基于机器学习的全麻过敏反应风险预测分析

Shuang Liu , Yasuyuki Suzuki , Toshihiro Yorozuya , Masaki Mogi
{"title":"基于机器学习的全麻过敏反应风险预测分析","authors":"Shuang Liu ,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Suzuki ,&nbsp;Toshihiro Yorozuya ,&nbsp;Masaki Mogi","doi":"10.1016/j.immuno.2022.100018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Perioperative anaphylaxis has a risk of mortality and compromised quality of patient care. It is difficult to design an evaluation system for risk of anaphylaxis using preoperative tests available in clinical practice. To develop a personalized risk forecast platform for general anesthesia-related anaphylaxis, as a first step, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of machine-learning-based classification using clinical features of patients for risk prediction of anesthesia-related anaphylaxis. After data pre-processing, the performance of five classification methods: Logistic Regression Analysis, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Naïve Bayes), which were integrated with four feature selection methods (Recursive Feature Elimination, Chi-Squared Method, Correlation-based Feature Selection, and Information Gain Ratio), was evaluated using two-layer cross-validation. Seventy-four features, which were defined from 225 participants, were applied for model fitting. Linear Discriminant Analysis in conjunction with Recursive Feature Elimination showed good performance, with accuracy of 0.867 and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.558 with 25 features used in the classification. Logistic Regression in conjunction with Recursive Feature Elimination model also showed adequate performance, with accuracy of 0.858 and MCC of 0.541 with six features used in the classification. This study presents initial proof of the capability of a machine-learning-based strategy for forecasting low-prevalence anesthesia-related anaphylaxis from a clinical perspective. It could provide a basis for establishing an effective risk-scoring and predictive system for perioperative anaphylaxis that would help identify preoperatively whether anaphylaxis will occur and could be used to predict unstable patient states preceding anaphylactic shock.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73343,"journal":{"name":"Immunoinformatics (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667119022000106/pdfft?md5=f7650e92c7467a93c664c6e740e93243&pid=1-s2.0-S2667119022000106-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine-learning-based analytics for risk forecasting of anaphylaxis during general anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Shuang Liu ,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Suzuki ,&nbsp;Toshihiro Yorozuya ,&nbsp;Masaki Mogi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.immuno.2022.100018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Perioperative anaphylaxis has a risk of mortality and compromised quality of patient care. It is difficult to design an evaluation system for risk of anaphylaxis using preoperative tests available in clinical practice. To develop a personalized risk forecast platform for general anesthesia-related anaphylaxis, as a first step, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of machine-learning-based classification using clinical features of patients for risk prediction of anesthesia-related anaphylaxis. After data pre-processing, the performance of five classification methods: Logistic Regression Analysis, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Naïve Bayes), which were integrated with four feature selection methods (Recursive Feature Elimination, Chi-Squared Method, Correlation-based Feature Selection, and Information Gain Ratio), was evaluated using two-layer cross-validation. Seventy-four features, which were defined from 225 participants, were applied for model fitting. Linear Discriminant Analysis in conjunction with Recursive Feature Elimination showed good performance, with accuracy of 0.867 and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.558 with 25 features used in the classification. Logistic Regression in conjunction with Recursive Feature Elimination model also showed adequate performance, with accuracy of 0.858 and MCC of 0.541 with six features used in the classification. This study presents initial proof of the capability of a machine-learning-based strategy for forecasting low-prevalence anesthesia-related anaphylaxis from a clinical perspective. It could provide a basis for establishing an effective risk-scoring and predictive system for perioperative anaphylaxis that would help identify preoperatively whether anaphylaxis will occur and could be used to predict unstable patient states preceding anaphylactic shock.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunoinformatics (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667119022000106/pdfft?md5=f7650e92c7467a93c664c6e740e93243&pid=1-s2.0-S2667119022000106-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunoinformatics (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667119022000106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunoinformatics (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667119022000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

围手术期过敏反应有死亡率和患者护理质量受损的风险。在临床实践中,很难使用术前测试来设计一个评估过敏反应风险的系统。为了开发全麻相关过敏反应的个性化风险预测平台,作为第一步,我们的目标是研究基于机器学习的分类,利用患者的临床特征进行麻醉相关过敏反应风险预测的可行性。数据预处理后,采用两层交叉验证的方法对Logistic回归分析、支持向量机、随机森林、线性判别分析和Naïve贝叶斯5种分类方法与递归特征消除法、卡方法、基于相关性的特征选择和信息增益比4种特征选择方法相结合的性能进行评价。从225个参与者中定义74个特征,应用于模型拟合。结合递归特征消除的线性判别分析表现出较好的分类效果,使用25个特征进行分类,准确率为0.867,Matthews相关系数(MCC)为0.558。Logistic回归结合递归特征消除模型也表现出了良好的性能,使用6个特征进行分类,准确率为0.858,MCC为0.541。本研究初步证明了从临床角度预测低流行率麻醉相关过敏反应的基于机器学习的策略的能力。为建立围手术期过敏反应的有效风险评分和预测系统提供基础,有助于术前确定是否会发生过敏反应,并可用于预测患者在过敏性休克前的不稳定状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine-learning-based analytics for risk forecasting of anaphylaxis during general anesthesia

Machine-learning-based analytics for risk forecasting of anaphylaxis during general anesthesia

Perioperative anaphylaxis has a risk of mortality and compromised quality of patient care. It is difficult to design an evaluation system for risk of anaphylaxis using preoperative tests available in clinical practice. To develop a personalized risk forecast platform for general anesthesia-related anaphylaxis, as a first step, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of machine-learning-based classification using clinical features of patients for risk prediction of anesthesia-related anaphylaxis. After data pre-processing, the performance of five classification methods: Logistic Regression Analysis, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Linear Discriminant Analysis, and Naïve Bayes), which were integrated with four feature selection methods (Recursive Feature Elimination, Chi-Squared Method, Correlation-based Feature Selection, and Information Gain Ratio), was evaluated using two-layer cross-validation. Seventy-four features, which were defined from 225 participants, were applied for model fitting. Linear Discriminant Analysis in conjunction with Recursive Feature Elimination showed good performance, with accuracy of 0.867 and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.558 with 25 features used in the classification. Logistic Regression in conjunction with Recursive Feature Elimination model also showed adequate performance, with accuracy of 0.858 and MCC of 0.541 with six features used in the classification. This study presents initial proof of the capability of a machine-learning-based strategy for forecasting low-prevalence anesthesia-related anaphylaxis from a clinical perspective. It could provide a basis for establishing an effective risk-scoring and predictive system for perioperative anaphylaxis that would help identify preoperatively whether anaphylaxis will occur and could be used to predict unstable patient states preceding anaphylactic shock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunoinformatics (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Immunoinformatics (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Immunology, Computer Science Applications
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信