希雅的献身形而上学ṅ卡拉德瓦(1449–1568):基督复临安息日会的婆罗门

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
A. Barua
{"title":"希雅的献身形而上学ṅ卡拉德瓦(1449–1568):基督复临安息日会的婆罗门","authors":"A. Barua","doi":"10.17863/CAM.12571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compared to the rich literature that exists on the classical triumvirate of Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and Madhva, as well as the ongoing modernised transformations of these Vedāntic streams, the body of scholarly works on the metaphysical and theological reformulations of the Vedāntic sources in the late medieval centuries remains relatively insignificant. Certain contemporary readings of the Vedāntic traditions present the interiorised apprehension of the transcendental self (jñāna) and the devotional love of the supremely personal Lord (bhakti) as sharply opposed. However, as we will see, various forms of Advaita Vedānta as well as devotional Vedānta developed during the medieval centuries diverse hermeneutic strategies of positioning and repositioning jñāna and bhakti in their own conceptual-soteriological systems. These Vedāntic systems do not place jñāna and bhakti in hermetically sealed compartments but interweave them from within their distinctive metaphysical structures. Our discussion of the Assamese poet-saint Śaṅkaradeva (1449–1568) will highlight these broader themes in the reception histories of the Vedāntic materials. Śaṅkaradeva developed a distinctive pattern of devotional metaphysics rooted primarily in the Bhāgavata-purāṇa, where the ultimate reality, which is indicated with highly characteristic Advaitic analogies, is also repeatedly described as the beloved friend who lovingly protects the devotees and who even becomes subservient to them. Perhaps not surprisingly, a major point of contention in the contemporary literature on Śaṅkaradeva, in Assamese, Bengali, and Hindi, relates to whether he should be classified as an Advaitin or as a follower of Rāmānuja’s theological system.","PeriodicalId":42357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hindu Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"301-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Devotional Metaphysics of Śaṅkaradeva (1449–1568): The Advaitic Brahman as the Beloved Friend\",\"authors\":\"A. Barua\",\"doi\":\"10.17863/CAM.12571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Compared to the rich literature that exists on the classical triumvirate of Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and Madhva, as well as the ongoing modernised transformations of these Vedāntic streams, the body of scholarly works on the metaphysical and theological reformulations of the Vedāntic sources in the late medieval centuries remains relatively insignificant. Certain contemporary readings of the Vedāntic traditions present the interiorised apprehension of the transcendental self (jñāna) and the devotional love of the supremely personal Lord (bhakti) as sharply opposed. However, as we will see, various forms of Advaita Vedānta as well as devotional Vedānta developed during the medieval centuries diverse hermeneutic strategies of positioning and repositioning jñāna and bhakti in their own conceptual-soteriological systems. These Vedāntic systems do not place jñāna and bhakti in hermetically sealed compartments but interweave them from within their distinctive metaphysical structures. Our discussion of the Assamese poet-saint Śaṅkaradeva (1449–1568) will highlight these broader themes in the reception histories of the Vedāntic materials. Śaṅkaradeva developed a distinctive pattern of devotional metaphysics rooted primarily in the Bhāgavata-purāṇa, where the ultimate reality, which is indicated with highly characteristic Advaitic analogies, is also repeatedly described as the beloved friend who lovingly protects the devotees and who even becomes subservient to them. Perhaps not surprisingly, a major point of contention in the contemporary literature on Śaṅkaradeva, in Assamese, Bengali, and Hindi, relates to whether he should be classified as an Advaitin or as a follower of Rāmānuja’s theological system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hindu Studies\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"301-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hindu Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.12571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hindu Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.12571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与存在于西亚古典三巨头身上的丰富文学相比ṅkara、Rāmānuja和Madhva,以及这些吠陀流正在进行的现代化转型,关于中世纪晚期吠陀来源的形而上学和神学重新表述的学术著作仍然相对微不足道。某些对吠陀传统的当代解读呈现了对超验自我(jñāna)的内在理解和对至高无上的个人主(巴克提)的虔诚之爱,这两者截然相反。然而,正如我们将看到的那样,在中世纪的几个世纪里,各种形式的Adwaita Vedānta以及虔诚的Vedā。这些吠陀体系并没有将jñāna和巴克提置于密封的隔间中,而是将它们从其独特的形而上学结构中交织在一起。我们对阿萨姆诗人圣人的讨论ṅ卡拉德瓦(1449-1568)将在吠陀材料的接受历史中突出这些更广泛的主题。西雅ṅ卡拉德瓦发展了一种独特的虔诚形而上学模式,主要植根于《比伽梵陀经》ṇa、 在那里,终极现实,用极具特色的基督复临安息日类比来表示,也被反复描述为亲爱的朋友,他慈爱地保护奉献者,甚至屈从于他们。也许并不奇怪,这是当代文学中一个主要的争论点ṅkaradeva,在阿萨姆语、孟加拉语和印地语中,涉及到他应该被归类为Adwaitin还是Rāmānuja神学体系的追随者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Devotional Metaphysics of Śaṅkaradeva (1449–1568): The Advaitic Brahman as the Beloved Friend
Compared to the rich literature that exists on the classical triumvirate of Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and Madhva, as well as the ongoing modernised transformations of these Vedāntic streams, the body of scholarly works on the metaphysical and theological reformulations of the Vedāntic sources in the late medieval centuries remains relatively insignificant. Certain contemporary readings of the Vedāntic traditions present the interiorised apprehension of the transcendental self (jñāna) and the devotional love of the supremely personal Lord (bhakti) as sharply opposed. However, as we will see, various forms of Advaita Vedānta as well as devotional Vedānta developed during the medieval centuries diverse hermeneutic strategies of positioning and repositioning jñāna and bhakti in their own conceptual-soteriological systems. These Vedāntic systems do not place jñāna and bhakti in hermetically sealed compartments but interweave them from within their distinctive metaphysical structures. Our discussion of the Assamese poet-saint Śaṅkaradeva (1449–1568) will highlight these broader themes in the reception histories of the Vedāntic materials. Śaṅkaradeva developed a distinctive pattern of devotional metaphysics rooted primarily in the Bhāgavata-purāṇa, where the ultimate reality, which is indicated with highly characteristic Advaitic analogies, is also repeatedly described as the beloved friend who lovingly protects the devotees and who even becomes subservient to them. Perhaps not surprisingly, a major point of contention in the contemporary literature on Śaṅkaradeva, in Assamese, Bengali, and Hindi, relates to whether he should be classified as an Advaitin or as a follower of Rāmānuja’s theological system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hindu Studies is committed to a critical approach to Hindu Studies, focusing on themes that address overarching issues within the field, publishing the proceedings of research projects and conferences, and providing a forum for peer-reviewed articles. The journal aims to create a forum for constructive interdisciplinary discourse by linking the wider community of scholars in an exploration of key questions, through the lens of their own research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信