对附属物和协调的合理性抱有幻想

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ian Cunnings, P. Sturt
{"title":"对附属物和协调的合理性抱有幻想","authors":"Ian Cunnings, P. Sturt","doi":"10.1080/23273798.2023.2235033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Illusions of grammaticality, where ungrammatical sentences are misperceived as grammatical (e.g. The key to the cabinets were rusty), have been widely studied during language comprehension. Such grammatical illusions have been in fl uential in debate surrounding so-called representational and retrieval-based accounts of linguistic dependency resolution. Whether analogous illusions of plausibility occur at the level of semantic interpretation has only recently begun to be examined, and thus far, these illusions have been restricted to a narrow range of linguistic phenomena. In two eye-tracking during reading experiments (n = 48 in each) and two self-paced reading experiments (n = 192 in each) we examined the possibility of semantic illusions during the processing of adjuncts and co-ordination. Across experiments, our results suggest illusions of plausibility during dependency resolution, though interference e ff ects were clearer in adjuncts than co-ordination. We argue that our fi ndings are more compatible with retrieval-based rather than representational accounts of linguistic dependency resolution.","PeriodicalId":48782,"journal":{"name":"Language Cognition and Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illusions of plausibility in adjuncts and co-ordination\",\"authors\":\"Ian Cunnings, P. Sturt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23273798.2023.2235033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Illusions of grammaticality, where ungrammatical sentences are misperceived as grammatical (e.g. The key to the cabinets were rusty), have been widely studied during language comprehension. Such grammatical illusions have been in fl uential in debate surrounding so-called representational and retrieval-based accounts of linguistic dependency resolution. Whether analogous illusions of plausibility occur at the level of semantic interpretation has only recently begun to be examined, and thus far, these illusions have been restricted to a narrow range of linguistic phenomena. In two eye-tracking during reading experiments (n = 48 in each) and two self-paced reading experiments (n = 192 in each) we examined the possibility of semantic illusions during the processing of adjuncts and co-ordination. Across experiments, our results suggest illusions of plausibility during dependency resolution, though interference e ff ects were clearer in adjuncts than co-ordination. We argue that our fi ndings are more compatible with retrieval-based rather than representational accounts of linguistic dependency resolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Cognition and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Cognition and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2235033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Cognition and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2235033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语法性错觉,即不符合语法的句子被误认为符合语法的句子(如柜子的钥匙生锈了),在语言理解过程中得到了广泛的研究。这种语法错觉在围绕所谓的表征性和基于检索的语言依赖解决方案的辩论中发挥了重要作用。类似的似是而非的错觉是否发生在语义解释的层面上,直到最近才开始被研究,到目前为止,这些错觉被限制在一个狭窄的语言现象范围内。在两个阅读过程中的眼动追踪实验(每个实验n = 48)和两个自定节奏阅读实验(每个实验n = 192)中,我们研究了在辅助词和协调加工过程中语义错觉的可能性。在实验中,我们的结果表明,在依赖性解决过程中存在似是而非的错觉,尽管干扰效应在辅助关系中比协调关系更明显。我们认为,我们的研究结果更符合基于检索而不是表征的语言依赖解决方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Illusions of plausibility in adjuncts and co-ordination
Illusions of grammaticality, where ungrammatical sentences are misperceived as grammatical (e.g. The key to the cabinets were rusty), have been widely studied during language comprehension. Such grammatical illusions have been in fl uential in debate surrounding so-called representational and retrieval-based accounts of linguistic dependency resolution. Whether analogous illusions of plausibility occur at the level of semantic interpretation has only recently begun to be examined, and thus far, these illusions have been restricted to a narrow range of linguistic phenomena. In two eye-tracking during reading experiments (n = 48 in each) and two self-paced reading experiments (n = 192 in each) we examined the possibility of semantic illusions during the processing of adjuncts and co-ordination. Across experiments, our results suggest illusions of plausibility during dependency resolution, though interference e ff ects were clearer in adjuncts than co-ordination. We argue that our fi ndings are more compatible with retrieval-based rather than representational accounts of linguistic dependency resolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Cognition and Neuroscience
Language Cognition and Neuroscience AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
13.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience (formerly titled Language and Cognitive Processes) publishes high-quality papers taking an interdisciplinary approach to the study of brain and language, and promotes studies that integrate cognitive theoretical accounts of language and its neural bases. We publish both high quality, theoretically-motivated cognitive behavioural studies of language function, and papers which integrate cognitive theoretical accounts of language with its neurobiological foundations. The study of language function from a cognitive neuroscience perspective has attracted intensive research interest over the last 20 years, and the development of neuroscience methodologies has significantly broadened the empirical scope of all language research. Both hemodynamic imaging and electrophysiological approaches provide new perspectives on the representation and processing of language, and place important constraints on the development of theoretical accounts of language function and its neurobiological context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信