斯台普斯论文,地方模式与竞争力:2001-2001年资源繁荣时期的西澳大利亚经济

IF 1.8 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
P. Plummer, N. Argent
{"title":"斯台普斯论文,地方模式与竞争力:2001-2001年资源繁荣时期的西澳大利亚经济","authors":"P. Plummer, N. Argent","doi":"10.1080/23792949.2022.2107035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Conventionally, the Staples Thesis constitutes a hypothesis about both the historical and the geographical particularity of the developmental trajectories of resource-dependent economies (Staples Theory) and a methodology that prioritizes contextual or local knowledge (Staples Method). Situating the Staples Thesis in the conceptual framework of regulation theory, this paper develops a spatial econometric model of the dynamics of resource-dependent economies that is sensitive to place-based contingency. This model is grounded in a conceptual framework that distinguishes between a productivity regime and a demand regime whose qualitative properties depend on the assemblage of governance, regulatory and institutional norms that determine the coherence of the relationship between the structure of production and consumption. Within the limits of data availability, a spatial extension of a reduced-form Kaldorian growth model is employed to empirically test Staples Theory by focusing on the differential impact of both the demand regime and the productivity regime on the relative economic performance of Western Australian localities over the course of the recent (2001–11) resource boom.","PeriodicalId":31513,"journal":{"name":"Area Development and Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"212 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Staples Thesis, local models and competitiveness: the Western Australian economy over the 2001–2011 resource boom\",\"authors\":\"P. Plummer, N. Argent\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23792949.2022.2107035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Conventionally, the Staples Thesis constitutes a hypothesis about both the historical and the geographical particularity of the developmental trajectories of resource-dependent economies (Staples Theory) and a methodology that prioritizes contextual or local knowledge (Staples Method). Situating the Staples Thesis in the conceptual framework of regulation theory, this paper develops a spatial econometric model of the dynamics of resource-dependent economies that is sensitive to place-based contingency. This model is grounded in a conceptual framework that distinguishes between a productivity regime and a demand regime whose qualitative properties depend on the assemblage of governance, regulatory and institutional norms that determine the coherence of the relationship between the structure of production and consumption. Within the limits of data availability, a spatial extension of a reduced-form Kaldorian growth model is employed to empirically test Staples Theory by focusing on the differential impact of both the demand regime and the productivity regime on the relative economic performance of Western Australian localities over the course of the recent (2001–11) resource boom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Area Development and Policy\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"212 - 234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Area Development and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2022.2107035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area Development and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2022.2107035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要按照惯例,斯台普斯论文构成了一个关于资源依赖型经济发展轨迹的历史和地理特殊性的假设(斯台普斯理论),以及一个优先考虑背景或当地知识的方法论(斯台普方法)。本文将斯台普斯论文置于管制理论的概念框架中,建立了一个对基于地点的偶然性敏感的资源依赖型经济动态的空间计量模型。这一模式的基础是一个概念框架,该框架区分了生产力制度和需求制度,需求制度的质量特性取决于治理、监管和制度规范的组合,这些规范决定了生产和消费结构之间关系的一致性。在数据可用性的范围内,通过关注需求制度和生产力制度对最近(2001-11)资源繁荣过程中西澳大利亚地区相对经济表现的差异影响,采用简化形式的Kaldorian增长模型的空间扩展来实证检验斯台普斯理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Staples Thesis, local models and competitiveness: the Western Australian economy over the 2001–2011 resource boom
ABSTRACT Conventionally, the Staples Thesis constitutes a hypothesis about both the historical and the geographical particularity of the developmental trajectories of resource-dependent economies (Staples Theory) and a methodology that prioritizes contextual or local knowledge (Staples Method). Situating the Staples Thesis in the conceptual framework of regulation theory, this paper develops a spatial econometric model of the dynamics of resource-dependent economies that is sensitive to place-based contingency. This model is grounded in a conceptual framework that distinguishes between a productivity regime and a demand regime whose qualitative properties depend on the assemblage of governance, regulatory and institutional norms that determine the coherence of the relationship between the structure of production and consumption. Within the limits of data availability, a spatial extension of a reduced-form Kaldorian growth model is employed to empirically test Staples Theory by focusing on the differential impact of both the demand regime and the productivity regime on the relative economic performance of Western Australian localities over the course of the recent (2001–11) resource boom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Area Development and Policy
Area Development and Policy DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信