口服给药乙酰氯芬酸的原体:桨叶透析方法对体内外相关性(Ivivc)预测的影响

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Aliasgar F. Shahiwala, R. Sammour, S. H. Almurisi, M. Taher
{"title":"口服给药乙酰氯芬酸的原体:桨叶透析方法对体内外相关性(Ivivc)预测的影响","authors":"Aliasgar F. Shahiwala, R. Sammour, S. H. Almurisi, M. Taher","doi":"10.2174/2210303113666230221100526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis study aims to assess the suitability of in vitro drug release methods, dialysis and paddle methods for predicting in vivo behaviour of Aceclofenac (ACE) proniosomes.\n\n\n\nIn vitro dissolution methods can mimic in vivo dissolution behaviour of BCS Class II drug and compounds belonging to this are eligible to establish a significant in vitro in vivo correlation (IVIVC). Therefore, the appropriate selection of dissolution test conditions is important to have a method able to discriminate among drug products with potential problems of bioavailability\n\n\n\nACE proniosomes are prepared using different carriers: glucose, maltodextrin and mannitol by the slurry method. The release studies of ACE proniosomes formulations were performed using the paddle, and dialysis methods while in vivo studies were performed in albino rats. Graphical presentation, model-dependent and model-independent approaches were applied to compare two dissolution methods.\n\n\n\nThe objective of this work was to establish a point-to-point (level A) relationship between the in vitro dissolution and the in vivo absorption rate of ACE from the proniosomal system.\n\n\n\nMore than 70% of the drug was released from ACE proniosomes over 60 min by paddle method while not more than 5% was released in the same period by dialysis method. The paddle method provides a reproducible and faster release, whereas poor drug release occurred with the dialysis method. For the paddle method, lower values of similarity factor (f2) and greater differences in the dissolution efficiency (DE) amongst different formulations and in comparison, to that of the pure drug indicates that it is a more discriminative method compared to dialysis. The paddle method also illustrated high regression coefficients (r2) of 0.81, 0.998 and 0.975 for FN1, FN2, and FN3, respectively for level A IVIVC, while poor or no relation (r2 < 0.1) was detected in the case of dialysis method.\n\n\n\nBased on the results, the paddle method is concluded to be the more suitable method compared to the dialysis method for in vitro drug release studies of a novel dosage form such as proniosomes.\n\n\n\nBased on the results, the paddle method is concluded to be the more suitable method compared to the dialysis method for in vitro drug release studies of a novel dosage form such as proniosomes.\n","PeriodicalId":11310,"journal":{"name":"Drug Delivery Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proniosomes For Oral Delivery Of Aceclofenac: Impact Of Paddle Versus Dialysis Methods On In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation (Ivivc) Predictions\",\"authors\":\"Aliasgar F. Shahiwala, R. Sammour, S. H. Almurisi, M. Taher\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2210303113666230221100526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThis study aims to assess the suitability of in vitro drug release methods, dialysis and paddle methods for predicting in vivo behaviour of Aceclofenac (ACE) proniosomes.\\n\\n\\n\\nIn vitro dissolution methods can mimic in vivo dissolution behaviour of BCS Class II drug and compounds belonging to this are eligible to establish a significant in vitro in vivo correlation (IVIVC). Therefore, the appropriate selection of dissolution test conditions is important to have a method able to discriminate among drug products with potential problems of bioavailability\\n\\n\\n\\nACE proniosomes are prepared using different carriers: glucose, maltodextrin and mannitol by the slurry method. The release studies of ACE proniosomes formulations were performed using the paddle, and dialysis methods while in vivo studies were performed in albino rats. Graphical presentation, model-dependent and model-independent approaches were applied to compare two dissolution methods.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe objective of this work was to establish a point-to-point (level A) relationship between the in vitro dissolution and the in vivo absorption rate of ACE from the proniosomal system.