检视反身性元语篇在群组邮件请求中从属沟通建构中的运用

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Jamie McKeown
{"title":"检视反身性元语篇在群组邮件请求中从属沟通建构中的运用","authors":"Jamie McKeown","doi":"10.1075/ps.21006.mck","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This qualitative study examines how male-identified and female-identified individuals use reflexive metadiscourse\n in the construction of affiliative communication, i.e., a mode of communication traditionally coded as feminine. Specifically, it\n examines requests made in the public context of group email. Both reflexive metadiscourse and affiliative communication are\n analysed with the concept of indexicality, and two novel sub-categories (i.e., directing and committing) are added to an existing\n taxonomy. The findings show that whether communicating to institutional subordinates, equals, or superiors, female-identified and\n male-identified senders displayed great similarity in their use of reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative\n communication. Amongst other things, reflexive metadiscourse indirectly indexed the following communicative behaviours associated\n with affiliative communication: sharing contextual information, expressing supportive feedback, constructing diminutive personas,\n and suppressing personal agency. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the findings and directions for\n future research.","PeriodicalId":44036,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the use of reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative communication in group email\\n requests\",\"authors\":\"Jamie McKeown\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ps.21006.mck\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This qualitative study examines how male-identified and female-identified individuals use reflexive metadiscourse\\n in the construction of affiliative communication, i.e., a mode of communication traditionally coded as feminine. Specifically, it\\n examines requests made in the public context of group email. Both reflexive metadiscourse and affiliative communication are\\n analysed with the concept of indexicality, and two novel sub-categories (i.e., directing and committing) are added to an existing\\n taxonomy. The findings show that whether communicating to institutional subordinates, equals, or superiors, female-identified and\\n male-identified senders displayed great similarity in their use of reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative\\n communication. Amongst other things, reflexive metadiscourse indirectly indexed the following communicative behaviours associated\\n with affiliative communication: sharing contextual information, expressing supportive feedback, constructing diminutive personas,\\n and suppressing personal agency. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the findings and directions for\\n future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatics and Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21006.mck\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21006.mck","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本定性研究探讨了男性认同和女性认同的个体如何在构建从属沟通中使用反身性元话语,即传统上被编码为女性化的沟通模式。具体来说,它检查在群组电子邮件的公共环境中发出的请求。用索引性的概念分析了反身性元话语和从属交际,并在现有的分类中增加了两个新的子类别(即指导和承诺)。研究结果表明,无论是与机构下属、同级还是上级沟通,女性认同和男性认同的发送者在构建从属沟通时使用反身元话语的方式都表现出很大的相似性。此外,反身性元话语间接索引了以下与从属交际相关的交际行为:分享语境信息、表达支持性反馈、构建小角色和抑制个人能动性。文章最后讨论了研究结果的意义和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the use of reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative communication in group email requests
This qualitative study examines how male-identified and female-identified individuals use reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative communication, i.e., a mode of communication traditionally coded as feminine. Specifically, it examines requests made in the public context of group email. Both reflexive metadiscourse and affiliative communication are analysed with the concept of indexicality, and two novel sub-categories (i.e., directing and committing) are added to an existing taxonomy. The findings show that whether communicating to institutional subordinates, equals, or superiors, female-identified and male-identified senders displayed great similarity in their use of reflexive metadiscourse in the construction of affiliative communication. Amongst other things, reflexive metadiscourse indirectly indexed the following communicative behaviours associated with affiliative communication: sharing contextual information, expressing supportive feedback, constructing diminutive personas, and suppressing personal agency. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the findings and directions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信