英国的社会反常?文化上的萎靡会威胁到思想丰富的社会的成果吗?

Chris D. Brown, Ruth Luzmore, Jana Groß Ophoff
{"title":"英国的社会反常?文化上的萎靡会威胁到思想丰富的社会的成果吗?","authors":"Chris D. Brown, Ruth Luzmore, Jana Groß Ophoff","doi":"10.35241/emeraldopenres.14786.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The ideas-informed society represents a desired situation in which: 1) citizens see value in staying up to date, and; 2) citizens regularly keep themselves up to date by actively, openly and critically engaging with new ideas, developments and claims to truth. As a result, it is hoped citizens become increasingly knowledgeable, better able to make good decisions, and better positioned to support new progressive norms and beliefs. Yet despite these potential benefits, a substantive proportion of the population do not value staying up to date, nor attempt to do so. Methods: With this research project we seek to identify whether the theoretical lens of anomie can account for why ‘ideas refusers’ do not engage with ideas, as well as provide clues as to how they might be encouraged to do so. To explore the possible impacts of anomie on ideas-engagement we conducted four online focus groups, interviewing a purposive sample of ten individuals who previously indicated they were ideas refusers. Results: Our findings identify eleven themes which seemingly account for why ideas refusers do not currently engage with ideas. Of these, ten are related to anomie, including themes which encapsulate feelings of frustration, anxiety, confusion and powerlessness regarding the complexities of modern society. Conclusions: We also identify three areas of future focus that might help the ongoing development of the ideas-informed society. These are: 1) the more positive and relevant reporting of ideas; 2) supporting ‘healthy’ face-to-face engagement with ideas; and 3) supporting effective ideas engagement through social media.","PeriodicalId":91015,"journal":{"name":"Emerald open research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anomie in the UK? Can cultural malaise threaten the fruition of the ideas-informed society?\",\"authors\":\"Chris D. Brown, Ruth Luzmore, Jana Groß Ophoff\",\"doi\":\"10.35241/emeraldopenres.14786.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The ideas-informed society represents a desired situation in which: 1) citizens see value in staying up to date, and; 2) citizens regularly keep themselves up to date by actively, openly and critically engaging with new ideas, developments and claims to truth. As a result, it is hoped citizens become increasingly knowledgeable, better able to make good decisions, and better positioned to support new progressive norms and beliefs. Yet despite these potential benefits, a substantive proportion of the population do not value staying up to date, nor attempt to do so. Methods: With this research project we seek to identify whether the theoretical lens of anomie can account for why ‘ideas refusers’ do not engage with ideas, as well as provide clues as to how they might be encouraged to do so. To explore the possible impacts of anomie on ideas-engagement we conducted four online focus groups, interviewing a purposive sample of ten individuals who previously indicated they were ideas refusers. Results: Our findings identify eleven themes which seemingly account for why ideas refusers do not currently engage with ideas. Of these, ten are related to anomie, including themes which encapsulate feelings of frustration, anxiety, confusion and powerlessness regarding the complexities of modern society. Conclusions: We also identify three areas of future focus that might help the ongoing development of the ideas-informed society. These are: 1) the more positive and relevant reporting of ideas; 2) supporting ‘healthy’ face-to-face engagement with ideas; and 3) supporting effective ideas engagement through social media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerald open research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerald open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.14786.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.14786.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:思想灵通的社会代表了一种理想的情况:1)公民看到紧跟时代的价值;2)公民通过积极、公开和批判地参与新思想、新发展和对真理的主张,定期使自己与时俱进。因此,希望公民变得越来越有见识,能够更好地做出正确的决定,并更好地支持新的进步规范和信仰。然而,尽管有这些潜在的好处,相当一部分人并不重视与时俱进,也不打算这样做。方法:通过这个研究项目,我们试图确定社会反常的理论视角是否可以解释为什么“拒绝思想的人”不接受思想,并提供如何鼓励他们这样做的线索。为了探索失范对想法参与的可能影响,我们进行了四个在线焦点小组,采访了10个有目的的样本,这些样本之前表示他们是想法拒绝者。结果:我们的发现确定了11个主题,这些主题似乎解释了为什么拒绝想法的人目前不参与到想法中来。在这些作品中,有10个与社会反常有关,其中包括对现代社会复杂性的沮丧、焦虑、困惑和无力感的主题。结论:我们还确定了未来关注的三个领域,这些领域可能有助于思想知情社会的持续发展。它们是:1)更积极和相关的想法报告;2)支持“健康的”面对面交流;3)通过社交媒体支持有效的思想交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anomie in the UK? Can cultural malaise threaten the fruition of the ideas-informed society?
Background: The ideas-informed society represents a desired situation in which: 1) citizens see value in staying up to date, and; 2) citizens regularly keep themselves up to date by actively, openly and critically engaging with new ideas, developments and claims to truth. As a result, it is hoped citizens become increasingly knowledgeable, better able to make good decisions, and better positioned to support new progressive norms and beliefs. Yet despite these potential benefits, a substantive proportion of the population do not value staying up to date, nor attempt to do so. Methods: With this research project we seek to identify whether the theoretical lens of anomie can account for why ‘ideas refusers’ do not engage with ideas, as well as provide clues as to how they might be encouraged to do so. To explore the possible impacts of anomie on ideas-engagement we conducted four online focus groups, interviewing a purposive sample of ten individuals who previously indicated they were ideas refusers. Results: Our findings identify eleven themes which seemingly account for why ideas refusers do not currently engage with ideas. Of these, ten are related to anomie, including themes which encapsulate feelings of frustration, anxiety, confusion and powerlessness regarding the complexities of modern society. Conclusions: We also identify three areas of future focus that might help the ongoing development of the ideas-informed society. These are: 1) the more positive and relevant reporting of ideas; 2) supporting ‘healthy’ face-to-face engagement with ideas; and 3) supporting effective ideas engagement through social media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信