{"title":"两次世界大战期间OZ课程“妇女视角”","authors":"Pavel Salák","doi":"10.14712/2464689x.2022.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text does not intend to cover the legal position of women in the interwar drafts of a civil code in a complex manner, instead, it focuses on three different family law issues which were chosen to display how the views and demands of women were (or were not) reflected. As the authors of the recodification were exclusively men, the „women’s point of view“ is merely men’s vision of what the needs of women were. The three different issues are not directly linked, however, they show different approaches of the authors of the recodification.","PeriodicalId":33021,"journal":{"name":"Pravnehistoricke studie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meziválečné osnovy OZ „pohledem žen“\",\"authors\":\"Pavel Salák\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/2464689x.2022.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The text does not intend to cover the legal position of women in the interwar drafts of a civil code in a complex manner, instead, it focuses on three different family law issues which were chosen to display how the views and demands of women were (or were not) reflected. As the authors of the recodification were exclusively men, the „women’s point of view“ is merely men’s vision of what the needs of women were. The three different issues are not directly linked, however, they show different approaches of the authors of the recodification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravnehistoricke studie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravnehistoricke studie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/2464689x.2022.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravnehistoricke studie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/2464689x.2022.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
The text does not intend to cover the legal position of women in the interwar drafts of a civil code in a complex manner, instead, it focuses on three different family law issues which were chosen to display how the views and demands of women were (or were not) reflected. As the authors of the recodification were exclusively men, the „women’s point of view“ is merely men’s vision of what the needs of women were. The three different issues are not directly linked, however, they show different approaches of the authors of the recodification.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
