity strength
ABSTRACT Informed by objectification theory’s tenet that sexual objectification and racism are powerful sociocultural forces that perniciously impact women of color’s mental health, the present study examined the longitudinal links of sexual objectification and three forms of internalized racism (i.e. self-negativity, weakness stereotype, appearance bias) with body shame among Asian American college women (N = 146). Ethnic identity strength, a theorized protective factor in body image literature, was examined as a moderator for the hypothesized longitudinal links. Results indicated that sexual objectification and self-negativity measured at Time 1 had significant and positive bivariate associations with body shame measured at Time 2. However, these variables no longer predicted body shame when body mass index (BMI) was included as a covariate. A significant interaction between appearance bias and ethnic identity strength emerged in predicting body shame. Specifically, high ethnic identity strength exacerbated the detrimental effect of appearance bias on Asian American women’s body shame, whereas low ethnic identity strength buffered this effect. This finding contradicts theoretical views of ethnic identity strength as a protective factor in women of color’s body image development. Practice implications and future research directions are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Counselling Psychology Quarterly is an international interdisciplinary journal, reporting on practice, research and theory. The journal is particularly keen to encourage and publish papers which will be of immediate practical relevance to counselling, clinical, occupational, health and medical psychologists throughout the world. Original, independently refereed contributions will be included on practice, research and theory - and especially articles which integrate these three areas - from whatever methodological or theoretical standpoint. The journal will also include international peer review commentaries on major issues.