四旋翼飞机在推进失效情况下的地面碰撞面积估算

Q2 Social Sciences
Mohd Hasrizam Che Man, Anush Kumar Sivakumar, Haoliang Hu, Kin Huat Low
{"title":"四旋翼飞机在推进失效情况下的地面碰撞面积估算","authors":"Mohd Hasrizam Che Man, Anush Kumar Sivakumar, Haoliang Hu, Kin Huat Low","doi":"10.2514/1.d0320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small unmanned aircraft systems or drones are expected to be used for different applications, such as parcel delivery, inspection, and aerial photography, in urban areas. However, drones usually use an electric system to power up the propulsion, communications, navigation, and flight control system, which means that it is not as reliable as the manned aircraft system and may result in failure during operation and then crash to the ground. At present, there is almost no extensive publication about the high-fidelity modeling used by drones to calculate the crash trajectory and point of crash. The experimental data for modeling and simulation verification of multirotor aircraft are limited. So far, crash trajectory prediction has been limited to point mass or ballistic methods, and these methods are usually only suitable for complete power failure and without any control system. This study intends to investigate the effects of different multirotor drones’ failure modes on its crash trajectory and crash area compared to the ballistic model by using ADAMS and MATLAB cosimulation methods. Conclusions from the study show the crash trajectory, flight distance, and impact speed of the drones under four failure modes, which are quite different from the ballistic trajectory. The findings can potentially contribute to better risk assessment of the multirotor drones for the urban environment operation.","PeriodicalId":36984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ground Crash Area Estimation of Quadrotor Aircraft Under Propulsion Failure\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Hasrizam Che Man, Anush Kumar Sivakumar, Haoliang Hu, Kin Huat Low\",\"doi\":\"10.2514/1.d0320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Small unmanned aircraft systems or drones are expected to be used for different applications, such as parcel delivery, inspection, and aerial photography, in urban areas. However, drones usually use an electric system to power up the propulsion, communications, navigation, and flight control system, which means that it is not as reliable as the manned aircraft system and may result in failure during operation and then crash to the ground. At present, there is almost no extensive publication about the high-fidelity modeling used by drones to calculate the crash trajectory and point of crash. The experimental data for modeling and simulation verification of multirotor aircraft are limited. So far, crash trajectory prediction has been limited to point mass or ballistic methods, and these methods are usually only suitable for complete power failure and without any control system. This study intends to investigate the effects of different multirotor drones’ failure modes on its crash trajectory and crash area compared to the ballistic model by using ADAMS and MATLAB cosimulation methods. Conclusions from the study show the crash trajectory, flight distance, and impact speed of the drones under four failure modes, which are quite different from the ballistic trajectory. The findings can potentially contribute to better risk assessment of the multirotor drones for the urban environment operation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Air Transportation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Air Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.d0320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.d0320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

小型无人驾驶飞机系统或无人机预计将用于城市地区的包裹递送、检查和航空摄影等不同应用。然而,无人机通常使用电力系统为推进,通信,导航和飞行控制系统供电,这意味着它不像有人驾驶飞机系统那样可靠,并且可能导致在操作过程中出现故障,然后坠毁到地面。目前,关于无人机用于计算坠毁轨迹和坠毁点的高保真建模,几乎没有广泛的出版物。多旋翼飞行器建模和仿真验证的实验数据有限。到目前为止,碰撞轨迹预测仅限于点质量或弹道方法,这些方法通常只适用于完全停电和没有任何控制系统的情况。本研究拟采用ADAMS和MATLAB联合仿真的方法,对比弹道模型,研究不同故障模式对多旋翼无人机坠毁轨迹和坠毁面积的影响。研究结论显示,四种失效模式下无人机的坠毁轨迹、飞行距离和撞击速度与弹道轨迹有较大差异。研究结果可能有助于更好地评估多旋翼无人机在城市环境中运行的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ground Crash Area Estimation of Quadrotor Aircraft Under Propulsion Failure
Small unmanned aircraft systems or drones are expected to be used for different applications, such as parcel delivery, inspection, and aerial photography, in urban areas. However, drones usually use an electric system to power up the propulsion, communications, navigation, and flight control system, which means that it is not as reliable as the manned aircraft system and may result in failure during operation and then crash to the ground. At present, there is almost no extensive publication about the high-fidelity modeling used by drones to calculate the crash trajectory and point of crash. The experimental data for modeling and simulation verification of multirotor aircraft are limited. So far, crash trajectory prediction has been limited to point mass or ballistic methods, and these methods are usually only suitable for complete power failure and without any control system. This study intends to investigate the effects of different multirotor drones’ failure modes on its crash trajectory and crash area compared to the ballistic model by using ADAMS and MATLAB cosimulation methods. Conclusions from the study show the crash trajectory, flight distance, and impact speed of the drones under four failure modes, which are quite different from the ballistic trajectory. The findings can potentially contribute to better risk assessment of the multirotor drones for the urban environment operation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Air Transportation
Journal of Air Transportation Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信