{"title":"“收藏、收藏与收藏家”特刊简介","authors":"Phillip Grimberg","doi":"10.1163/24684791-12340040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contributors to this special issue of Ming Qing Yanjiu have brought together diverse and original scholarship on various aspects of our topic that reflects upon the complexity of collecting as a concerted social act. Broadly defined as the selective acquisition and maintenance of an interrelated set of objects, collecting has long played a prominent role in different strata of society across time and cultures.1 In the introduction to their edited volume on Cultures of Collecting John Elsner and Roger Cardinal identify “[the] urge to erect a permanent complete system against the destructiveness of time” as one of the most compelling incentives for collecting.2 Thus, in keeping, maintaining, and safeguarding objects that carry multiple meanings—personal, historical, social, political, cultural, or other—while simultaneously ascribing a certain value and a biographical dimension to these objects based on historic and/or social contingency,3 the collector functions as a transmitter of material evidence of human creative and mimetic acts.4 The fruit of these acts might eventually feature in a catalogue or an inventory of a given collection that provides information about the objects collected. However inchoate and vestigial, the practice of recording a collection’s contents evidently points to an intent not only to itemize, but","PeriodicalId":29854,"journal":{"name":"Ming Qing Yanjiu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24684791-12340040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to Special Issue on “Collecting, Collections, and Collectors”\",\"authors\":\"Phillip Grimberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/24684791-12340040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The contributors to this special issue of Ming Qing Yanjiu have brought together diverse and original scholarship on various aspects of our topic that reflects upon the complexity of collecting as a concerted social act. Broadly defined as the selective acquisition and maintenance of an interrelated set of objects, collecting has long played a prominent role in different strata of society across time and cultures.1 In the introduction to their edited volume on Cultures of Collecting John Elsner and Roger Cardinal identify “[the] urge to erect a permanent complete system against the destructiveness of time” as one of the most compelling incentives for collecting.2 Thus, in keeping, maintaining, and safeguarding objects that carry multiple meanings—personal, historical, social, political, cultural, or other—while simultaneously ascribing a certain value and a biographical dimension to these objects based on historic and/or social contingency,3 the collector functions as a transmitter of material evidence of human creative and mimetic acts.4 The fruit of these acts might eventually feature in a catalogue or an inventory of a given collection that provides information about the objects collected. However inchoate and vestigial, the practice of recording a collection’s contents evidently points to an intent not only to itemize, but\",\"PeriodicalId\":29854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ming Qing Yanjiu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24684791-12340040\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ming Qing Yanjiu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/24684791-12340040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ming Qing Yanjiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24684791-12340040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这期《明清烟酒》特刊的撰稿人汇集了关于我们这个主题的各个方面的各种各样的原创学术,反映了收藏作为一种协调一致的社会行为的复杂性。收藏被广泛地定义为选择性地获取和维护一套相互关联的物品,长期以来,收藏在不同时代和文化的社会不同阶层中发挥着突出的作用约翰·埃尔斯纳(John Elsner)和罗杰·卡迪纳(Roger Cardinal)在他们编辑的《收藏文化》(Cultures of Collecting)一书的前言中指出,“建立一个永久完整的系统以对抗时间的破坏性的冲动”是收藏最令人信服的动机之一因此,在保存、维护和保护具有多重意义的物品——个人的、历史的、社会的、政治的、文化的或其他的——同时赋予这些物品一定的价值和传记维度(基于历史和/或社会偶然性)的过程中,收藏者扮演了人类创造和模仿行为物证的传递者的角色这些行为的成果可能最终会出现在提供有关所收集物品信息的目录或给定收藏品的清单中。无论多么不成熟和陈旧,记录藏品内容的做法显然表明,其意图不仅是逐项记录,而且是记录
Introduction to Special Issue on “Collecting, Collections, and Collectors”
The contributors to this special issue of Ming Qing Yanjiu have brought together diverse and original scholarship on various aspects of our topic that reflects upon the complexity of collecting as a concerted social act. Broadly defined as the selective acquisition and maintenance of an interrelated set of objects, collecting has long played a prominent role in different strata of society across time and cultures.1 In the introduction to their edited volume on Cultures of Collecting John Elsner and Roger Cardinal identify “[the] urge to erect a permanent complete system against the destructiveness of time” as one of the most compelling incentives for collecting.2 Thus, in keeping, maintaining, and safeguarding objects that carry multiple meanings—personal, historical, social, political, cultural, or other—while simultaneously ascribing a certain value and a biographical dimension to these objects based on historic and/or social contingency,3 the collector functions as a transmitter of material evidence of human creative and mimetic acts.4 The fruit of these acts might eventually feature in a catalogue or an inventory of a given collection that provides information about the objects collected. However inchoate and vestigial, the practice of recording a collection’s contents evidently points to an intent not only to itemize, but