在群体的科学研究中，群体动力学发生了什么？

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT

Team Performance Management Pub Date : 2021-02-22 DOI:10.1108/TPM-10-2020-0091

S. Schruijer

{"title":"在群体的科学研究中，群体动力学发生了什么？","authors":"S. Schruijer","doi":"10.1108/TPM-10-2020-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explore whether a group dynamics perspective still exists in the scientific study of groups and what factors may account for the current situation.,Alongside reflections based on my professional experience, I have analyzed the main academic journals that publish group research.,A group dynamics perspective is almost totally absent in the scientific study of groups. Contributing factors to this state of affairs are disciplinary developments in psychology (e.g. individualization, experimentalization and specialization), the demise of the status of psychoanalysis, changes in the meaning and manifestation of the “group,” and effects of New Public Management.,The study offers a critical perspective on current group research practices and considers these in a larger (social and historical) context. It advocates a group dynamics perspective for the study of groups, based on systems-psychodynamic insights.","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whatever happened to group dynamics in the scientific study of groups?\",\"authors\":\"S. Schruijer\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/TPM-10-2020-0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to explore whether a group dynamics perspective still exists in the scientific study of groups and what factors may account for the current situation.,Alongside reflections based on my professional experience, I have analyzed the main academic journals that publish group research.,A group dynamics perspective is almost totally absent in the scientific study of groups. Contributing factors to this state of affairs are disciplinary developments in psychology (e.g. individualization, experimentalization and specialization), the demise of the status of psychoanalysis, changes in the meaning and manifestation of the “group,” and effects of New Public Management.,The study offers a critical perspective on current group research practices and considers these in a larger (social and historical) context. It advocates a group dynamics perspective for the study of groups, based on systems-psychodynamic insights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Team Performance Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Team Performance Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2020-0091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Team Performance Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2020-0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨群体动力学观点在群体的科学研究中是否仍然存在，以及是什么因素导致了目前的情况。，除了根据我的专业经验进行反思外，我还分析了发表群体研究的主要学术期刊。，在群体的科学研究中，群体动力学的观点几乎是完全不存在的。造成这种状况的因素是心理学的学科发展（如个体化、实验化和专业化）、精神分析地位的消亡、“群体”的含义和表现形式的变化以及新公共管理的影响。，该研究对当前的群体研究实践提供了一个批判性的视角，并在更大的（社会和历史）背景下考虑这些实践。它提倡基于系统心理动力学见解的群体动力学视角来研究群体。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Whatever happened to group dynamics in the scientific study of groups?

The purpose of this study is to explore whether a group dynamics perspective still exists in the scientific study of groups and what factors may account for the current situation.,Alongside reflections based on my professional experience, I have analyzed the main academic journals that publish group research.,A group dynamics perspective is almost totally absent in the scientific study of groups. Contributing factors to this state of affairs are disciplinary developments in psychology (e.g. individualization, experimentalization and specialization), the demise of the status of psychoanalysis, changes in the meaning and manifestation of the “group,” and effects of New Public Management.,The study offers a critical perspective on current group research practices and considers these in a larger (social and historical) context. It advocates a group dynamics perspective for the study of groups, based on systems-psychodynamic insights.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Team Performance Management MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

29.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： This international journal contributes to the successful implementation and development of work teams and team-based organizations by providing a forum for sharing experience and learning to stimulate thought and transfer of ideas. It seeks to bridge the gap between research and practice by publishing articles where the claims are evidence-based and the conclusions have practical value. Effective teams form the heart of every successful organization. But team management is one of the hardest challenges faced by managers.