化疗GemCap +米托坦作为转移性肾上腺皮质癌二线及后续治疗的有效性

Y. A. Zhulikov, E. Kovalenko, V. Bokhyan, M. V. Khoroshilov, D. A. Goryainov, A. Roslyakova, S. S. Magamedova, E. Evdokimova, E. Artamonova
{"title":"化疗GemCap +米托坦作为转移性肾上腺皮质癌二线及后续治疗的有效性","authors":"Y. A. Zhulikov, E. Kovalenko, V. Bokhyan, M. V. Khoroshilov, D. A. Goryainov, A. Roslyakova, S. S. Magamedova, E. Evdokimova, E. Artamonova","doi":"10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-3-36-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Combination of gemcitabine, metronomic capecitabine and mitotane (GemCap + m) is the most studied regimen in second and subsequent lines of therapy for advanced adrenocortical cancer (ACC). Previously published studies do not give a definitive answer to the question- what plays a key role in realizing the response to treatment: chemotherapy or mitotane in therapeutic concentration.Aim. Evaluation the efficacy and safety of GemCap + m combination with the standard dosing regimen of capecitabine in patients with metastatic ACC.Materials and methods. This retrospective single-center clinical study included patients over 18 years of age with histologically confirmed ACC with disease progression after completion of platinum-containing therapy. They received chemotherapy regimen gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 for days 1, 8 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally 2 times at days 1–14 of the 21-day cycle with mitotane. we evaluated objective response, stabilization of disease, 6-months disease control rate and median progression-free and overall survival. Radiological assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was carried out every 6–8 weeks of treatment.Results. The study included 25 patients. mitotane concentration above 14 ng/mL was achieved in 22 (88 %) patients, of which 21 (84 %) reached therapeutic concentration in previous treatment lines. 80 % of patients received treatment as 2nd line, 20 % as 3rd and subsequent lines. The objective responses and disease stabilization was observed in 1 (4 %) and 11 (44 %) of patients, respectively. Disease control for at least 6 months rate was 24 %. median progression-free and overall survival were 3.2 months and 12.17 months, respectively. Toxicity grade 3–4 was observed in 28 % of patients. gemcitabine dose reductions due to thrombocytopenia grade 1–2 were required in 2 cases (8 %), no capecitabine reductions were necessary.Conclusion. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a new dose regimen of chemotherapy GemCap + m in the second and subsequent lines of therapy for metastatic ACC. The progression of the disease against the background of previous lines of therapy at a therapeutic concentration of mitotane in the majority of patients indicates the effectiveness of the chemotherapeutic component of gemCap in a cohort of patients resistant to platinum and mitotane.","PeriodicalId":34449,"journal":{"name":"Tazovaia khirurgiia i onkologiia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of chemotherapy GemCap + mitotane as second and subsequent lines of therapy for metastatic adrenocortical cancer\",\"authors\":\"Y. A. Zhulikov, E. Kovalenko, V. Bokhyan, M. V. Khoroshilov, D. A. Goryainov, A. Roslyakova, S. S. Magamedova, E. Evdokimova, E. Artamonova\",\"doi\":\"10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-3-36-42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Combination of gemcitabine, metronomic capecitabine and mitotane (GemCap + m) is the most studied regimen in second and subsequent lines of therapy for advanced adrenocortical cancer (ACC). Previously published studies do not give a definitive answer to the question- what plays a key role in realizing the response to treatment: chemotherapy or mitotane in therapeutic concentration.Aim. Evaluation the efficacy and safety of GemCap + m combination with the standard dosing regimen of capecitabine in patients with metastatic ACC.Materials and methods. This retrospective single-center clinical study included patients over 18 years of age with histologically confirmed ACC with disease progression after completion of platinum-containing therapy. They received chemotherapy regimen gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 for days 1, 8 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally 2 times at days 1–14 of the 21-day cycle with mitotane. we evaluated objective response, stabilization of disease, 6-months disease control rate and median progression-free and overall survival. Radiological assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was carried out every 6–8 weeks of treatment.Results. The study included 25 patients. mitotane concentration above 14 ng/mL was achieved in 22 (88 %) patients, of which 21 (84 %) reached therapeutic concentration in previous treatment lines. 