\\n\\n\\n\\nMore than 70% of the drug was released from ACE proniosomes over 60 min by paddle method while not more than 5% was released in the same period by dialysis method. The paddle method provides a reproducible and faster release, whereas poor drug release occurred with the dialysis method. For the paddle method, lower values of similarity factor (f2) and greater differences in the dissolution efficiency (DE) amongst different formulations and in comparison, to that of the pure drug indicates that it is a more discriminative method compared to dialysis. The paddle method also illustrated high regression coefficients (r2) of 0.81, 0.998 and 0.975 for FN1, FN2, and FN3, respectively for level A IVIVC, while poor or no relation (r2 < 0.1) was detected in the case of dialysis method.\\n\\n\\n\\nBased on the results, the paddle method is concluded to be the more suitable method compared to the dialysis method for in vitro drug release studies of a novel dosage form such as proniosomes.\\n\\n\\n\\nBased on the results, the paddle method is concluded to be the more suitable method compared to the dialysis method for in vitro drug release studies of a novel dosage form such as proniosomes.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Delivery Letters\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Delivery Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210303113666230221100526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Delivery Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210303113666230221100526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在评估体外药物释放方法、透析和桨法预测Aceclofenac(ACE)前体体内行为的适用性。体外溶出方法可以模拟BCS II类药物的体内溶出行为,属于这种方法的化合物有资格建立显著的体外-体内相关性(IVIVC)。因此,适当选择溶出度测试条件对于建立一种能够区分具有潜在生物利用度问题的药物产品的方法至关重要。ACE前体是使用不同的载体制备的:葡萄糖、麦芽糊精和甘露醇,采用浆料法。ACE前体制剂的释放研究是使用桨和透析方法进行的,而体内研究是在白化大鼠中进行的。采用图形表示法、模型相关法和模型无关法对两种溶解方法进行了比较。这项工作的目的是建立ACE从前体系统的体外溶出和体内吸收率之间的点对点(a级)关系。超过70%的药物在60岁时从ACE前体中释放 min,而透析法在同一时间内释放不超过5%。桨法提供了可重复和更快的释放,而透析法的药物释放较差。对于桨法,与纯药物相比,不同配方之间的相似因子(f2)值较低,溶解效率(DE)差异较大,这表明与透析相比,桨法是一种更具歧视性的方法。桨法还显示,对于A级IVIVIVC,FN1、FN2和FN3的回归系数(r2)分别为0.81、0.998和0.975,而在透析法的情况下检测到较差或无相关性(r2<0.1)。基于这些结果,桨法被认为是与透析法相比更适合用于新剂型(如前体)的体外药物释放研究的方法。基于这些结果,桨法被认为是与透析法相比更适合用于新剂型(如前体)的体外药物释放研究的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proniosomes For Oral Delivery Of Aceclofenac: Impact Of Paddle Versus Dialysis Methods On In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation (Ivivc) Predictions
This study aims to assess the suitability of in vitro drug release methods, dialysis and paddle methods for predicting in vivo behaviour of Aceclofenac (ACE) proniosomes. In vitro dissolution methods can mimic in vivo dissolution behaviour of BCS Class II drug and compounds belonging to this are eligible to establish a significant in vitro in vivo correlation (IVIVC). Therefore, the appropriate selection of dissolution test conditions is important to have a method able to discriminate among drug products with potential problems of bioavailability ACE proniosomes are prepared using different carriers: glucose, maltodextrin and mannitol by the slurry method. The release studies of ACE proniosomes formulations were performed using the paddle, and dialysis methods while in vivo studies were performed in albino rats. Graphical presentation, model-dependent and model-independent approaches were applied to compare two dissolution methods. The objective of this work was to establish a point-to-point (level A) relationship between the in vitro dissolution and the in vivo absorption rate of ACE from the proniosomal system. More than 70% of the drug was released from ACE proniosomes over 60 min by paddle method while not more than 5% was released in the same period by dialysis method. The paddle method provides a reproducible and faster release, whereas poor drug release occurred with the dialysis method. For the paddle method, lower values of similarity factor (f2) and greater differences in the dissolution efficiency (DE) amongst different formulations and in comparison, to that of the pure drug indicates that it is a more discriminative method compared to dialysis. The paddle method also illustrated high regression coefficients (r2) of 0.81, 0.998 and 0.975 for FN1, FN2, and FN3, respectively for level A IVIVC, while poor or no relation (r2 < 0.1) was detected in the case of dialysis method. Based on the results, the paddle method is concluded to be the more suitable method compared to the dialysis method for in vitro drug release studies of a novel dosage form such as proniosomes. Based on the results, the paddle method is concluded to be the more suitable method compared to the dialysis method for in vitro drug release studies of a novel dosage form such as proniosomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Delivery Letters
Drug Delivery Letters Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信