无状态与女权主义工具箱:另一个有女权主义解决方案的男人制造的问题?

IF 1.7 Q3 Social Sciences
Deirdre Brennan
{"title":"无状态与女权主义工具箱:另一个有女权主义解决方案的男人制造的问题?","authors":"Deirdre Brennan","doi":"10.5334/TILR.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At its goal, a feminist analysis of statelessness solutions would mean the rethinking and revision of patriarchal structures and principles which create and perpetuate statelessness and add further subjugation to women and minorities affected by statelessness. This paper explores the potentiality of a feminist critique of statelessness for the dual objective of creating meaningful solutions to statelessness and as a means to push statelessness out of its confines as a subject in law, to an interdisciplinary field in its own right: Statelessness Studies. A feminist analysis during these formative years of statelessness research, is called for to avoid the pitfalls of other scholarship, which after neglecting gender/power differences for centuries must now “add women and stir”. Drawing inspiration from the seminal work of feminist critiques of international law, this paper traces the “compartmentalization of gender” in statelessness work since 1954, identifies the persistent gap in feminist-statelessness research today, and provides research questions and ideas that could begin filling in those gaps. Through the limited canon of feminist-statelessness scholarship to-date, this paper shows how a feminist analysis can provide a valuable tool to the statelessness sector for challenging the structures that permit hierarchies, privilege and domination. Such structures, this paper argues, have been the recipe for the creation, maintenance and growth of stateless populations.","PeriodicalId":38415,"journal":{"name":"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statelessness and the Feminist Toolbox: Another Man-Made Problem with a\\n Feminist Solution?\",\"authors\":\"Deirdre Brennan\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/TILR.152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At its goal, a feminist analysis of statelessness solutions would mean the rethinking and revision of patriarchal structures and principles which create and perpetuate statelessness and add further subjugation to women and minorities affected by statelessness. This paper explores the potentiality of a feminist critique of statelessness for the dual objective of creating meaningful solutions to statelessness and as a means to push statelessness out of its confines as a subject in law, to an interdisciplinary field in its own right: Statelessness Studies. A feminist analysis during these formative years of statelessness research, is called for to avoid the pitfalls of other scholarship, which after neglecting gender/power differences for centuries must now “add women and stir”. Drawing inspiration from the seminal work of feminist critiques of international law, this paper traces the “compartmentalization of gender” in statelessness work since 1954, identifies the persistent gap in feminist-statelessness research today, and provides research questions and ideas that could begin filling in those gaps. Through the limited canon of feminist-statelessness scholarship to-date, this paper shows how a feminist analysis can provide a valuable tool to the statelessness sector for challenging the structures that permit hierarchies, privilege and domination. Such structures, this paper argues, have been the recipe for the creation, maintenance and growth of stateless populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/TILR.152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/TILR.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

其目标是,对无国籍问题解决方案进行女权主义分析,意味着重新思考和修订父权制结构和原则,这些结构和原则造成并延续了无国籍状态,并进一步征服了受无国籍状态影响的妇女和少数群体。本文探讨了女权主义对无国籍状态的批判的潜力,其双重目标是为无国籍状态创造有意义的解决方案,并将无国籍状态从法律学科的局限中推向一个跨学科领域:无国籍研究。在无国籍状态研究形成的这些年里,有人呼吁进行女权主义分析,以避免其他学术的陷阱,在几个世纪以来忽视性别/权力差异后,这些学术现在必须“增加女性并引起轰动”。本文从女权主义对国际法的批评这一开创性工作中汲取灵感,追溯了1954年以来无国籍状态工作中的“性别划分”,确定了当今女权主义无国籍状态研究中持续存在的空白,并提出了可以开始填补这些空白的研究问题和想法。通过迄今为止有限的女权主义无国籍学术经典,本文展示了女权主义分析如何为无国籍部门挑战允许等级制度、特权和统治的结构提供有价值的工具。本文认为,这种结构是无国籍人口产生、维持和增长的秘诀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statelessness and the Feminist Toolbox: Another Man-Made Problem with a Feminist Solution?
At its goal, a feminist analysis of statelessness solutions would mean the rethinking and revision of patriarchal structures and principles which create and perpetuate statelessness and add further subjugation to women and minorities affected by statelessness. This paper explores the potentiality of a feminist critique of statelessness for the dual objective of creating meaningful solutions to statelessness and as a means to push statelessness out of its confines as a subject in law, to an interdisciplinary field in its own right: Statelessness Studies. A feminist analysis during these formative years of statelessness research, is called for to avoid the pitfalls of other scholarship, which after neglecting gender/power differences for centuries must now “add women and stir”. Drawing inspiration from the seminal work of feminist critiques of international law, this paper traces the “compartmentalization of gender” in statelessness work since 1954, identifies the persistent gap in feminist-statelessness research today, and provides research questions and ideas that could begin filling in those gaps. Through the limited canon of feminist-statelessness scholarship to-date, this paper shows how a feminist analysis can provide a valuable tool to the statelessness sector for challenging the structures that permit hierarchies, privilege and domination. Such structures, this paper argues, have been the recipe for the creation, maintenance and growth of stateless populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信