主权公民的超和谐:本土头衔人类学的当代问题

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Pascale Taplin, Claire Holland, Lorelei Billing
{"title":"主权公民的超和谐:本土头衔人类学的当代问题","authors":"Pascale Taplin,&nbsp;Claire Holland,&nbsp;Lorelei Billing","doi":"10.1111/taja.12480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Australian <i>Native Title Act 1993</i> (<i>Cth</i>) provides for the recognition of rights and interests which arise from the traditional laws and customs of Australian First Nation peoples. Processing applications for a determination of native title can take many years and involves numerous stakeholders, presentation of evidence of ongoing connection with the land and sea within a claim area, negotiations with other parties including from industry and government, as well as negotiations between Indigenous groups. The process can be long, arduous, and often outcomes fail to satisfy the expectations of native title claimants. In this paper we investigate how individuals who either disagree with the premise underlying native title, or who have suffered negative impacts through the course of native title claims, may be either targeted by, or swept up in, Australian sovereign citizen rhetoric. We aim to contextualise presentations of sovereign citizen ideas in native title claim processes by providing an overview of the history of sovereign citizen thought, and examples of its contemporary expression in some Australian online forums. In doing this we aim to provide a broad foundation for future research into the issue. The dialogue in sovereign citizen online communities exposes people to extremism and superconspiracies. This article will provide a theoretical framework and historical context to the Australian sovereign citizen phenomena and describe online amplification of disinformation in Australia that has the potential to cause harm. We illustrate how stakeholders who are drawn to relatively moderate online content (such as opposing native title) may be radicalised through gradual exposure to extremist anti-government sentiment and hate speech. This article highlights the need for further research into sovereign citizenry in Australia, and strategies for native title practitioners to engage claimants who subscribe to and disseminate sovereign citizen disinformation in native title processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45452,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","volume":"34 2","pages":"110-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/taja.12480","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The sovereign citizen superconspiracy: Contemporary issues in native title anthropology\",\"authors\":\"Pascale Taplin,&nbsp;Claire Holland,&nbsp;Lorelei Billing\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/taja.12480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Australian <i>Native Title Act 1993</i> (<i>Cth</i>) provides for the recognition of rights and interests which arise from the traditional laws and customs of Australian First Nation peoples. Processing applications for a determination of native title can take many years and involves numerous stakeholders, presentation of evidence of ongoing connection with the land and sea within a claim area, negotiations with other parties including from industry and government, as well as negotiations between Indigenous groups. The process can be long, arduous, and often outcomes fail to satisfy the expectations of native title claimants. In this paper we investigate how individuals who either disagree with the premise underlying native title, or who have suffered negative impacts through the course of native title claims, may be either targeted by, or swept up in, Australian sovereign citizen rhetoric. We aim to contextualise presentations of sovereign citizen ideas in native title claim processes by providing an overview of the history of sovereign citizen thought, and examples of its contemporary expression in some Australian online forums. In doing this we aim to provide a broad foundation for future research into the issue. The dialogue in sovereign citizen online communities exposes people to extremism and superconspiracies. This article will provide a theoretical framework and historical context to the Australian sovereign citizen phenomena and describe online amplification of disinformation in Australia that has the potential to cause harm. We illustrate how stakeholders who are drawn to relatively moderate online content (such as opposing native title) may be radicalised through gradual exposure to extremist anti-government sentiment and hate speech. This article highlights the need for further research into sovereign citizenry in Australia, and strategies for native title practitioners to engage claimants who subscribe to and disseminate sovereign citizen disinformation in native title processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"110-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/taja.12480\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/taja.12480\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/taja.12480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1993年《澳大利亚土著所有权法》(联邦)规定承认澳大利亚第一民族的传统法律和习俗所产生的权利和利益。处理确定土著所有权的申请可能需要多年时间,涉及众多利益相关者,提交与主张区域内土地和海洋持续联系的证据,与包括工业界和政府在内的其他各方进行谈判,以及土著群体之间的谈判。这个过程可能是漫长而艰巨的,结果往往不能满足土著权利申请人的期望。在本文中,我们研究了那些不同意土著权利的前提,或者在土著权利主张过程中遭受负面影响的个人,是如何成为澳大利亚主权公民言论的目标,或者被卷入其中的。我们的目标是通过概述主权公民思想的历史,以及在一些澳大利亚在线论坛中其当代表达的例子,将主权公民思想在土著所有权主张过程中的表现置于背景中。通过这样做,我们的目标是为未来对这一问题的研究提供广泛的基础。主权公民在线社区的对话将人们暴露在极端主义和超级阴谋面前。本文将为澳大利亚主权公民现象提供理论框架和历史背景,并描述澳大利亚有可能造成伤害的虚假信息的在线放大。我们说明了被相对温和的在线内容(如反对本土标题)所吸引的利益相关者如何通过逐渐暴露于极端的反政府情绪和仇恨言论而变得激进。本文强调需要进一步研究澳大利亚的主权公民,以及土著权利从业者在土著权利过程中参与订阅和传播主权公民虚假信息的索赔人的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The sovereign citizen superconspiracy: Contemporary issues in native title anthropology

The Australian Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) provides for the recognition of rights and interests which arise from the traditional laws and customs of Australian First Nation peoples. Processing applications for a determination of native title can take many years and involves numerous stakeholders, presentation of evidence of ongoing connection with the land and sea within a claim area, negotiations with other parties including from industry and government, as well as negotiations between Indigenous groups. The process can be long, arduous, and often outcomes fail to satisfy the expectations of native title claimants. In this paper we investigate how individuals who either disagree with the premise underlying native title, or who have suffered negative impacts through the course of native title claims, may be either targeted by, or swept up in, Australian sovereign citizen rhetoric. We aim to contextualise presentations of sovereign citizen ideas in native title claim processes by providing an overview of the history of sovereign citizen thought, and examples of its contemporary expression in some Australian online forums. In doing this we aim to provide a broad foundation for future research into the issue. The dialogue in sovereign citizen online communities exposes people to extremism and superconspiracies. This article will provide a theoretical framework and historical context to the Australian sovereign citizen phenomena and describe online amplification of disinformation in Australia that has the potential to cause harm. We illustrate how stakeholders who are drawn to relatively moderate online content (such as opposing native title) may be radicalised through gradual exposure to extremist anti-government sentiment and hate speech. This article highlights the need for further research into sovereign citizenry in Australia, and strategies for native title practitioners to engage claimants who subscribe to and disseminate sovereign citizen disinformation in native title processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信