巴西社会学理论与后殖民批评

Q3 Social Sciences

Sociedade e Estado Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010009

Lucas Amaral de Oliveira, Ana Rodrigues Cavalcanti Alves

{"title":"巴西社会学理论与后殖民批评","authors":"Lucas Amaral de Oliveira, Ana Rodrigues Cavalcanti Alves","doi":"10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article discusses to what extent sociological theories produced in the Brazilian academic field dialogue with a global intellectual movement criticizing coloniality and the Eurocentric foundations of the social sciences. Initially, we analyze the challenges regarding the attempts to define two theoretical approaches, Brazilian sociology, and Postcolonial Thought, without overlooking their internal heterogeneities. Then, we address the tensions between these approaches as conditions for research agendas that bring both contributions into proximity. Finally, we explore the epistemological potential of one of these agendas, which corresponds to a rereading of Brazilian sociological theory in light of postcolonial criticism. This exercise in rereading the canon is based on the methodological program of sociological reduction of Guerreiro Ramos, which indicates a reciprocal interrogation between Brazilian sociology and postcolonial thought, i.e., a decentered look at our sociological tradition that also reveals contributions from this tradition for the future of postcolonial epistemologies.","PeriodicalId":35260,"journal":{"name":"Sociedade e Estado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brazilian sociological theory and postcolonial criticism\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Amaral de Oliveira, Ana Rodrigues Cavalcanti Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The article discusses to what extent sociological theories produced in the Brazilian academic field dialogue with a global intellectual movement criticizing coloniality and the Eurocentric foundations of the social sciences. Initially, we analyze the challenges regarding the attempts to define two theoretical approaches, Brazilian sociology, and Postcolonial Thought, without overlooking their internal heterogeneities. Then, we address the tensions between these approaches as conditions for research agendas that bring both contributions into proximity. Finally, we explore the epistemological potential of one of these agendas, which corresponds to a rereading of Brazilian sociological theory in light of postcolonial criticism. This exercise in rereading the canon is based on the methodological program of sociological reduction of Guerreiro Ramos, which indicates a reciprocal interrogation between Brazilian sociology and postcolonial thought, i.e., a decentered look at our sociological tradition that also reveals contributions from this tradition for the future of postcolonial epistemologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociedade e Estado\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociedade e Estado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociedade e Estado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202338010009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文讨论了社会学理论在巴西学术领域与批评殖民主义和欧洲中心社会科学基础的全球知识运动的对话中产生的程度。首先，我们分析了在不忽视其内部异质性的情况下，试图定义两种理论方法（巴西社会学和后殖民思想）的挑战。然后，我们将这些方法之间的紧张关系作为研究议程的条件，使这两种贡献接近。最后，我们探讨了其中一个议程的认识论潜力，这与根据后殖民批评重读巴西社会学理论相对应。重读正典的这一练习是基于Guerreiro Ramos的社会学还原的方法论程序，这表明巴西社会学和后殖民思想之间的相互审问，即对我们的社会学传统进行了分散的审视，也揭示了这一传统对后殖民认识论未来的贡献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Brazilian sociological theory and postcolonial criticism

Abstract The article discusses to what extent sociological theories produced in the Brazilian academic field dialogue with a global intellectual movement criticizing coloniality and the Eurocentric foundations of the social sciences. Initially, we analyze the challenges regarding the attempts to define two theoretical approaches, Brazilian sociology, and Postcolonial Thought, without overlooking their internal heterogeneities. Then, we address the tensions between these approaches as conditions for research agendas that bring both contributions into proximity. Finally, we explore the epistemological potential of one of these agendas, which corresponds to a rereading of Brazilian sociological theory in light of postcolonial criticism. This exercise in rereading the canon is based on the methodological program of sociological reduction of Guerreiro Ramos, which indicates a reciprocal interrogation between Brazilian sociology and postcolonial thought, i.e., a decentered look at our sociological tradition that also reveals contributions from this tradition for the future of postcolonial epistemologies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sociedade e Estado Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

13 weeks

期刊介绍： The review Sociedade e Estado has been edited by the Department of Sociology at the University of Brasilia since of 1986. In this period, original works related to Social Sciences were published in the following categories: theoretical studies, critical reviews of literature, research reports, technical reports, reviews and notices. Its abbreviated title is Soc. estado, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.