{"title":"被动干粉吸入器的次优吸入流量:大问题还是被夸大了?","authors":"J. Weers","doi":"10.3389/fddev.2022.855234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) that a subject can achieve through the mouthpiece of a “passive” dry powder inhaler (DPI) is driven chiefly by their inspiratory muscle strength (Clark, 2015). Muscle strength increases with age, peaking at about age 25, plateauing until about age 40, after which it steadily decreases. Males achieve greater MIP values than females, and increases in disease severity may further reduce MIP. When using DPIs, patients rarely inhale with maximal effort, instead achieving peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) that are about 40–80% of their MIP (Clark, 2015 and references therein). Based on these observations, current industry guidance is that passive DPIs are inherently flow rate dependent, and that young children and elderly patients may not be able to achieve the PIP or peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR) necessary to effectively fluidize and disperse dry powders, especially during acute exacerbations (Laube et al., 2011). For patients with COPD, it has been suggested that: “If the PIFR is less than 60 L min the patient may not achieve optimal clinical benefit (with inhaled bronchodilators), and a different delivery system such as a metered dose or soft mist inhaler or nebulized therapy should be considered” (Mahler, 2017). Based on results of multiple breathing studies in COPD patients, it was further suggested that between 19 and 78% of stable outpatients, and 32–47% of in-patients prior to discharge after admission for an exacerbation, have a suboptimal PIFR <60 L min (Mahler et al., 2013; Mahler, 2017; Mahler, 2020). More recently, Mahler has taken the argument one step further, suggesting that PIFR be used as a therapeutic biomarker to guide delivery system selection, while dropping the optimal flow rate for high resistance DPIs to 30 L min (Mahler and Halpin, 2021). This opinion reviews the available literature regarding flow rate dependence of inhaled bronchodilators when administered with passive DPIs for the treatment of asthma and COPD.","PeriodicalId":73079,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in drug delivery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suboptimal Inspiratory Flow Rates With Passive Dry Powder Inhalers: Big Issue or Overstated Problem?\",\"authors\":\"J. Weers\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fddev.2022.855234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) that a subject can achieve through the mouthpiece of a “passive” dry powder inhaler (DPI) is driven chiefly by their inspiratory muscle strength (Clark, 2015). Muscle strength increases with age, peaking at about age 25, plateauing until about age 40, after which it steadily decreases. Males achieve greater MIP values than females, and increases in disease severity may further reduce MIP. When using DPIs, patients rarely inhale with maximal effort, instead achieving peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) that are about 40–80% of their MIP (Clark, 2015 and references therein). Based on these observations, current industry guidance is that passive DPIs are inherently flow rate dependent, and that young children and elderly patients may not be able to achieve the PIP or peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR) necessary to effectively fluidize and disperse dry powders, especially during acute exacerbations (Laube et al., 2011). For patients with COPD, it has been suggested that: “If the PIFR is less than 60 L min the patient may not achieve optimal clinical benefit (with inhaled bronchodilators), and a different delivery system such as a metered dose or soft mist inhaler or nebulized therapy should be considered” (Mahler, 2017). Based on results of multiple breathing studies in COPD patients, it was further suggested that between 19 and 78% of stable outpatients, and 32–47% of in-patients prior to discharge after admission for an exacerbation, have a suboptimal PIFR <60 L min (Mahler et al., 2013; Mahler, 2017; Mahler, 2020). More recently, Mahler has taken the argument one step further, suggesting that PIFR be used as a therapeutic biomarker to guide delivery system selection, while dropping the optimal flow rate for high resistance DPIs to 30 L min (Mahler and Halpin, 2021). This opinion reviews the available literature regarding flow rate dependence of inhaled bronchodilators when administered with passive DPIs for the treatment of asthma and COPD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in drug delivery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in drug delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fddev.2022.855234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fddev.2022.855234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
受试者通过“被动”干粉吸入器(DPI)的吸口所能达到的最大吸气压力(MIP)主要由其吸气肌力量驱动(Clark, 2015)。肌肉力量随着年龄的增长而增加,在25岁左右达到顶峰,直到40岁左右趋于平稳,之后逐渐下降。男性的MIP值高于女性,疾病严重程度的增加可能进一步降低MIP。当使用dpi时,患者很少以最大的努力吸气,而是达到峰值吸气压力(PIP),约为其MIP的40-80% (Clark, 2015和其中的参考文献)。基于这些观察结果,目前的行业指导是,被动dpi固有地依赖于流量,幼儿和老年患者可能无法达到有效流化和分散干粉所需的PIP或峰值吸气流量(PIFR),特别是在急性加重期间(Laube等人,2011)。对于COPD患者,有研究表明:“如果PIFR小于60 L min,患者可能无法获得最佳临床获益(使用吸入式支气管扩张剂),应考虑使用不同的给药系统,如计量或软雾吸入器或雾化治疗”(Mahler, 2017)。基于COPD患者的多项呼吸研究结果,进一步表明,19 - 78%的稳定门诊患者和32-47%的住院患者在入院后加重出院前的PIFR <60 L min为次优(Mahler等,2013;马勒,2017;马勒,2020)。最近,Mahler进一步提出,PIFR可作为一种治疗性生物标志物来指导给药系统的选择,同时将高阻力dpi的最佳流速降至30 L min (Mahler和Halpin, 2021)。这一观点回顾了现有的关于被动dpi治疗哮喘和COPD时吸入支气管扩张剂流速依赖性的文献。
Suboptimal Inspiratory Flow Rates With Passive Dry Powder Inhalers: Big Issue or Overstated Problem?
The maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) that a subject can achieve through the mouthpiece of a “passive” dry powder inhaler (DPI) is driven chiefly by their inspiratory muscle strength (Clark, 2015). Muscle strength increases with age, peaking at about age 25, plateauing until about age 40, after which it steadily decreases. Males achieve greater MIP values than females, and increases in disease severity may further reduce MIP. When using DPIs, patients rarely inhale with maximal effort, instead achieving peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) that are about 40–80% of their MIP (Clark, 2015 and references therein). Based on these observations, current industry guidance is that passive DPIs are inherently flow rate dependent, and that young children and elderly patients may not be able to achieve the PIP or peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR) necessary to effectively fluidize and disperse dry powders, especially during acute exacerbations (Laube et al., 2011). For patients with COPD, it has been suggested that: “If the PIFR is less than 60 L min the patient may not achieve optimal clinical benefit (with inhaled bronchodilators), and a different delivery system such as a metered dose or soft mist inhaler or nebulized therapy should be considered” (Mahler, 2017). Based on results of multiple breathing studies in COPD patients, it was further suggested that between 19 and 78% of stable outpatients, and 32–47% of in-patients prior to discharge after admission for an exacerbation, have a suboptimal PIFR <60 L min (Mahler et al., 2013; Mahler, 2017; Mahler, 2020). More recently, Mahler has taken the argument one step further, suggesting that PIFR be used as a therapeutic biomarker to guide delivery system selection, while dropping the optimal flow rate for high resistance DPIs to 30 L min (Mahler and Halpin, 2021). This opinion reviews the available literature regarding flow rate dependence of inhaled bronchodilators when administered with passive DPIs for the treatment of asthma and COPD.