肩袖修复后早期康复对临床和生物力学结果的影响是什么?一项随机对照试验

IF 0.4 Q4 REHABILITATION
B. Mazuquin, Punnet Monga, S. Basu, J. Selfe, J. Richards
{"title":"肩袖修复后早期康复对临床和生物力学结果的影响是什么?一项随机对照试验","authors":"B. Mazuquin, Punnet Monga, S. Basu, J. Selfe, J. Richards","doi":"10.3233/ppr-200489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The number of rotator cuff repairs performed worldwide is increasing every year. However, there are still controversies regarding when rehabilitation after surgery should start. OBJECTIVES: To assess and to compare clinical and biomechanical outcomes of patients who were randomised and allocated to early or conservative rehabilitation after rotator cuff repairs. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomised to two treatment groups. The biomechanical assessments were performed before surgery and at three and six months, consisting of 3D kinematics and muscle activity from 5 muscles (upper trapezius, anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, posterior deltoid and biceps brachii) from six movement tasks. In addition, the Oxford Shoulder Score and EQ-5D-5L were also recorded. At 12 months an ultrasound scan was performed to check the repair integrity. RESULTS: Overall, both groups had similar results for function and health-related quality of life. However, at six months patients in the early group had better range of motion (ROM) than those in the conservative group, especially for shoulder flexion (Early: median = 152.1° vs Conservative: median = 140.0°). The number of re-tear events was higher in the early group (5 vs 1), and of these only two patients reported symptoms at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Early rehabilitation may improve ROM but it does not seem to be superior to a conservative management in improving function and quality of life. In addition, more re-tear events were observed in the early group. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. Keywords:","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/ppr-200489","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the impact of early rehabilitation following rotator cuff repairs on clinical and biomechanical outcomes? A randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"B. Mazuquin, Punnet Monga, S. Basu, J. Selfe, J. Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/ppr-200489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: The number of rotator cuff repairs performed worldwide is increasing every year. However, there are still controversies regarding when rehabilitation after surgery should start. OBJECTIVES: To assess and to compare clinical and biomechanical outcomes of patients who were randomised and allocated to early or conservative rehabilitation after rotator cuff repairs. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomised to two treatment groups. The biomechanical assessments were performed before surgery and at three and six months, consisting of 3D kinematics and muscle activity from 5 muscles (upper trapezius, anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, posterior deltoid and biceps brachii) from six movement tasks. In addition, the Oxford Shoulder Score and EQ-5D-5L were also recorded. At 12 months an ultrasound scan was performed to check the repair integrity. RESULTS: Overall, both groups had similar results for function and health-related quality of life. However, at six months patients in the early group had better range of motion (ROM) than those in the conservative group, especially for shoulder flexion (Early: median = 152.1° vs Conservative: median = 140.0°). The number of re-tear events was higher in the early group (5 vs 1), and of these only two patients reported symptoms at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Early rehabilitation may improve ROM but it does not seem to be superior to a conservative management in improving function and quality of life. In addition, more re-tear events were observed in the early group. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. Keywords:\",\"PeriodicalId\":38170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/ppr-200489\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-200489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-200489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:世界范围内肩袖修复的数量每年都在增加。然而,手术后的康复何时开始仍存在争议。目的:评估和比较随机分组并分配到肩袖修复后早期或保守康复的患者的临床和生物力学结果。方法:20例患者随机分为两个治疗组。在手术前、3个月和6个月进行生物力学评估,包括5块肌肉(上斜方肌、前三角肌、中三角肌、后三角肌和肱二头肌)在6个运动任务中的3D运动学和肌肉活动。此外,还记录了牛津肩部评分和EQ-5D-5L。12个月时进行超声扫描以检查修复的完整性。结果:总体而言,两组在功能和健康相关生活质量方面的结果相似。然而,在6个月时,早期组患者的活动范围(ROM)优于保守组,尤其是肩关节屈曲(早期组:中位数= 152.1°,而保守组:中位数= 140.0°)。早期组再撕裂事件的数量较高(5比1),其中只有2例患者在12个月时报告出现症状。结论:早期康复可以改善ROM,但在改善功能和生活质量方面并不优于保守治疗。此外,早期组观察到更多的再撕裂事件。然而,由于样本量小,结果应谨慎解释。关键词:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the impact of early rehabilitation following rotator cuff repairs on clinical and biomechanical outcomes? A randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The number of rotator cuff repairs performed worldwide is increasing every year. However, there are still controversies regarding when rehabilitation after surgery should start. OBJECTIVES: To assess and to compare clinical and biomechanical outcomes of patients who were randomised and allocated to early or conservative rehabilitation after rotator cuff repairs. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomised to two treatment groups. The biomechanical assessments were performed before surgery and at three and six months, consisting of 3D kinematics and muscle activity from 5 muscles (upper trapezius, anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, posterior deltoid and biceps brachii) from six movement tasks. In addition, the Oxford Shoulder Score and EQ-5D-5L were also recorded. At 12 months an ultrasound scan was performed to check the repair integrity. RESULTS: Overall, both groups had similar results for function and health-related quality of life. However, at six months patients in the early group had better range of motion (ROM) than those in the conservative group, especially for shoulder flexion (Early: median = 152.1° vs Conservative: median = 140.0°). The number of re-tear events was higher in the early group (5 vs 1), and of these only two patients reported symptoms at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Early rehabilitation may improve ROM but it does not seem to be superior to a conservative management in improving function and quality of life. In addition, more re-tear events were observed in the early group. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. Keywords:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信