什么,怎么做,为什么?12种无目标评价的比较分析

Brandon W. Youker
{"title":"什么,怎么做,为什么?12种无目标评价的比较分析","authors":"Brandon W. Youker","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v15i33.444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nBackground: Goal-free evaluation (GFE) is any evaluation in which the evaluator conducts the evaluation without reference to predetermined goals or objectives.   \n  \nPurpose: The purpose of this study is to examine GFE in actual practice focusing on what GFE is, how it is conducted, and why the evaluators use it. \n  \nSetting: Not applicable. \n  \nIntervention: Not applicable. \n  \nResearch Design:  Document analysis. \n \n \nData Collection and Analysis: The researcher collected data from a non-random sample of 12 cases of GFE found in published and non-published papers, reports, and guidebooks. The researcher analyzed the documents using quantitative and qualitative content analysis. \n  \nFindings: The findings suggest that goal-free evaluators consider GFE an outcome evaluation that supplements GBE. These goal-free evaluators typically used an ex post facto evaluation design, non-random sampling of stakeholders, and semi-structured interviewing to collect data. The evaluators described using GFE to improve the evaluand, to find side-effects, and to evaluate highly complex evaluands. \n  \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What, How, and Why? A Comparative Analysis of 12 Goal-Free Evaluations\",\"authors\":\"Brandon W. Youker\",\"doi\":\"10.56645/jmde.v15i33.444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n \\nBackground: Goal-free evaluation (GFE) is any evaluation in which the evaluator conducts the evaluation without reference to predetermined goals or objectives.   \\n  \\nPurpose: The purpose of this study is to examine GFE in actual practice focusing on what GFE is, how it is conducted, and why the evaluators use it. \\n  \\nSetting: Not applicable. \\n  \\nIntervention: Not applicable. \\n  \\nResearch Design:  Document analysis. \\n \\n \\nData Collection and Analysis: The researcher collected data from a non-random sample of 12 cases of GFE found in published and non-published papers, reports, and guidebooks. The researcher analyzed the documents using quantitative and qualitative content analysis. \\n  \\nFindings: The findings suggest that goal-free evaluators consider GFE an outcome evaluation that supplements GBE. These goal-free evaluators typically used an ex post facto evaluation design, non-random sampling of stakeholders, and semi-structured interviewing to collect data. The evaluators described using GFE to improve the evaluand, to find side-effects, and to evaluate highly complex evaluands. \\n  \\n \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":91909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v15i33.444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v15i33.444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:无目标评估(GFE)是指评估者在不参考预先确定的目标或目的的情况下进行评估的任何评估。目的:本研究的目的是在实际实践中检查GFE,重点是什么是GFE,它是如何进行的,以及评估人员为什么使用它。设置:不适用。干预:不适用。研究设计:文献分析。数据收集和分析:研究人员从已发表和未发表的论文、报告和指南中发现的12例GFE病例的非随机样本中收集数据。研究人员采用定量和定性内容分析的方法对文献进行分析。研究结果:研究结果表明,无目标评估者认为GFE是对GBE的补充。这些无目标评估者通常使用事后评估设计、利益相关者的非随机抽样和半结构化访谈来收集数据。评估人员描述了使用GFE来改进评估人员、发现副作用以及评估高度复杂的评估人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What, How, and Why? A Comparative Analysis of 12 Goal-Free Evaluations
Background: Goal-free evaluation (GFE) is any evaluation in which the evaluator conducts the evaluation without reference to predetermined goals or objectives.     Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine GFE in actual practice focusing on what GFE is, how it is conducted, and why the evaluators use it.   Setting: Not applicable.   Intervention: Not applicable.   Research Design:  Document analysis. Data Collection and Analysis: The researcher collected data from a non-random sample of 12 cases of GFE found in published and non-published papers, reports, and guidebooks. The researcher analyzed the documents using quantitative and qualitative content analysis.   Findings: The findings suggest that goal-free evaluators consider GFE an outcome evaluation that supplements GBE. These goal-free evaluators typically used an ex post facto evaluation design, non-random sampling of stakeholders, and semi-structured interviewing to collect data. The evaluators described using GFE to improve the evaluand, to find side-effects, and to evaluate highly complex evaluands.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信