三维适形深吸气屏气与自由呼吸调强放疗技术治疗左侧乳腺癌的比较剂量学研究

Q3 Health Professions
M. Morsy, E. Attalla, W. Attia
{"title":"三维适形深吸气屏气与自由呼吸调强放疗技术治疗左侧乳腺癌的比较剂量学研究","authors":"M. Morsy, E. Attalla, W. Attia","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2020.44451.1681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Most women with left-sided breast cancer are at an increased risk of heartmorbidity and mortality from the adjuvant radiotherapy due to an increase in heart absorbed dose during radiotherapy treatment. This study aimed to compare free-breathing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FB-IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal deep inspiration breath-hold (3DCRT-DIBH) techniques in terms of the cardiac dose. Material and Methods: In total, 15 women with left-sided breast cancer underwent FB and DIBH computed tomography (CT) scans in the same supine position. For DIBH CT, 3D-CRT plans were created using two opposing wedged tangential fields and for FB-CT, 4-5 IMRT optimized tangential fields were created. All plans were evaluated using the dose-volume histogram. The data were analyzed in SPSS software version 20 (IBM, IL). Results: The FB-IMRT plans were more homogeneous and had more dose coverage and fewer hotspots, than the 3DCRT-DIBH plans; however, the planning target volume V95% was clinically acceptable for both techniques. Furthermore, the 3DCRT-DIBH plans were much faster and require fewer monitor units. A significantly lower mean dose of heart, left lung, left anterior descending coronary artery, right lung, and V10% left lung were observed in 3DCRT-DIBH plans, compared to FB-IMRT plans. Moreover, FB-IMRT plans showed a significant further dose reduction in heart V25% and V30%. Conclusion: The majority of the patients with left-sided breast cancer who treated with the DIBH technique were getting sufficient benefits of radiotherapy, and DIBH was a comprehensive strategy for reducing cardiac doses during radiotherapy treatment.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"18 1","pages":"194-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Dosimetric Study for the Treatment of Left-Sided Breast Cancer using Three-Dimensional Conformal Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold and Free-Breathing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques\",\"authors\":\"M. Morsy, E. Attalla, W. Attia\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/IJMP.2020.44451.1681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Most women with left-sided breast cancer are at an increased risk of heartmorbidity and mortality from the adjuvant radiotherapy due to an increase in heart absorbed dose during radiotherapy treatment. This study aimed to compare free-breathing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FB-IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal deep inspiration breath-hold (3DCRT-DIBH) techniques in terms of the cardiac dose. Material and Methods: In total, 15 women with left-sided breast cancer underwent FB and DIBH computed tomography (CT) scans in the same supine position. For DIBH CT, 3D-CRT plans were created using two opposing wedged tangential fields and for FB-CT, 4-5 IMRT optimized tangential fields were created. All plans were evaluated using the dose-volume histogram. The data were analyzed in SPSS software version 20 (IBM, IL). Results: The FB-IMRT plans were more homogeneous and had more dose coverage and fewer hotspots, than the 3DCRT-DIBH plans; however, the planning target volume V95% was clinically acceptable for both techniques. Furthermore, the 3DCRT-DIBH plans were much faster and require fewer monitor units. A significantly lower mean dose of heart, left lung, left anterior descending coronary artery, right lung, and V10% left lung were observed in 3DCRT-DIBH plans, compared to FB-IMRT plans. Moreover, FB-IMRT plans showed a significant further dose reduction in heart V25% and V30%. Conclusion: The majority of the patients with left-sided breast cancer who treated with the DIBH technique were getting sufficient benefits of radiotherapy, and DIBH was a comprehensive strategy for reducing cardiac doses during radiotherapy treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"194-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.44451.1681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.44451.1681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导览:由于放疗过程中心脏吸收剂量的增加,大多数左侧乳腺癌妇女在辅助放疗中心脏发病率和死亡率的风险增加。本研究旨在比较自由呼吸调强放疗(FB-IMRT)和三维适形深度吸气屏气(3DCRT-DIBH)技术在心脏剂量方面的差异。材料和方法:共有15名左侧乳腺癌患者在相同的仰卧位上进行了FB和DIBH计算机断层扫描(CT)。对于DIBH CT,使用两个相对的楔形切向场创建3D-CRT计划,对于FB-CT,创建4-5个IMRT优化切向场。使用剂量-体积直方图评估所有计划。数据采用SPSS软件version 20 (IBM, IL)进行分析。结果:与3DCRT-DIBH计划相比,FB-IMRT计划更均匀,剂量覆盖更广,热点更少;然而,两种技术的规划靶体积V95%在临床上都是可接受的。此外,3DCRT-DIBH方案更快,需要更少的监视器单元。3DCRT-DIBH方案的心脏、左肺、左冠状动脉前降支、右肺和左肺V10%的平均剂量明显低于FB-IMRT方案。此外,FB-IMRT计划显示心脏剂量进一步降低V25%和V30%。结论:大多数采用DIBH技术治疗的左侧乳腺癌患者获得了足够的放疗获益,DIBH是一种在放疗过程中降低心脏剂量的综合策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Dosimetric Study for the Treatment of Left-Sided Breast Cancer using Three-Dimensional Conformal Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold and Free-Breathing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques
Introduction: Most women with left-sided breast cancer are at an increased risk of heartmorbidity and mortality from the adjuvant radiotherapy due to an increase in heart absorbed dose during radiotherapy treatment. This study aimed to compare free-breathing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FB-IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal deep inspiration breath-hold (3DCRT-DIBH) techniques in terms of the cardiac dose. Material and Methods: In total, 15 women with left-sided breast cancer underwent FB and DIBH computed tomography (CT) scans in the same supine position. For DIBH CT, 3D-CRT plans were created using two opposing wedged tangential fields and for FB-CT, 4-5 IMRT optimized tangential fields were created. All plans were evaluated using the dose-volume histogram. The data were analyzed in SPSS software version 20 (IBM, IL). Results: The FB-IMRT plans were more homogeneous and had more dose coverage and fewer hotspots, than the 3DCRT-DIBH plans; however, the planning target volume V95% was clinically acceptable for both techniques. Furthermore, the 3DCRT-DIBH plans were much faster and require fewer monitor units. A significantly lower mean dose of heart, left lung, left anterior descending coronary artery, right lung, and V10% left lung were observed in 3DCRT-DIBH plans, compared to FB-IMRT plans. Moreover, FB-IMRT plans showed a significant further dose reduction in heart V25% and V30%. Conclusion: The majority of the patients with left-sided breast cancer who treated with the DIBH technique were getting sufficient benefits of radiotherapy, and DIBH was a comprehensive strategy for reducing cardiac doses during radiotherapy treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信