80 % of patients received treatment as 2nd line, 20 % as 3rd and subsequent lines. The objective responses and disease stabilization was observed in 1 (4 %) and 11 (44 %) of patients, respectively. Disease control for at least 6 months rate was 24 %. median progression-free and overall survival were 3.2 months and 12.17 months, respectively. Toxicity grade 3–4 was observed in 28 % of patients. gemcitabine dose reductions due to thrombocytopenia grade 1–2 were required in 2 cases (8 %), no capecitabine reductions were necessary.Conclusion. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a new dose regimen of chemotherapy GemCap + m in the second and subsequent lines of therapy for metastatic ACC. The progression of the disease against the background of previous lines of therapy at a therapeutic concentration of mitotane in the majority of patients indicates the effectiveness of the chemotherapeutic component of gemCap in a cohort of patients resistant to platinum and mitotane.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tazovaia khirurgiia i onkologiia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tazovaia khirurgiia i onkologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-3-36-42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tazovaia khirurgiia i onkologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-3-36-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。吉西他滨、节拍卡培他滨和米托坦联合(GemCap + m)是晚期肾上腺皮质癌(ACC)二线及后续治疗中研究最多的方案。先前发表的研究并没有给出一个明确的答案——什么在实现治疗反应中起关键作用:化疗还是治疗浓度的米托坦。评估GemCap + m联合卡培他滨标准给药方案治疗转移性ACC患者的疗效和安全性。材料和方法。这项回顾性单中心临床研究纳入了18岁以上组织学证实的ACC患者,患者在完成含铂治疗后疾病进展。化疗方案:吉西他滨800 mg/m2,第1、8天,卡培他滨1000 mg/m2,口服2次,第1- 14天,21天周期,米托坦。我们评估了客观反应、疾病稳定、6个月疾病控制率、中位无进展生存期和总生存期。治疗后每6 ~ 8周按RECIST 1.1标准进行放射学评估。该研究包括25名患者。22例(88%)患者的米托坦浓度高于14 ng/mL,其中21例(84%)患者在既往治疗中达到治疗浓度。80%的患者接受二线治疗,20%的患者接受三线及后续治疗。分别有1例(4%)和11例(44%)患者观察到客观反应和疾病稳定。6个月以上疾病控制率为24%。中位无进展生存期和总生存期分别为3.2个月和12.17个月。28%的患者毒性为3-4级。2例(8%)因1-2级血小板减少症需要减少吉西他滨剂量,卡培他滨不需要减少剂量。这项研究证明了GemCap + m化疗新剂量方案在转移性ACC的二线及后续治疗中的有效性。在先前大多数患者以治疗浓度米托坦治疗的背景下,该疾病的进展表明gemCap的化疗成分在对铂和米托坦耐药的患者队列中有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency of chemotherapy GemCap + mitotane as second and subsequent lines of therapy for metastatic adrenocortical cancer
Background. Combination of gemcitabine, metronomic capecitabine and mitotane (GemCap + m) is the most studied regimen in second and subsequent lines of therapy for advanced adrenocortical cancer (ACC). Previously published studies do not give a definitive answer to the question- what plays a key role in realizing the response to treatment: chemotherapy or mitotane in therapeutic concentration.Aim. Evaluation the efficacy and safety of GemCap + m combination with the standard dosing regimen of capecitabine in patients with metastatic ACC.Materials and methods. This retrospective single-center clinical study included patients over 18 years of age with histologically confirmed ACC with disease progression after completion of platinum-containing therapy. They received chemotherapy regimen gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 for days 1, 8 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally 2 times at days 1–14 of the 21-day cycle with mitotane. we evaluated objective response, stabilization of disease, 6-months disease control rate and median progression-free and overall survival. Radiological assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was carried out every 6–8 weeks of treatment.Results. The study included 25 patients. mitotane concentration above 14 ng/mL was achieved in 22 (88 %) patients, of which 21 (84 %) reached therapeutic concentration in previous treatment lines. 80 % of patients received treatment as 2nd line, 20 % as 3rd and subsequent lines. The objective responses and disease stabilization was observed in 1 (4 %) and 11 (44 %) of patients, respectively. Disease control for at least 6 months rate was 24 %. median progression-free and overall survival were 3.2 months and 12.17 months, respectively. Toxicity grade 3–4 was observed in 28 % of patients. gemcitabine dose reductions due to thrombocytopenia grade 1–2 were required in 2 cases (8 %), no capecitabine reductions were necessary.Conclusion. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a new dose regimen of chemotherapy GemCap + m in the second and subsequent lines of therapy for metastatic ACC. The progression of the disease against the background of previous lines of therapy at a therapeutic concentration of mitotane in the majority of patients indicates the effectiveness of the chemotherapeutic component of gemCap in a cohort of patients resistant to platinum and mitotane.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信